Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Ford / Ford Trucks / November 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Shocks: any gotchas?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Bill Schwab - 20 Nov 2006 15:13 GMT
Hello all,

I am prioritizing the repairs needed by my "new" 1996 F150 (75k miles).
 The brakes and radial arm bushings are probably next.  Those are _not_
on my DIY list.

A relatively large dollar item on the estimate is shocks, and (please
talk me out of this if you are so motivated) it just doesn't sound that
hard to replace them, and it would cost a fraction of the estimate.  It
sounds like a floor jack, jack stands, chocks, and socket wrenches is
the extent of the tools required.  Are there any other tools I should
have for the job?

If I am reading correctly, the front wheels come off, the back ones
apparently do not(??), and in the rear, one has to separately support
one side of the axle (see below).  Then it's a matter of removing two
bolts in the specified order, out with the old shock, in with the new.

The part about supporting one side of the rear axle confuses me, because
AFAIKT, the jack stands go under the axle anyway.  What am I missing?

This won't happen right away.  For now, I want to find out whether it is
something I can reasonably tackle on my own.

Thanks,

Bill
Joe S. - 20 Nov 2006 21:09 GMT
> Hello all,
>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> Bill

Do you have a service manual for this vehicle?  If not, get one -- the
Haynes manuals are not the best but they are adequate, affordable, and
widely available -- a Haynes manual will show you how to do this.

I am no expert but my experience with shocks is that replacing them is a
simple process -- BUT -- loosening the bolts that hold the shocks can be a
sonofabitch.  Be certain the vehicle is securely on the jack stand -- might
want three wheels on the ground with only one corner on a jack stand -- you
may have to put a lot of weight onto the wrench to break loose the shock
mount bolt, or, yours may come right out with nothing more than a good
heave.

Just my $.02 worth.
Mike - 20 Nov 2006 22:46 GMT
> > Hello all,
> >
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
>
> Just my $.02 worth.

Ditto for above.

Also, use LOTS of wd-40 (or other penetrating oil).  If the nut gets tight while
loosening,  tighen the nut, spray it with wd-40 and try loosening it again.
Repeat untill nut is off.You might also try a propane torch on those really
stubborn nuts.  You'll destroy the rubber bushings in the shock in the process.
(but the shock needed replacing anyway right?)  Heat it up, spray it with
wd-40.  It will smoke a lot, but the thermal shock (hot nut / cold liquid) can
sometime break free the stuck nut.  Repeat a few times.  CAUTION: wd-40 is
flamable, so keep a water spray nearby to put out the flames.  I found out the
hard way...

Hope this helps.

Mike
Bill Schwab - 20 Nov 2006 23:44 GMT
Mike, Joe,

>> I am no expert but my experience with shocks is that replacing them is a
>> simple process -- BUT -- loosening the bolts that hold the shocks can be a
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Ditto for above.

I have the Hayne's manual.  It seems clear enough, except for the
additional support on the axle, which I _think_ conflicts with the
jacking instructions.  A shop manual from Helm is in transit.

> Also, use LOTS of wd-40 (or other penetrating oil).  If the nut gets tight while
> loosening,  tighen the nut, spray it with wd-40 and try loosening it again.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> flamable, so keep a water spray nearby to put out the flames.  I found out the
> hard way...

Would you consider an impact wrench?  I have seen them cheap enough to
get my attention, and it seems like something that could get me out of a
lot of ugly situations.  One question is whether there would be room to
use it.

About the torch, this is all happening kinda close to the gas tanks[*]
for my tastes.  Are there any precautions that can make it safe?

[*] For good or bad, my truck has dual tanks.  Naturally, it gets a
second life as a short-haul weekend wonder :)   One thought I had was to
get them cleaned and use one of them for my emergency/generator gasoline
supply.  Otherwise, I'm not sure how much good it will do me.

