Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Ford / Ford Trucks / March 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Looked at another truck today...

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Nate Nagel - 20 Mar 2007 06:04 GMT
In my search to find a truck that is a) practical and b) not boring, I
ended up looking at a '72 F100 short box this evening.  What a cute
little truck, although it ended up being a lot rustier than it appeared
in the pics.  Such is life.  Fortunately, what it really needs is a
front clip (mostly rad support and inner fenders, along with some
patches on the rear of the outers) and door skins, and all of same seem
readily available except for the hood.  Box is solid but has some rust
at the seam on the outer skin which could probably be blasted and
repainted.  It's a runner, too, and has current inspection (although I'm
curious about whether it'll pass again with the sheetmetal so swiss
cheezy... I'd call it solid, but barely.)

Questions.

1) The brakes were, quite frankly, pathetic.  I'm used to driving my
Studebakers which have pretty good 11/10 inch drums; this truck did not
stop anywhere near as readily.  Is this normal for non-power drums on
this model truck, or does it need a brake job?  (I'd prefer you told me
the latter, because if this is normal, I'm gonna have to swap to power,
discs, or both.)

2) What in your opinion is a fair price for a presentable, running truck
with some rust issues that will need to be addressed "sometime" - truck
is mostly original but has been converted to a floor shift.  Drivetrain
is 302/3-speed/9 inch.  Will probably need full lube service/repack
bearings/etc. but otherwise ready to go, with the exception of brakes
mentioned above.  No options at all that I could see.  I think the
owner's asking price is a little high, but I don't want to say what it
is so as not to prejudice responses.

As you can probably tell, I'm kind of taken with the little bugger and
am considering going with "old and cool" over "new and boring yet
practical."  Could use some gentle advice though as Fords are not my
area of expertise.

thanks,

nate

Signature

replace "roosters" with "cox" to reply.
http://members.cox.net/njnagel

Jeff Strickland - 23 Mar 2007 02:57 GMT
> In my search to find a truck that is a) practical and b) not boring, I
> ended up looking at a '72 F100 short box this evening.  What a cute little
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
>
> nate

Fixing brakes and body parts on a Ford is alot like fixing brakes and body
parts on a Chevy. If you know brakes and body parts, then you'll be in good
shape.

Having said that, you went to great lengths to describe rust, then closed
with the thought that is was solid. It's either rusty or solid, seldom both.
And if rusty and solid, then the rust doesn't matter.
Nate Nagel - 23 Mar 2007 03:11 GMT
>> In my search to find a truck that is a) practical and b) not boring, I
>> ended up looking at a '72 F100 short box this evening.  What a cute
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
> body parts on a Chevy. If you know brakes and body parts, then you'll be
> in good shape.

Right, but I've never driven a Ford with drum brakes other than this
one.  when they're working right, are they decent?

> Having said that, you went to great lengths to describe rust, then
> closed with the thought that is was solid. It's either rusty or solid,
> seldom both. And if rusty and solid, then the rust doesn't matter.

It was actually weird.  The bed was spectacular, the underhood
sheetmetal was a wreck.  Maybe was parked halfway under a lean-to or
something?

I've pretty much decided to pass, anyway, after seeing a much nicer
truck on eBay end for less than what this guy was asking.

nate

Signature

replace "roosters" with "cox" to reply.
http://members.cox.net/njnagel

Jeff Strickland - 23 Mar 2007 18:12 GMT
>>> In my search to find a truck that is a) practical and b) not boring, I
>>> ended up looking at a '72 F100 short box this evening.  What a cute
[quoted text clipped - 53 lines]
>
> nate

Manual brakes take a lot of pedal pressure, I'm not sure that Fords take any
more pressure than others. My Jeep CJ5 has manual brakes, and I'm amazed
when I take it out because I can hardly bring the damn thing to a stop the
first few times I try. After a half dozen stops or so, the brakes still work
the same, but I feel better because I make the necessary adjustments. I
suspect the brakes on the truck you tested -- and passed on -- were probably
okay, or just needed bleeding.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.