Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Ford / Ford Trucks / May 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

1999 Ranger 2.5 4cyl pings???

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
mike2711@yahoo.com - 24 Apr 2005 04:36 GMT
I have a 1999 Ford Ranger 2.5 with 55k miles that pings under load. It
started all of the sudden with a new tank of gas about 3 tank fulls
ago. I have always run middle grade (89) with no problems. At first I
thought it was a bad tank of gas, but has persisted with fresh fill
ups. It idles a little rougher when cold and hesitates some but when
warmed up, seems ok. It may seem strange but when I drive to work in
morning, it rarely pings. When I drive home (same route) in the late
afternoon, it pings persistently. Weather related? (Colder air in
morning, warmer in afternoon!) The check engine light has not come
on... If the check engine has NOT come on, does that mean all sensors
are working? I am currently running a can of Berryman B12 with premium
gas as an initial inexpensive try to remedy. Anybody have any ideas?
JimV - 24 Apr 2005 04:38 GMT
> I have a 1999 Ford Ranger 2.5 with 55k miles that pings under load. It
> started all of the sudden with a new tank of gas about 3 tank fulls
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> are working? I am currently running a can of Berryman B12 with premium
> gas as an initial inexpensive try to remedy. Anybody have any ideas?

Get the error codes read. A failed knock sensor will cause this and will
not turn on the CEL.
mike2711@yahoo.com - 24 Apr 2005 04:55 GMT
Hi Jim V! Thanks for the response. I was told by dealer and Autozone
that if the "check engine light" doesn't come on, it won't record any
codes?? I also forgot to mention that the truck has a new "mass air
flow" sensor about 6 months ago. I already tried cleaning the maf
filament wires with contact cleaner.
JimV - 24 Apr 2005 05:19 GMT
> Hi Jim V! Thanks for the response. I was told by dealer and Autozone
> that if the "check engine light" doesn't come on, it won't record any
> codes?? I also forgot to mention that the truck has a new "mass air
> flow" sensor about 6 months ago. I already tried cleaning the maf
> filament wires with contact cleaner.

They are wrong. Some codes are just recorded including the knock sensor.
Steve - 24 Apr 2005 06:47 GMT
Many times the code gets logged in, but because it doesn't meet x-criteria,
no CEL (Check Engine Light) Some codes require 2 or 3 times of certain
conditions to set the light, until then they can be listed under "pending
codes" in many scan tools

Signature

Stephen W. Hansen
ASE Certified Master Automobile Technician
ASE Undercar Specialist

> Hi Jim V! Thanks for the response. I was told by dealer and Autozone
> that if the "check engine light" doesn't come on, it won't record any
> codes?? I also forgot to mention that the truck has a new "mass air
> flow" sensor about 6 months ago. I already tried cleaning the maf
> filament wires with contact cleaner.
mike2711@yahoo.com - 24 Apr 2005 08:28 GMT
Thanks Stephen! Typically will dealerships scan the codes for free or
do they charge? Will they even do it without the CEL on? Autozone won't
scan codes unless CEL is on!
JimV - 24 Apr 2005 15:08 GMT
> Thanks Stephen! Typically will dealerships scan the codes for free or
> do they charge? Will they even do it without the CEL on? Autozone won't
> scan codes unless CEL is on!

Dealers don't to anything for free. Tell autozone it's been coming on
intermittantly. They'll read it.
Steve - 25 Apr 2005 06:32 GMT
Pinging is pre ignition. Something is starting the combustion burn before is
suppose to. Sometimes it is caused by carbon build-up in the combustion
chamber, a run-rite fuel tune is suppose to burn out the carbon.
http://www.run-rite.com/industry/products01a.htm        We sell it at our
store, and I do believe it helps. I would start with a good tune up, and go
from there..