Bill
Whitelightning - 21 Nov 2006 15:28 GMT
WD40 is great stuff for lots of things, but as a penatrating oil , well it
just
doesnt. PB Blaster is great,  CRC has a product works pretty good as well.

Shocks are a nut and bolt job, the amount of difficulty is in getting to the
bolts.
some upper bolts on rear shocks can be a real nightmare to get to using hand
tools.
and one has to be carefull not to over tighten some mount designs.

Whitelightning
David M - 21 Nov 2006 17:21 GMT
> WD40 is great stuff for lots of things, but as a penatrating oil , well it
> just
> doesnt. PB Blaster is great,  CRC has a product works pretty good as well.

> Whitelightning

Amen on PB Blaster.  It stinks, but it sure works a lot better than WD40.

Signature

David M  (dmacchiarolo)
http://home.triad.rr.com/redsled
T/S 53
sled351 Linux 2.4.18-14  has been up 2:41 2 users

Mike - 21 Nov 2006 23:00 GMT
> Mike, Joe,
>
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
>
> Bill

Impact is good if you can get to the nut/bolts.  The top ones are usually the tough
ones to get to.

I my case, I had the bed off to repair some frame damage and to replace the rear gas
tank.  So changing the rear shocks was a no-brainer.  The gas tank was rusted on the
underside under the straps. $150 from Canadian Tire, $750 from Ford.  Guess which one
I bought!

To your question about the torch on the rear shocks:  if you smell gas, then don't
even think of using it!  Otherwise, you'll be OK as long as you are outside with good
ventilation.

Mike
Bill Schwab - 21 Nov 2006 23:28 GMT
Mike,

> Impact is good if you can get to the nut/bolts.  The top ones are usually the tough
> ones to get to.

Thanks for the heads-up.

> I my case, I had the bed off to repair some frame damage and to replace the rear gas
> tank.  So changing the rear shocks was a no-brainer.  The gas tank was rusted on the
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> even think of using it!  Otherwise, you'll be OK as long as you are outside with good
> ventilation.

If penetrating oil, breaker bars, and impact wrenches fail for different
reasons, I'll probably resort to the pros.  Fire and octane don't mix well.

Thanks!

Bill
Bill Schwab - 22 Nov 2006 05:31 GMT
Mike,

>> Impact is good if you can get to the nut/bolts.  The top ones are
>> usually the tough
>> ones to get to.
>
> Thanks for the heads-up.

The top ones in front look like they will be the worst to reach.  An
impact wrench might actually fit elsewhere.  My 2 ft breaker bar will
hopefully take care of the top front.  It looks like it might be tricky
getting a deep enough socket in there, but there should be room for the
bar itself.  Of course, I am trying to envision how it will look with
the truck on stands and the wheel removed.

> If penetrating oil, breaker bars, and impact wrenches fail for different
> reasons, I'll probably resort to the pros.  Fire and octane don't mix well.

Now that I think about it, fire and octane DO mix - that's the problem =:0

Bill
Flasherly - 23 Nov 2006 15:44 GMT
Just did front and back on a heavily rusted ranger.  Thin/thick wall
sockets, swivels, adapters, various wrenches, etc., never seems like I
can have enough of those.  Unusual situations with a tool that fits
just right is a good feeling.  Still trying to get the metrics all
together.  Easy rollaround 2 or 3 ton jack and four-point jack stands
are safer than three.  I've a HD 3/4 ratchet & socket set (standard
though, 1"- 3 1/2" or so), also includes a nice swivel-head 3/4"
breaker bar.   Nicer yet, got the set for $39.  Been on that thing more
than a few times with a 6' length of pipe -- exploded out the insides
of black impact sockets on a steering box once.  BP Blaster and slow
and easy.  Shouldn't be so many bolts for an impact to matter that much
(up to tired forearms and aching hands).  Little wire brush and tack
hammer is sometimes all it takes.  BP Blaster and work those threads
clean with the brush, little crack here and there with the hammer to
shatter bonds, back out a few more threads from the nut, then back to
cleaning.  Repeated until everything was nice and loose.  Top bolts up
front were rusted beyond consideration - besides, the new Gabriels
included everything needed up there.  Went through the studs and bolts
with 4" Nikita grinder like hot butter (careful around brake lines).
Supposed to get a rebate - be $75 total then and they're nice shocks.
Truck sat up perky with them.  Beat out and replaced the upper control
arm after that with a 2lb mallet.  No more bumpidy-ker-clunks. $67 TRW
part - shops were asking $400+. Found a good shop alignment pit next
day for $70.  Probably got a reasonably clean truck that's not rusted
and threatening siezures - shouldn't be too major.

