>I was looking at used full sized trucks (F150, Chev 1500). Something with a
>8 foot bed. I was surprized that they use the same ~1/8" thick steel U
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>I see they use a boxed frame in the newer trucks but it is not as tall. For
>a deeper bed I'd guess.
>>I was looking at used full sized trucks (F150, Chev 1500). Something with
>>a
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> -----------------
> TheSnoMan.com
You bought up good points about the box frame. I notice that they paint them
(for good reason).
Saving weight on the vehicle's very foundation seems dumb to me. Take a 18
foot long piece a steel that is 12" wide (unfolded C channel) and 1/8"
thick)
216" x 12" x 1/8" x .27 = 87.48 punds (.27 is the density of steel
pounds/cu in). Adding an extra 1/32" increases strength quite a bit yet adds
only about 21 pounds or 42" total for both frame rails.
John
Joe - 10 Aug 2007 03:55 GMT
>>>I was looking at used full sized trucks (F150, Chev 1500). Something with
>>>a
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
> adds only about 21 pounds or 42" total for both frame rails.
> John
That's true, and steel is very very cheap. 42 pounds of steel would only
cost a few dollars. Too bad. I would bet they're not worried about the
cost, but they are worried about shaving weight.
SnoMan - 10 Aug 2007 15:22 GMT
> I would bet they're not worried about the
>cost, but they are worried about shaving weight.
I think they are worried about both. Every new design or change seems
to also focus on it being cheaper to make too be it from less labor,
less materials or both.
-----------------
TheSnoMan.com
SC Tom - 10 Aug 2007 21:09 GMT
>>>I was looking at used full sized trucks (F150, Chev 1500). Something with
>>>a
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
> adds only about 21 pounds or 42" total for both frame rails.
> John
Using on-line prices and weights, I found this info for boxed steel (not C
channel):
4x2x.120x216= $111.78 85.5 pounds.
4x2x.188x216= $186.30 123.7 pounds.
The extra $75 would probably be somewhat of a concern for thousands of
vehicles (granted, the bulk prices would probably be considerably less), and
the extra pounds might cut a half mile per gallon from their CAFE ratings,
so I would think that the manufacturers would be concerned with both the
price and the weight somewhat equally. Gotta do what you can to save money
and increase gas mileage or they'll get some other fool to be their CEO.
Never mind that the vehicle bodies won't last near as long as they used to.
The sooner they break, the sooner the sucker. . .er. . . customer will buy
another one.
SC Tom