Signature

Stephen W. Hansen
ASE Certified Master Automobile Technician
ASE Undercar Specialist

>> Thanks Stephen! Typically will dealerships scan the codes for free or
>> do they charge? Will they even do it without the CEL on? Autozone won't
>> scan codes unless CEL is on!
>>
> Dealers don't to anything for free. Tell autozone it's been coming on
> intermittantly. They'll read it.
mike2711@yahoo.com - 28 Apr 2005 19:37 GMT
Thanks for all the replies!! I have since switched to premium gas and
will add a fuel cleaner additive for a couple tankfulls. The pingng
does now seem to have stopped and the truck seems to run pretty well
when up to normal operating temp. BUT the engine hesitates when cold!!
The check engine light has never come on, so the emission
system/sensors are probably ok. Does this sound like carbon build-up in
the combustion chamber? I have read about a "water trick" where you
take a warm engine and rev it while you take a vacuum line and feed
water into the intake which supposedly helps break down the carbon
build-up??? Is this safe??? I have called my local dealer and he wants
$107 to clean the fuel injectors and from what he says, it sound very
familiar to the water method... Fuel filter was changed maybe 7500
miles ago. Still has original plugs and wires but isn't scheduled to
get new plugs and wires until 100k. It only has 55k... Any ideas??

Thanks! -mike
Steve - 29 Apr 2005 05:32 GMT
Take it to a shop and have them do the "fuel tune" That's what it's called
at Firestone. The question is of liability. If you try this water trick and
it tears up your engine, who pays? The "Fuel tune" by "run rite" has had
extensive research done by Texaco.. Anyway, it they screw up you car you
have a good chance of some reimbursement.

Signature

Stephen W. Hansen
ASE Certified Master Automobile Technician
ASE Undercar Specialist

> Thanks for all the replies!! I have since switched to premium gas and
> will add a fuel cleaner additive for a couple tankfulls. The pingng
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Thanks! -mike
Kevin Bottorff - 29 Apr 2005 18:08 GMT
> Take it to a shop and have them do the "fuel tune" That's what it's
> called at Firestone. The question is of liability. If you try this
> water trick and it tears up your engine, who pays? The "Fuel tune" by
> "run rite" has had extensive research done by Texaco.. Anyway, it they
> screw up you car you have a good chance of some reimbursement.

at 55,000 you should not need a injector clean at all. the water trick is
for cleaning the cly it self. do not do the water if you do not know
exactly what you are doing as major damage is possable. also at that
milage there will be no build up in the cyl. you don`t need either one.
KB

Signature

ThunderSnake #9  Warn once, shoot twice
460 in the pkup, 460 on the stand for another pkup
and one in the shed for a fun project to yet be decided on

mike2711@yahoo.com - 30 Apr 2005 06:22 GMT
Thanks everybody!
mike2711@yahoo.com - 08 May 2005 20:17 GMT
OK, the saga continues... I have run 2 cans of B12, no help. I have
replaced both O2 sensors, seems to run smoother, a little more power
but pinging persists. It won't ping on premium gas as much, but I read
where that is not good for an engine designed to run on 87 octane. I
have run 89 (mid grade) for over 20k miles with no pinging, then all of
the sudden, it pings.  Others have mentioned the egr valve....I removed
the hose from the top of the egr valve with engine running and engine
continued to run with no change in rpm. Wasn't it supposed to stall?
Help? Help?
The OTHER Kevin in San Diego - 08 May 2005 23:08 GMT
>OK, the saga continues... I have run 2 cans of B12, no help. I have
>replaced both O2 sensors, seems to run smoother, a little more power
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>continued to run with no change in rpm. Wasn't it supposed to stall?
>Help? Help?