> The top ones in front look like they will be the worst to reach.  An

> impact wrench might actually fit elsewhere.  My 2 ft breaker bar will
> hopefully take care of the top front.  It looks like it might be tricky
> getting a deep enough socket in there, but there should be room for the
> bar itself.  Of course, I am trying to envision how it will look with
> the truck on stands and the wheel removed.
Bill Schwab - 24 Nov 2006 15:56 GMT
> Unusual situations with a tool that fits
> just right is a good feeling.  Still trying to get the metrics all
> together.  

I have an ok collection of small metric sockets, and metric combination
wrenches from Enco.  I will grab larger sockets as I need them.

> Easy rollaround 2 or 3 ton jack and four-point jack stands
> are safer than three.  

Mine are four-point.

> I've a HD 3/4 ratchet & socket set (standard
> though, 1"- 3 1/2" or so), also includes a nice swivel-head 3/4"
> breaker bar.   Nicer yet, got the set for $39.  Been on that thing more
> than a few times with a 6' length of pipe -- exploded out the insides
> of black impact sockets on a steering box once.  BP Blaster and slow
> and easy.  

I have been hearing a lot of good things about BP, and will get some
before messing with the shocks.

> Shouldn't be so many bolts for an impact to matter that much
> (up to tired forearms and aching hands).  Little wire brush and tack
> hammer is sometimes all it takes.  

The real reason I am thinking of an impact wrench is that I want an air
ratchet anyway (mostly for non-automotive work).  There are some good
deals on sets with both tools.

> BP Blaster and work those threads
> clean with the brush, little crack here and there with the hammer to
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Went through the studs and bolts
> with 4" Nikita grinder like hot butter (careful around brake lines).

I'm optimistic that penetrating oil and my breaker bar will do it.
Failing that, your solution might be about the only option.  However, I
would probably just take it to the pros if I can't get the top nuts off.

Bill
Flasherly - 25 Nov 2006 14:30 GMT
> I have an ok collection of small metric sockets, and metric combination
> wrenches from Enco.  I will grab larger sockets as I need them.

Ordered a bunch of metric sets and seems half of them are missing every
other increment. 19mm to 21mm w/ the 20 missing, etc.  Cheap Harbor
Freight stuff and doesn't matter pricewise, just odd after using
standards up till this ranger.  Pawnshop stuff for a lazy afternoon.

> I have been hearing a lot of good things about BP, and will get some
> before messing with the shocks.

Liquid Wrench but they say BP's better.  First time I ran into it was
by recommendation for a air ratchet sticking, spinning up erratically.

>  > Shouldn't be so many bolts for an impact to matter that much
> > (up to tired forearms and aching hands).  Little wire brush and tack
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> ratchet anyway (mostly for non-automotive work).  There are some good
> deals on sets with both tools.

I bought a 90psi, 60gal Campbell Hausefeld unit for a one-car house
garage.   Cut up a tire for pads beneath the three feet to keep it from
walking - beats drilling concrete and bolt setups.  Watch for sales and
got most of the airtools for $20.  Big can of airtool lubricant to keep
them happy.

>  > BP Blaster and work those threads
> > clean with the brush, little crack here and there with the hammer to
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Failing that, your solution might be about the only option.  However, I
> would probably just take it to the pros if I can't get the top nuts off.

