Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Ford / Ford Cars / August 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

95 Bronco 5.8 idle problems - new code 332

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
john - 26 Aug 2007 18:37 GMT
Hello,
Long story short, I found that my ACTS had been left out of the
airbox.  I found it under the airbox, and it looked kind of beat up.
I replaced it, and the truck idled normaly for 2 days.  But then it
began doing the high idle to 1500 rpms for 65 seconds, then normal for
the rest of the day.  It seemed to be running better, though.

Yesterday, after a 2 hour workout in the gym, it started normally, but
as I drove away I could feel the motor run a bit rough, and the CEL
light came on.  Using my new code reader, 332 was stored.  332-
Insufficient EGR flow detected.

Using my Haynes manual (which never seems to show the equipment on my
California truck), I checked the voltage to the EVP, and it was
4.9volts.  I then disconnected the vacuum tube on the top the the EGR,
hooked a length of vinyl tubing to it and sucked the air from it.  I
could hear the diaphram moving in the EGR.

I'm kind of stuck on what this might mean.

Thanks,
John
lugnut - 26 Aug 2007 21:19 GMT
>Hello,
>Long story short, I found that my ACTS had been left out of the
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>Thanks,
>John

That may but should not have caused an idle problem other
than a distrubance of the air flow around the MAF sensor.
The ECM does not use the ACT sensor to determine idle speed
requirement.

You are usually looking for a bad electrical connection, a
vacuum leak or a bad EVP sensor which is located on top of
the EGR valve.  The EVP sensor is what tell the ECM how far
open the EGR valve actually is.  The system has no other way
to measure EGR flow.  If you had an analog VOM, pin the
wires at the connector to find which is the one with
variable impedance.  You find one with ~5vdc (your 4.9vdc is
good).  Voltage in the circuit is controlled by the ECM at
4.75-5.0vdc.  If you remove the sensor from the valve, you
will see a plunger at the bottom.  As it moves, the
resistance and output voltage should change very smoothly
with no glitches on your VOM to cause any noticeable
nonlinear movement of the needle.  Be sure to check your
vacuum connections and lines to the cannister on the fender
and the lines around the rear of the intake manifold.

Lugnut
john - 26 Aug 2007 22:01 GMT
> On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 10:37:24 -0700, john
>
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
>
> Lugnut

Hello Lugnut.

My EGR doesn't have the EVP on top of it.  I know, every photo and
reference to the two show the EVP on top of the EGR.  I suppose mine
is different because of the California emissions setup.  What I'm
assuming is the EVP, is rectangular (about 3x2 inches and 3/4 in
thick) and has what looks like 2 vacuum lines running to two metal
tubes that are connected in two different places to the metal post the
EGR sits on.  The EGR sits on the post alone with one vacuum tube
connected.

I was wondering if I should take the EGR off, and maybe clean it, or
see if it is functioning somehow.  Of maybe someone might recognize
this specific problem.  Maybe it's the EVP?  Would this problem cause
the idle glitch?

Thanks,
John
lugnut - 27 Aug 2007 12:02 GMT
>> >Hello,
>> >Long story short, I found that my ACTS had been left out of the
[quoted text clipped - 60 lines]
>Thanks,
>John

What you are describing is a DPFE sensor.  They are commonly
responsible for this code - usually not the EGR valve
itself.  The DPFE has been a problem across the Ford line
whereever it has been used - especially those before the
2001 year models.   The first thing I would do is make sure
the lines to/from the DPFE are both open and not leaking.
They tend to collect both moisture and carbon from the
exhaust.  The DPFE sensor is easy to change and cheap.

Lugnut
john - 28 Aug 2007 03:14 GMT
> On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 14:01:14 -0700, john
>
[quoted text clipped - 75 lines]
>
> Lugnut

Have you, or anyone else, replaced a DPFE sensor?  If so, I have a
question
lugnut - 28 Aug 2007 12:20 GMT
>> >> On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 10:37:24 -0700, john
>>
[quoted text clipped - 76 lines]
>Have you, or anyone else, replaced a DPFE sensor?  If so, I have a
>question

Not on that particular engine.  I have on others.  Usually,
the only problems is getting your hands on it.  On the 5.8L,
that should be relatively easy if it is like other small
block Ford service items.  What is your question? The answer
may be generic in nature.  I'm sure someone here has an
answer.

