Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Ford / Ford Trucks / March 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Timing Belt or Timing Chain

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Joe727 - 17 Mar 2008 02:51 GMT
Hi - I have a 1997 Ford Ranger 2.3 Liter Engine with a 5 Speed Automatic
transmission.  I bought this truck *used* about 2 years ago when it had
97,000 miles on it.

Right now is has a bit over 140,000.

Question 1 - Does this engine have a timing belt or timing chain?

I have no idea if the timing chain/belt has ever been replaced.

Question 2 - If it has a timing belt, should I take it in now to have it
replaced?

BTW - this truck runs great.

Thanks

Joe
John Myers - 17 Mar 2008 04:54 GMT
Timing belt. The 2.3 is not an interference motor, so if it does break, you
won't trash the motor. However, with that kind of mileage and no knowledge
of the timing belt's history, I would say at 140k you should change it ASAP
to avoid the inconvenience of being stranded.

> Hi - I have a 1997 Ford Ranger 2.3 Liter Engine with a 5 Speed Automatic
> transmission.  I bought this truck *used* about 2 years ago when it had
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Joe
Joe727 - 17 Mar 2008 16:39 GMT
Ok - thanks for the info.

Joe

> Timing belt. The 2.3 is not an interference motor, so if it does break,
> you won't trash the motor. However, with that kind of mileage and no
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>>
>> Joe
scrape - 18 Mar 2008 12:32 GMT
>Timing belt. The 2.3 is not an interference motor, so if it does break, you
>won't trash the motor. However, with that kind of mileage and no knowledge
>of the timing belt's history, I would say at 140k you should change it ASAP
>to avoid the inconvenience of being stranded.

Similar question: is the '99 2.5 an interference engine?

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.