>Actually, the better method is to recover the system and apply a deep
>vacuum.... allow the system to "rest" while observing any vacuum drop. It is
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>"tattletales", add dye and recharge the system with the correct amount of
>R134a.
In a perfect world, this would get done to all cars. And repair
shops would charge reasonable labor rates and parts prices for that
simple and routine work...
But the world isn't perfect - witness all the witless people
thinking that one of those shop-air powered venturi "vacuum pumps" is
a deep enough vacuum for proper AC work. You can't get anywhere near
the 50 microns and below that you need with one.
I have a Universal Refrigerant Technician license, and the hand
tools, manifolds, and a leak detector from a few years working in the
refrigeration industry - but no recovery machine or oil diffusion
vacuum pump, I always used the companies' and don't have my own.
I even have to take my own car in and have someone else service it
if the AC system needs to be recovered and evacuated.
> "Topping off" the system is a fools errand and runs the chance of
>allowing a sealant or other virus into the system (rendering it
>unserviceable in the eyes of any competent shop) or resulting in an
>overcharge that can damage the compressor.
Which is why I said you HAVE TO have a proper gauge manifold and an
accurate thermometer at a bare minimum before even thinking about
'topping off' the system. You have to see the high and low sides, and
know the system temperatures to know what's going on in there before
doing anything - and the one-gauge low side "Suicide Kits" at Pep Boys
won't tell you, especially since sight glasses have gone away.
And you really should have access to an electronic leak detector -
if it starts screaming when you put the sensing tip by the compressor
crank seal or at a hose connection, you stop and have a pro look at
the car.
If the leak is very small and not economical to fix, with R134 you
leave it alone. With R-12, you have to get pickier.
>Far too many systems have had added damage from improper repair
>attempts...... what could have been an expeditious repair is turned into a
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>that brought about the demise of R12..... If we fail to learn from history,
>we are doomed to repeat it...
The Kyoto Protocol is a joke - we should be conserving, recovering
and recycling refrigerants simply because it's the Right Thing To Do,
not because we are forced to based on some dubious science. R-12 and
other CFC's and HCFC's are still widely available (and widely vented
to the atmosphere) in the third world.
The trick is to find something that works better before we throw out
the old materials and methods. R-12 is still the best solution
(overall system efficiency and ease of use) for automotive AC - R-134
certainly does work, but not as well. And it's horrid for a system
conversion, you need more evaporator and condenser core area for the
same overall system BTUH capacity.
And it's getting nuts in the Commercial Refrigeration field -
they've got at least two dozen totally different refrigerants being
thrown into service, each one with it's own advantages and problems.
Gone are the days when you could carry a bunch of R-22 and one bottle
of R-502 for the oddball Carrier, and cover any system you ran across.
>Now... I'm going to sit back and wait for the first self righteous bastuhd
>to tell me it is "his" air I am breathing and it is his choice as to whether
>or not he will foul it...
Don't look at me...
I think the science is bunk and we can't release enough CFC's into
the atmosphere to make a difference, especially when you compare it to
the millions of tons of that stuff coming out of just one big volcanic
eruption - but I'll still follow the rules on the off chance that we
eventually find out I'm wrong.
By the time they can prove a real connection and actual damage, it
might well be far too late to do anything about it.
--<< Bruce >>--
Jim Warman - 07 Aug 2006 09:46 GMT
I liked everything you were saying until the last paragraph or so.... We
have NO CHOICE when it comes to a volcanic eruption... this is something we
cannot change, avert, alter, defer, avoid, mitigate, delay or stop.....
However, when it comes to intentionally releasing this stuff into the
atmosphere, we have every opportunity to "change, avert, alter, defer,
avoid, mitigate, delay or stop" the process....
Here are two statements - "The volcano released bad stuff into the air....
so I did it too.".
"The volcano was going to burn down my neighbours house, but I did it
first....".
There should be no need, what-so-ever, to mandate environmental
responsibilty - yet, even WITH legislation - environmental resposnibility
seems to be a poorly received concept.
>>Actually, the better method is to recover the system and apply a deep
>>vacuum.... allow the system to "rest" while observing any vacuum drop. It
[quoted text clipped - 92 lines]
>
> --<< Bruce >>--