Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Ford / Ford Trucks / January 2009

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

300 lifter cover gaskets?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Nate Nagel - 31 Dec 2008 13:54 GMT
Is any brand preferable to any other?  I know that when I had the oil
pan gasket replaced the mechanic used what looks like neoprene.  Is
there something similar available for the lifter covers?  I ought to be
able to handle those myself...  just dreaming of a leak free engine.  I
have tightened every bolt but still it marks its territory

nate

Signature

replace "roosters" with "cox" to reply.
http://members.cox.net/njnagel

Nate Nagel - 31 Dec 2008 13:56 GMT
> Is any brand preferable to any other?  I know that when I had the oil
> pan gasket replaced the mechanic used what looks like neoprene.  Is
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> nate

Forgot, one more question I wanted to ask... what color would the engine
block etc. have been painted?  All the covers are a light grey but I
don't see any evidence of paint on the block at all.  Would it have been
the same color?  This is in a '93 pickup.

nate

Signature

replace "roosters" with "cox" to reply.
http://members.cox.net/njnagel

lugnut - 31 Dec 2008 15:13 GMT
>> Is any brand preferable to any other?  I know that when I had the oil
>> pan gasket replaced the mechanic used what looks like neoprene.  Is
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
>nate

In that vintage, Ford did not paint the blocks or heads in cars or trucks.  The
metallurgist I was working with at the time said there was no benefit other than
esthetics and, possibly, a downside since poorly sealing/bonded paint may serve
to trap unnecessary moisture next to the metal.  It seems that cast iron is a
bit like aluminum in that the surface oxidizes providing protection against deep
corrosion.  There are chemical treatments for the metal surface that will
greatly enhance the corrosion protection/resistance of metal.  I suppose Ford
just decided there was no great cost benefit in painting them.  Personally, I
have cleaned, treated and painted every one I have built just because I like the
look of a clean painted or coated engine much better than a chunk of rust.  You
might say it is a source of pride in your work.  I do not live in the rust belt
and corrosion of the engine block is not a major consideration.

Lugnut
Virus proof Linux user - 08 Jan 2009 16:15 GMT
>> Is any brand preferable to any other?  I know that when I had the oil
>> pan gasket replaced the mechanic used what looks like neoprene.  Is
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> nate

Though my original 1993 F-150 valve cover is grey, the engine appears to
have never been painted.
ds549@webtv.net - 31 Dec 2008 17:22 GMT
i think the fel pro gasket for that is rubber. ive been useing gm type
be sealer instead of premade valve cover,lifter cover ,oil pan gaskets
and it doesnt leak. chevy dealer has it. lucas

----------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.minibite.com/america/malone.htm
Oren - 31 Dec 2008 23:50 GMT
>Is any brand preferable to any other?  I know that when I had the oil
>pan gasket replaced the mechanic used what looks like neoprene.  Is
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>nate

Make sure the cover is not warped. Torque the cover bolts, again after
the engine is warm. In the correct sequence.

You might try a pliable permatex product from the local auto store.
SC Tom - 01 Jan 2009 17:04 GMT
>>Is any brand preferable to any other?  I know that when I had the oil
>>pan gasket replaced the mechanic used what looks like neoprene.  Is
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> You might try a pliable permatex product from the local auto store.

+1 for Oren's reply. Also check that the metal around the bolt holes hasn't
been pulled in from over-tightening. If they have, you can tap them back
flat with a ball peen hammer.

SC Tom
N8N - 08 Jan 2009 16:29 GMT
> >>Is any brand preferable to any other?  I know that when I had the oil
> >>pan gasket replaced the mechanic used what looks like neoprene.  Is
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> SC Tom

The cover doesn't bolt through the gasket surface, there are bolts
through the center of the cover.  I believe those are supposed to have
grommets, after looking up the gasket set online, maybe that is part
of the problem?  If the grommets disintegrated that would explain why
the bolts were so loose.

nate
SC Tom - 08 Jan 2009 21:30 GMT
On Jan 1, 12:04 pm, "SC Tom" <t...@sc.net> wrote:
> "Oren" <O...@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> SC Tom

The cover doesn't bolt through the gasket surface, there are bolts
through the center of the cover.  I believe those are supposed to have
grommets, after looking up the gasket set online, maybe that is part
of the problem?  If the grommets disintegrated that would explain why
the bolts were so loose.

nate
-----
Thanks! I was thinking of the older covers that bolted around the lip and
through the gasket.

SC Tom
Nate Nagel - 08 Jan 2009 23:08 GMT
> On Jan 1, 12:04 pm, "SC Tom" <t...@sc.net> wrote:
>> "Oren" <O...@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>
> SC Tom

I think they were always like that, we may be talking about two
different covers.  The valve cover on the head does in fact bolt through
the gasket but as far as I can tell if it is leaking it is only at the
back.  The side cover on the block, the one that covers the lifters and
pushrods, is bolted through the center of the cover, and while I can't
100% confirm it's leaking, the area around it certainly isn't dry.

nate

Signature

replace "roosters" with "cox" to reply.
http://members.cox.net/njnagel

SC Tom - 08 Jan 2009 23:47 GMT
>> On Jan 1, 12:04 pm, "SC Tom" <t...@sc.net> wrote:
>>> "Oren" <O...@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
>
> nate

Start with a bucket full of rags and a can of lacquer thinner. DO NOT get
any on rubber, plastic, or paint :(  . I like it because it leaves no
residue, and evaporates quickly. Starting with the side cover, remove it,
clean the cover and the area around and under it good, and use a new gasket
and center bolt grommets. RTV is good along with the gasket. I'd use a thin
layer on both the cover and the block. After driving a while, you'll be able
to see whether or not it's leaking from there. Or just go ahead and do the
whole thing, with both the side covers and the valve covers.

I had a '64 Ford 390 that had the rear-of-the-valve-cover leak and I had a
heck of a time stopping it. At that time, the gasket was 4 pieces (what the
heck were they thinking?), and I ended up using gasket shellac to 'glue' the
gasket to the cover, then the old red Permatex on the ends of the pieces and
on the mounting surface to the heads. Whew, what fun!!

SC Tom
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.