Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Ford / Ford Trucks / March 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

FORD Expedition wheels mount on E-250 cargo van?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
datakoll@yahoo.com - 25 Mar 2007 23:18 GMT
what sources and options are there for mounting a wider front wheel
than rear and a wider rear than stock on the E-250 cargo van?
Steve Barker - 25 Mar 2007 23:25 GMT
tire and wheel store.

Signature

Steve Barker

YOU should be the one
controlling YOUR car.
Check out:
www.lightsout.org

> what sources and options are there for mounting a wider front wheel
> than rear and a wider rear than stock on the E-250 cargo van?
Jeff Strickland - 25 Mar 2007 23:28 GMT
Wider front than rear? Why would you want that?

Wider than stock is a reasonable question, and I don't know the answer. But
the only way a wider wheel on the front would give any benefit at all is if
there was Front Wheel Drive, which your Econoline van certainly hasn't got.

> what sources and options are there for mounting a wider front wheel
> than rear and a wider rear than stock on the E-250 cargo van?
datakoll@yahoo.com - 26 Mar 2007 00:38 GMT
weight's upfront: more contact patch with greater weight gives better
turn in, grip, and balance.

the expedition's rims go 7.5 wide over the cargo van's ?? 7"
cargo van takes 225mm stock
expedition goes to ?  265mm

all 16" rims steel only
Matt Macchiarolo - 26 Mar 2007 00:54 GMT
E250 uses different lug pattern than Expedition, so you'll have to find new
wheels or change out the hubs, which I don't recommend.

> weight's upfront: more contact patch with greater weight gives better
> turn in, grip, and balance.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> all 16" rims steel only
Jeff Strickland - 28 Mar 2007 17:26 GMT
You do not want wider tires in front than in the rear. Period.

You may want wider tires all around, and I agree completely that there can
be benefits, and I'd argue there is no downside at all.

It appears to me that your choice in tires will affect your gearing. You
need to consult your tire store for availability of the optiions, and the
pricing -- I'm not sure, but I think the tire size you will need is going to
be rare. Assuming you have a 225/75x16, and you want a 265, you will need to
find an aspect ratio (the second number) of 65 to retain an overall
diameter. If you currently have a set of 15s that are 225/75x15, then you
can replace them with 265/60x16 and have an overall diameter that is
identical for all practical purposes.

You should have plenty of room for a half inch wider rim. You are aware that
you are putting on tires that are 40mm wider than what you currently have,
right? 40mm  is an inch and a half, which is an inch more than the new rims.
This will fit okay, but will have a bit of an offroad tire appearance.

> weight's upfront: more contact patch with greater weight gives better
> turn in, grip, and balance.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> all 16" rims steel only
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.