>> In my search to find a truck that is a) practical and b) not boring, I
>> ended up looking at a '72 F100 short box this evening. What a cute
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
> body parts on a Chevy. If you know brakes and body parts, then you'll be
> in good shape.
Right, but I've never driven a Ford with drum brakes other than this
one. when they're working right, are they decent?
> Having said that, you went to great lengths to describe rust, then
> closed with the thought that is was solid. It's either rusty or solid,
> seldom both. And if rusty and solid, then the rust doesn't matter.
It was actually weird. The bed was spectacular, the underhood
sheetmetal was a wreck. Maybe was parked halfway under a lean-to or
something?
I've pretty much decided to pass, anyway, after seeing a much nicer
truck on eBay end for less than what this guy was asking.
nate

Signature
replace "roosters" with "cox" to reply.
http://members.cox.net/njnagel
Jeff Strickland - 23 Mar 2007 18:12 GMT
>>> In my search to find a truck that is a) practical and b) not boring, I
>>> ended up looking at a '72 F100 short box this evening. What a cute
[quoted text clipped - 53 lines]
>
> nate
Manual brakes take a lot of pedal pressure, I'm not sure that Fords take any
more pressure than others. My Jeep CJ5 has manual brakes, and I'm amazed
when I take it out because I can hardly bring the damn thing to a stop the
first few times I try. After a half dozen stops or so, the brakes still work
the same, but I feel better because I make the necessary adjustments. I
suspect the brakes on the truck you tested -- and passed on -- were probably
okay, or just needed bleeding.