If I can't "see it" then I start hitting the shops and asking for
advice.  Tell them what I'm thinking and whatever I'm not seeing right
or not at all, and they straighten me out. Some won't talk - some will.
Ball joints for instance.  Reading around in here and the likes about
how they're pressed into the control arm.  One guy in parts autosupply
says he had used a BJoint press to get them out of Rangers before.
Another guy at a regular repair shop keeps a rental bay for sideworking
at night. Stopped in late and he said -nah- do the whole upper control
arm.  That and I had the control arm prices bassackwards.  $67 TRW
controll arm w/ pressed ball-joint part at Advanced Auto, whereas
AutoZone (and others) couldn't pull anything up but an individual ball
joint for $30.  Well, I got both and everything (including a AZ rental
press) and ended up returning all the AutoZone parts.  Would have been
a ball-joint nightmare in comparison to just replacing the whole
control arm - trying to press out the balljoint on the truck or even
taking it off and salvaging the control arm with my 100lb benchvice and
the rental press for the balljoint.  Guy side working was dead right -
few bucks more for the whole assembly made the difference between a
couple hours and no telling when (my favorite is taking in pressed
parts into the household refrigerator prior to reassembly).

Get the new shock - hold it side by side to the old.  Put the tools to
it and partly disassemble - look for problems beforehand.  Sometimes I
keep and take my own parts in if there's a problem.  It's a mixed bag,
depending, and can go either way.  Sometimes it's convenient if all
they're doing is sitting around scratching their a.ses, sometimes
they'll ask if I bring my own eggs when I go to a restraunt for
breakfast.  I was getting $200 quotes on the control arm w/out labor.
Bill Schwab - 22 Nov 2006 07:13 GMT
Hello all,

> I have the Hayne's manual.  It seems clear enough, except for the
> additional support on the axle, which I _think_ conflicts with the
> jacking instructions.

The picture in my head was vivid, but incorrect.  The front end is
indeed a twin I-beam, and the recommended jacking point is under the
radius arm.  So far, all I have seen are instructions for changing a
tire.  Any thoughts on getting a pair of jack stands under the front?
Raising one side at a time, perhaps in a couple of steps comes to mind.
 Is there an accepted procedure?

Bill
Jeff Strickland - 21 Nov 2006 00:49 GMT
The last time I bought shocks, the shop charged $10 each to install them.
That has got to be the best $40 I've ever spent. The book was confusing as
to which shocks were needed for the application (lifted CJ5), and it turns
out the guy made the wrong selection first. The bolts were rusted and bent,
the threads mashed. I see no point in replacing a shock when the shop will
do it for 10 bucks.

> Hello all,
>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> Bill
Tom Gardner - 24 Nov 2006 04:39 GMT
> Hello all,
>
> I am prioritizing the repairs needed by my "new" 1996 F150 (75k miles).
> The brakes and radial arm bushings are probably next.  Those are _not_ on
> my DIY list.

<snip>

I thought I was just getting old when I took my E-350 to Sears for shocks
but they had a super sale on their best with free or almost free install.  I
knew I did the right thing when they had three guys working on one shock at
a time with very BIG tools and very short cuss words.  I overheard one
complaining that "Those are always a bitch"  Your F-150 might be better but
I really think about getting cut-up or really hurt anymore.  Brakes, I'll
do, shocks aren't worth it!
Bill Schwab - 24 Nov 2006 15:53 GMT
Tom,

>> I am prioritizing the repairs needed by my "new" 1996 F150 (75k miles).
>> The brakes and radial arm bushings are probably next.  Those are _not_ on
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> I really think about getting cut-up or really hurt anymore.  Brakes, I'll
> do, shocks aren't worth it!

No argument, I have it a little backwards in terms of cost/benefit.
However, brakes must be correct; lives depend on it.  Ditto steering.
The shocks look like something I can handle, and it will be good
experience for me.  Eventually I will start thinking in terms of
convenience vs. cost; for now, I am picking battles that I should be
able to win.  Brake jobs and critical suspension components aren't my
first pick.

