Timing belt. The 2.3 is not an interference motor, so if it does break, you
won't trash the motor. However, with that kind of mileage and no knowledge
of the timing belt's history, I would say at 140k you should change it ASAP
to avoid the inconvenience of being stranded.
> Hi - I have a 1997 Ford Ranger 2.3 Liter Engine with a 5 Speed Automatic
> transmission. I bought this truck *used* about 2 years ago when it had
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Joe
Joe727 - 17 Mar 2008 16:39 GMT
Ok - thanks for the info.
Joe
> Timing belt. The 2.3 is not an interference motor, so if it does break,
> you won't trash the motor. However, with that kind of mileage and no
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>>
>> Joe
scrape - 18 Mar 2008 12:32 GMT
>Timing belt. The 2.3 is not an interference motor, so if it does break, you
>won't trash the motor. However, with that kind of mileage and no knowledge
>of the timing belt's history, I would say at 140k you should change it ASAP
>to avoid the inconvenience of being stranded.
Similar question: is the '99 2.5 an interference engine?