>A few reasons for the bigger tire, one is that with the 265 in the
>wheel well of the F350, well it looks like at times that i have
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>fall and I am thinking about waiting for that one to come out but kinda
>need the tires now.
I don't have the BFGs, but I went up to a 285 last time around and I
don't think it was worth it. Increased floatation? Well, on paper
that is true but I've yet to notice a difference. Doughnuts in the
wheelwells? Still looks that way. Going with a 315, maybe even the
305, would improve that situation, but both tires need further vehicle
modifications to be done right. On the negative side, I noticed a big
difference in performance (degraded) and a noticable drop in mileage
(after figuring in the correction) and as mentioned, the speedometer
is now slightly off. If I had it to do over again, I'd either stick
with the 265s or jump to the 315s. If I'm going degrade performance
and mileage, I want to make it worthwhile!
Matt
99 V-10 Super Duty, Super Cab 4x4 (w/4.3 gears)
Matt Macchiarolo - 01 Aug 2005 02:17 GMT
I upsized to 295's and have no problems with fitment, I bought a Truspeed
speedo recalibrator on eBay to correct the speedo. Not a terribly hard
install, would have been easier if it wasn't thirty degrees out. With the
speedo recalibrated, there was no noticeble difference to mileage. Also
worth noting that the BFG AT in 295-75R16, if memory serves, actually has
the same payload rating as the Steeltex (3415# at max pressure), even though
it is still a load range D.
>>A few reasons for the bigger tire, one is that with the 265 in the
>>wheel well of the F350, well it looks like at times that i have
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> Matt
> 99 V-10 Super Duty, Super Cab 4x4 (w/4.3 gears)
epicday - 01 Aug 2005 17:27 GMT
I did know that about the payload, the 295 is higher than the 285.
That is great to hear about the mileage as well, that is something that
I have been thinking about for sure with the price of diesel at were it
is right now.