Lugnut
john - 28 Aug 2007 16:24 GMT
> On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 19:14:19 -0700, john
>
[quoted text clipped - 89 lines]
>
> Lugnut

Do you remember if the part came with the rubber hoses?  The parts
store only had one, and it was just the metal part, no hoses.
lugnut - 28 Aug 2007 19:12 GMT
>> >> On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 14:01:14 -0700, john
>>
[quoted text clipped - 90 lines]
>Do you remember if the part came with the rubber hoses?  The parts
>store only had one, and it was just the metal part, no hoses.

Alll I have ecer seen are bare sensors.  The only time I
have seen anything other is if it is part of a recall
campaign and other parts are required.  One of more of the
tubes may have to be sourced from the dealer or fabricated
if it is not reuseable.

Lugnut
john - 29 Aug 2007 03:49 GMT
> On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 08:24:30 -0700, john
>
[quoted text clipped - 102 lines]
>
> Lugnut

OK, thanks.  The tubes/hoses on mine look permanent to me, as far as
the sensor to hose connection is concerned.   I didn't want to start
yanking on them without asking someone.  Gracias.
john - 30 Aug 2007 22:10 GMT
> On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 08:24:30 -0700, john
>
[quoted text clipped - 102 lines]
>
> Lugnut

I got the DPFE sensor on fairly easily.  The cheapest one I could find
was $40.  The CEL light still comes on sometimes, but the idle
problems seems to have gone away.  I swear it has something to do with
weather (temp/humidity).  Next, I'll take off the EGR and try to clean
it.

On cleaning to EGR, do I spray it down good with carb cleaner, like an
IACV?  Would that damage the diaphram at all?

John
lugnut - 31 Aug 2007 04:16 GMT
>> >> On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 19:14:19 -0700, john
>>
[quoted text clipped - 111 lines]
>
>John

That is probably the safest thing to do.  If the tubes are
plugged, you may have to use a piece of wire to clean them.
I would not probe too deeply into the valve itself as it has
a diaphragm in it.  An EGR that is too far open can cause
high/bad idle.  This can be a result of a bad DPFE.  The
biggest problem tubes for EGR operation are those to/from
the DPFE itself.  The Exhaust tubes to the valve are not
usually a problem unless you have an oil burner or it is
running excessive fuel for a while.

Lugnut
ds549@webtv.net - 26 Aug 2007 22:52 GMT
that little sqare box with 2 hoses going to it measures
differential feedback pressure (dpfe sensor)  flow to egr valve.  seen
any fords running bad and getting an egr flow code with dpfe sensor bad
i usually remove the hoses at the ex pipe and see if both hold a
vacume  into the dpfe .ahole in the hose or if the hoses are loose can
cause code , or a diaphram in the dpfe could be leaking.  

http://www.minibite.com/america/malone.htm
Happy Traveler - 27 Aug 2007 02:11 GMT
As the previous poster mentioned, what you have is a DPFE -- differential
pressure sensor. It measures the flow indirectly, by sensing the pressure
drop across a restriction in the EGR tube. The DPFEs of that era are prone
to failure; they get 'stuck' at some constant reading, typically at the end
of the range. It's fairly easy to test the device with a vacuum pump and a
DVM, but as they are relatively inexpensive (probably around $35 for an
aftermarket part), it may be simpler to replace rather than take the effort
to test. Make sure the tubes are intact and connected properly, and don't
switch them around...

>       that little sqare box with 2 hoses going to it measures
> differential feedback pressure (dpfe sensor)  flow to egr valve.  seen
> any fords running bad and getting an egr flow code with dpfe sensor bad
john - 27 Aug 2007 02:37 GMT
> As the previous poster mentioned, what you have is a DPFE -- differential
> pressure sensor. It measures the flow indirectly, by sensing the pressure
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> > differential feedback pressure (dpfe sensor)  flow to egr valve.  seen
> > any fords running bad and getting an egr flow code with dpfe sensor bad

Yes, thank you.  I have a DPFE.  I'm still wondering about the idle
glitch.  Do you have any insight there?
john - 27 Aug 2007 02:47 GMT
On Aug 26, 2:52 pm, ds...@webtv.net wrote:
>        that little sqare box with 2 hoses going to it measures
> differential feedback pressure (dpfe sensor)  flow to egr valve.  seen
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> http://www.minibite.com/america/malone.htm

thank you for pointing that out to me.  big help.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.