Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Ford / Ford Trucks / July 2009

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

higher octane = higher mpg for 2002 V10

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
RTimothy - 24 Jul 2009 03:46 GMT
Hi again,
             In a conversation with a truck mechanic, octane came up.
My 2002 F53 chassis with a V10 has only been run on 87 octane.
He went into a discussion about lower octane firing more suddenly
that higher octane fires more slowly but longer in duration but burns
more completely.
I'm wondering if the electronics of the 2002 V10 engine would adjust
to a higher octane resulting in a little better mpg.
It wouldn't take very much of mpg improvement to off set the extra 20
cents out of 260 cents.
Has anyone, tried or tested the value of using higher octane on this
engine?
             Tim fm CT
Rowbotth - 24 Jul 2009 03:57 GMT
> Hi again,
>               In a conversation with a truck mechanic, octane came up.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> engine?
>               Tim fm CT

Generally speaking, if the Owners Manual doesn't tell you to use a
higher octane, don't.  It gives you no benefit.  And costs more money.  
Trust your automotive engineers.

(Well, maybe not "Generally Speaking".  Maybe "Always"?)

HR
Ralph E Lindberg - 24 Jul 2009 13:36 GMT
In article
<rowbotth-6A3C07.20571223072009@newsfarm.iad.highwinds-media.com>,

> > Hi again,
> >               In a conversation with a truck mechanic, octane came up.
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> HR

I did a trial in my 99 (pre three-valve and crank mods) and found no
detectable difference between 87 and 89 and 93, other then what I was
speeding on gas

Signature

--------------------------------------------------------
Personal e-mail is the n7bsn but at amsat.org
This posting address is a spam-trap and seldom read
RV and Camping FAQ can be found at
http://www.ralphandellen.us/rv

PeterD - 24 Jul 2009 14:52 GMT
>Hi again,
>              In a conversation with a truck mechanic, octane came up.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>engine?
>              Tim fm CT

Well, this is not a Ford example, but...

My Saab turbo... From the owners manual: "For best fuel economy use
regular gas. For best performance use preimum".

Now, I could give f* all about economy, after all I drive that Saab
about 500 miles a year, so I use premium, but were I to consider
maximizing my economy I'd sure try regular.

Now, closer to your Ford, my Dodge Hemi says Premium (only). I'm cheap
with that truck (gets many more miles) and usually fill with regular.
I've not noticed a change in economy in it (if there is, it is
nominal) but performance is not as good as with premium.
Jeff Strickland - 24 Jul 2009 23:11 GMT
>>Hi again,
>>              In a conversation with a truck mechanic, octane came up.
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> I've not noticed a change in economy in it (if there is, it is
> nominal) but performance is not as good as with premium.

Your Saab Turbo _wants_ premium fuel, but can adjust itself for regular fuel
if you don't mind the performance degradation. Instead of 0 to 60 in 4.5
seconds on premium, it takes 6 seconds on regular. Most people would never
know the difference if that's all it is.
PeterD - 24 Jul 2009 23:55 GMT
>>>Hi again,
>>>              In a conversation with a truck mechanic, octane came up.
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>seconds on premium, it takes 6 seconds on regular. Most people would never
>know the difference if that's all it is.

<BG>
Jeff Strickland - 24 Jul 2009 23:08 GMT
> Hi again,
>              In a conversation with a truck mechanic, octane came up.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> engine?
>              Tim fm CT

If your engine calls for 91 octane, and you've been putting in 87 or 89,
then the engine will adjust itself for the lower octrane. If it calls for
87, you will get no benefit from from using 91. Well, your wallet won't be
as heavy as you have grown accustomed to, and that might be a benefit of
sorts.
None4U - 27 Jul 2009 03:19 GMT
>> Hi again,
>>              In a conversation with a truck mechanic, octane came up.
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
>>> Not really, Its not this cut and dry.

If it calls for 91 , Its probably a performance car like a VW, Saab or
Corvette  or other. And the engine timing may not be adjuistable down to 87
or 89, or adjust to a lower octane as it might be a bumped compression ratio
requiring the octane. This is why they say , use 91 only.   If it can adjust
down then you can use 87.  If the car has variable timing for octane then a
higher octane should allow higher mpg/ power  if the timing adjust for it  .
If it doesnt adjust then the higher octane might be  wasted. Might , because
higher octane gas is slightly less volatile then a lower octane with less
additives to raise the octane in the first place.  In the case of some gas
stastions. They just mix their tank of 91 with the tank of 87 in the pump .
To pump 89 in your car.     However if the car has a minor problem like a
worn egr washer, running hot, or a slightly advanced timing. Or just needs a
tune up.   It might run better on the higher octane. stop pinging, or get
better mpg.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.