Potentialy stupid question here, but have you checked the ignition
timing?  *CAN* you check it at all??  (Not sure if your igntion has a
dist or not...)
mike2711@yahoo.com - 08 May 2005 23:30 GMT
No distributor... All electronic ignition.
coryrhonda - 10 May 2005 03:57 GMT
ford uses a combination of erg and ignition timing to stop predetionation
but the 2.5L. is a Mazda design more (I believe) and I have found many don't
use the egr, just timing and engine design.  to test the egr you will apply
vacuume and that will open the egr valve and kill the motor at idle but that
will only check one of many things on the egr system.  best would be to run
a engine running self test, witch check the whole system, usually passes if
the check engine light is out
> No distributor... All electronic ignition.
mike2711@yahoo.com - 10 May 2005 22:03 GMT
OK, last 2 days it hasn't pinged, I can't explain why, but I haven't
driven much though... Could it be that it took a couple days of driving
for the computer to re-learn, since I disconnected the battery for 20
minutes? Here is what I find interesting though.... When I started the
cold engine, after resetting the computer for the O2 sensor
replacement, it ran perfect cold without any hesitation. The next
morning I started it cold again, and it hesitated until up to normal
operating temp. (which is what it did prior to O2 sensor replacement) I
know that the O2 sensors aren't a part of the equation because it is
still in open loop until normal operating temp anyway and the computer
was probably running some basic pre-programmed calculations until it
had a chance to re-learn......BUT does the fact that it ran perfect
after a reset mean that there probably isn't a carbon build up problem
but rather some sensor misreporting info to the computer? Also, how
long does it typically take for the computer to re-learn after a rest?
mike2711@yahoo.com - 10 May 2005 23:01 GMT
OK, last 2 days it hasn't pinged, I can't explain why, but I haven't
driven much though... Could it be that it took a couple days of driving
for the computer to re-learn, since I disconnected the battery for 20
minutes? Here is what I find interesting though.... When I started the
cold engine, after resetting the computer for the O2 sensor
replacement, it ran perfect cold without any hesitation. The next
morning I started it cold again, and it hesitated until up to normal
operating temp. (which is what it did prior to O2 sensor replacement) I
know that the O2 sensors aren't a part of the equation because it is
still in open loop until normal operating temp anyway and the computer
was probably running some basic pre-programmed calculations until it
had a chance to re-learn......BUT does the fact that it ran perfect
after a reset mean that there probably isn't a carbon build up problem
but rather some sensor misreporting info to the computer? Also, how
long does it typically take for the computer to re-learn after a rest?
coryrhonda - 11 May 2005 03:40 GMT
not sure disconnecting the battery for a couple days will reset the adaptive
sratigy, It didn't clear the codes in the shop a couple weeks ago.  We use a
scan tool to reset fuel trim.  could be wrong.  in 1996 OBDII has  a good
memory to it, but I could be wrong
> OK, last 2 days it hasn't pinged, I can't explain why, but I haven't
> driven much though... Could it be that it took a couple days of driving
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> but rather some sensor misreporting info to the computer? Also, how
> long does it typically take for the computer to re-learn after a rest?
mike2711@yahoo.com - 12 May 2005 17:32 GMT
When I started the cold engine, after resetting the computer for the O2
sensor replacement, it ran perfect cold without any hesitation. The
next morning I started it cold again, and it hesitated until up to
normal operating temp. (which is what it did prior to O2 sensor
replacement) I know that the O2 sensors aren't a part of the equation
because it is still in open loop until normal operating temp anyway and
the computer was probably running some basic pre-programmed
calculations until it had a chance to re-learn......BUT does the fact
that it ran perfect after a reset mean that there probably isn't a
carbon build up problem but rather some sensor misreporting info to the
computer?

As of today it is pinging pretty much more than ever! Here is what it
does...

>From a cold start in the morning, it hesitates until warm. When warm,
it runs somewhat rough (not bad) but definately not like when I bought
it at 32k miles. After it is warm (closed loop) it pings on inclines,
under load and sometimes just going down the freeway! There is distinct
power loss now and sometimes the engine stumbles and stalls while going
down the road (not often) but the engine always starts right back up
after a second or two!

I had to replace the MAF about 7500 miles ago because it wen't bad
(shop ripped me off!) I have since cleaned the MAF again, replaced both
O2 sensors and run 2 cans of B12 in tank, all to no avail! I have
called 2 local Ford dealers and spoke to 2 different service bozos.
These guys just tried to blame it on the local gas, said they couldn't
troubleshoot because of no "check engine light" and tried to rush me
off the phone!

Is it possible the MAF wen't bad again? And cleaning it is not helping
because it is malfunctioning? If I disconnect it and the engine runs
better, does that mean it needs to be replaced?