Bill
David M - 24 Nov 2006 16:48 GMT
> Tom,
>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> Bill

Shocks *are* critical suspension components....

Signature

David M  (dmacchiarolo)
http://home.triad.rr.com/redsled
T/S 53
sled351 Linux 2.4.18-14  has been up 3 days 2:08

Bill Schwab - 24 Nov 2006 18:17 GMT
>> No argument, I have it a little backwards in terms of cost/benefit.
>> However, brakes must be correct; lives depend on it.  Ditto steering.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Shocks *are* critical suspension components....

True, but they are dampers bolted into place as opposed to press-fit
supports.  It seems a lot better place to start than a brake job or
replacing bushings.

Bill
Tom Gardner - 26 Nov 2006 03:32 GMT
>>> No argument, I have it a little backwards in terms of cost/benefit.
>>> However, brakes must be correct; lives depend on it.  Ditto steering.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Bill

Brakes are simple, just replace EVERYTHING with new, good quality parts.
Flush and bleed.  Best of luck with everything.
Bill Schwab - 26 Nov 2006 14:33 GMT
Tom,

> Brakes are simple, just replace EVERYTHING with new, good quality parts.
> Flush and bleed.  Best of luck with everything.

You are not the first to tell me that brakes are simple.  I believe it,
but can't (yet anyway) bring myself to tear apart the things that make
the car/truck stop on demand.

While on the subject, what do you do about rotors?  One of the first
things I noticed was a rotor problem.  Turns out the left one is shot
from metal on metal damage; the right can probably be machined.

Thanks,

Bill
Mac Cool - 26 Nov 2006 18:02 GMT
Bill Schwab:
> ...what do you do about rotors?

I replaced the rear rotors and brake pads on my F150 having never done it
before and it took me about 45 minutes with a helper. If you can snap
Legos together you can do brakes.
Signature

Mac Cool

David M - 26 Nov 2006 23:53 GMT
> Tom,
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Bill

The rotors *may* be able to be turned down, as long as they are a minimum
thickness.  Although, I don't think they are too expensive, so it might be
easier just to get new ones.  I've got 124k miles on mine, and they are in
good shape.

Signature

David M  (dmacchiarolo)
http://home.triad.rr.com/redsled
T/S 53
sled351 Linux 2.4.18-14  has been up 5 days 9:13

Bill Schwab - 27 Nov 2006 03:04 GMT
David,

> The rotors *may* be able to be turned down, as long as they are a minimum
> thickness.  Although, I don't think they are too expensive, so it might be
> easier just to get new ones.  I've got 124k miles on mine, and they are in
> good shape.

The first thing I noted in driving the truck was that the rotors were in
some distress.  Turns out, the left rotor took a real beating.  The
mechanic I have trusted for years now tells me it was almost certainly
from metal-metal contact, and that it needs to go.  That's good enough
for me.  He says the right rotor can be machined.