HELP HELP HELP
Kevin Bottorff - 13 May 2005 01:45 GMT
mike2711@yahoo.com wrote in news:1115915558.011313.177310
@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:

> When I started the cold engine, after resetting the computer for the O2
> sensor replacement, it ran perfect cold without any hesitation. The
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>
> HELP HELP HELP

how  many miles now and have the plugs,wires, fuelfilter? been changed.  
KB

Signature

ThunderSnake #9  Warn once, shoot twice
460 in the pkup, 460 on the stand for another pkup
and one in the shed for a fun project to yet be decided on

mike2711@yahoo.com - 13 May 2005 02:35 GMT
56k miles, plugs and wires aren't scheduled to change until 100k. fuel
filter was changed about 6k ago...
Kevin Bottorff - 13 May 2005 02:43 GMT
mike2711@yahoo.com wrote in news:1115948156.259238.139390
@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:

> 56k miles, plugs and wires aren't scheduled to change until 100k. fuel
> filter was changed about 6k ago...

without a real time scanner I couldn`t really do a good guess even. KB

Signature

ThunderSnake #9  Warn once, shoot twice
460 in the pkup, 460 on the stand for another pkup
and one in the shed for a fun project to yet be decided on

mike2711@yahoo.com - 14 May 2005 06:20 GMT
If anyone is interested... I took it to a shop for a diagnostic, and
all sensors checked out fine. Mechanic says plugs, wires need to be
repaced, and fuel injectors need to be cleaned. He says there is
evidence of substantial carbon build up. After he does all this, it
runs much, much better. It no longer hesitates when cold and it runs
much smoother. BUT it pinged all the way home! After talking to the
mechanic, he suspects it may be the coolant temp sensor that is
misreporting. I went to Napa and picked one up for $20. I replaced the
old one and drove it for 30 minutes. Very little pinging, if any, and
if I did hear any, it was barely audible. ;good;  So I think we found
the culprit. My wife had a 2001 Jetta and we had to change the coolant
temp sensor twice in that car. Thanks to everyone for all their help!
Steve - 15 May 2005 05:56 GMT
A good tech with a scan tool should have looked at the coolant temp,
although I've not fought a pinging problem for the temp sensor, it does
cause hard starts.
Now for my advice. Go to Ford and buy a coolant temp sensor. put it away
until you have this problem again. I put two NAPA sensors in my ford truck
and one in my Mom's Taurus. The truck lasted a year each. The Taurus about 6
months. I learned. Napa's sensor is a plastic tip, Ford is a brass tip.
Also, Stick with Ford EGR valves!

Steve

> If anyone is interested... I took it to a shop for a diagnostic, and
> all sensors checked out fine. Mechanic says plugs, wires need to be
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> the culprit. My wife had a 2001 Jetta and we had to change the coolant
> temp sensor twice in that car. Thanks to everyone for all their help!
mike2711@yahoo.com - 17 May 2005 05:50 GMT
David M - 13 May 2005 10:07 GMT
On Thu, 12 May 2005 09:32:38 -0700, mike2711 rearranged some electrons to
form:

> Is it possible the MAF wen't bad again? And cleaning it is not helping
> because it is malfunctioning? If I disconnect it and the engine runs
> better, does that mean it needs to be replaced?

I doubt the engine will run better if you disconnect the MAF.
Have you tried some different gas?

Signature

David M  (dmacchiarolo)
http://home.triad.rr.com/redsled
T/S 53
sled351 Linux 2.4.18-14  has been up 17 days 18:36

R&B - 24 Apr 2005 21:56 GMT
I read something about cleaning the wire in the mass airflow sensor that was
supposed to stop the pinging. However, if you drive it long enough while
pinging, engine damage will occur. It happened to me with my Ranger with a
3.0 V-6. I put larger tires on the truck and it started pinging. I presume
it was the extra load on the engine due to the taller tires effecting the
overall gear ratio. I noticed the coolant had turned brown. I drained it,
flushed the radiator, then about 4 months later it was brown again.
Combustion gases were getting in the coolant. The pinging (preignition)
probably cracked the head or took the head gasket out.
Ron

>I have a 1999 Ford Ranger 2.5 with 55k miles that pings under load. It
> started all of the sudden with a new tank of gas about 3 tank fulls
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> are working? I am currently running a can of Berryman B12 with premium
> gas as an initial inexpensive try to remedy. Anybody have any ideas?
mike2711@yahoo.com - 25 Apr 2005 04:36 GMT
Thanks for the replies! I have cleaned the MAF sensor, in fact the
sensor itself is only a few months old. I took the truck to a local
auto parts store to scan the trouble codes. There were none! Am I to
assume that all the sensors are working properly? Is it possible that
it just simply needs a tune up. It isn't scheduled to have one till
100k and it only has 55k.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.