Bill
Matt Macchiarolo - 26 Nov 2006 04:12 GMT
> I thought I was just getting old when I took my E-350 to Sears for shocks
> but they had a super sale on their best with free or almost free install.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> but I really think about getting cut-up or really hurt anymore.  Brakes,
> I'll do, shocks aren't worth it!
I recently replaced my shocks on my Superduty, all four in about an hour,
with air tools. No need for jackstands, the only prep I needed to to was
turn the front wheels to get better access to the bottom front shock bolts,
and remove the spare for better access to the top rear bolts. Of course I
soaked all the fasteners in PB Blaster for a couple days beforehand, made it
a lot easier.
Tropical - 26 Nov 2006 23:51 GMT
I just recently did the shocks on a 92 f-150.  Plan on spending time doing
it.  (You might consider a tetanus (sp) shot as well if yours looks like
mine. ) I used the Haynes manual for the information.  I believe mine were
original (139k miles).  What a nightmare.  Not that it was difficult, but
trying to get the nuts and bolts off the bottom was terrible.  I think the
Haynes manual recommends removing the top of the shock first, but I did the
bottom as that was the more difficult end. I believe I spent 3 hours per on
the front ones (rear ones are going to wait until the spring.)  I tried
penetrating oil (PB) and an impact wrench and nothing..  Ended up using a
cut-off wheel to slice the bolts off.  A large breaker bar unthreaded the
bolt the rest of the way.  As for the top of the shock, well, I did manage
to start turning it with a long socket, but it just sheared the top of the
shock bolt off.  I was glad, that was the easy route :)  Re installing
should be pretty easy, just make sure the bracket is clean where you put the
bottom of the shock in, that makes it slide in easier.
I put a jackstand under the frame on the corner I was working and also left
the floor jack under the arm I was working on, but lowered it some.
I'm fairly new to auto repair and I handled it OK, just way underestimated
the time.  Read the Haynes manual a couple of times and look over the truck
a few times before you attempt it, I think you'll be fine.
The rear of mine looks like it is going to be just as much fun.  I might try
only lifting the truck a little with jackstands under the frame and keeping
the wheels on the ground, this way the axle can't move anyway.  I'm curious
as to how it goes for you though.
Good luck!

> Hello all,
>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> Bill
Bill Schwab - 27 Nov 2006 03:45 GMT
> I just recently did the shocks on a 92 f-150.  Plan on spending time doing
> it.  (You might consider a tetanus (sp) shot as well if yours looks like
> mine. )

It's not too bad.

> I used the Haynes manual for the information.

Don't necessarily believe them about the thermostat.  Sealant got me out
of it, but I was impressed at how wrong they were about the parts.  In
fairness, some things were changed, and maybe the current cover is from
a different year??

> I believe mine were
> original (139k miles).  What a nightmare.  Not that it was difficult, but
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> I put a jackstand under the frame on the corner I was working and also left
> the floor jack under the arm I was working on, but lowered it some.

Sounds reasonable to me.  As I read Haynes, they say to place the jack
under the radius arm (1996 w/ twin I-beam), but that seems a little
nutty.  The frame seems a lot better, as that will allow the wheel to
"fall" giving much better access to the top.

> I'm fairly new to auto repair and I handled it OK, just way underestimated
> the time.  Read the Haynes manual a couple of times and look over the truck
> a few times before you attempt it, I think you'll be fine.

I am new to auto repair myself, and am trying to pick battles that will
teach me something w/o too much risk to life and property.  If I save a
few bucks at the same time, all the better.

> The rear of mine looks like it is going to be just as much fun.  I might try
> only lifting the truck a little with jackstands under the frame and keeping
> the wheels on the ground, this way the axle can't move anyway.  I'm curious
> as to how it goes for you though.

Interesting idea.  I will report on it, but I'm not in a hurry.

Bill
David M - 27 Nov 2006 10:30 GMT
> I used the Haynes manual for the information.
>
> Sounds reasonable to me.  As I read Haynes, they say to place the jack
> under the radius arm (1996 w/ twin I-beam), but that seems a little
> nutty.  The frame seems a lot better, as that will allow the wheel to
> "fall" giving much better access to the top.

If you're serious about learning to do some things, you might want to get
a better manual.

www.helminc.com

They are expensive, but they are the original factory service
manuals.

You can usually find them on E-bay as well.

Signature

David M  (dmacchiarolo)
http://home.triad.rr.com/redsled
T/S 53
sled351 Linux 2.4.18-14  has been up 5 days 19:46

Bill Schwab - 28 Nov 2006 15:44 GMT
David,

>> I used the Haynes manual for the information.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> They are expensive, but they are the original factory service
> manuals.

I ordered one from them just over a week ago; it should be arriving any
day now.  Thanks for mentioning it though!

Bill
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.