On Apr 19, 9:42 am, lorad...@cs.com wrote:
> On Apr 19, 8:14 am, "A boy named Soo" <boobo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> McLame - on the other hand - seems to be who you were talking about..
> He said that the current economic condition 'was basically sound'.
>..And that.. in spite of enormous imbalance of trade, record deficit
>budgets, and continual loss of US jobs and US industry and
>infrastructure.
>The republicons are stupid.
We aren't stupid. What he said, that the economy is basically sound,
is backed up by the stock market and many other factors, such as
low unemployment, high revenues, etc.
Loss of US industry has gone on through the last three presidents.
lorad474@cs.com - 21 Apr 2008 05:59 GMT
> <lorad...@cs.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Loss of US industry has gone on through the last three presidents.
Wrong, young Scott...
The economy is totally unsound.
Ever since the WTO and NAFTA crap was signed.. it's been on the poop
chute sliding down.
Bush 'accomplishments'
-Deficit budgets
-Three *trillion* dollar waste in Iraq
-Negative balance of trade
-Negative balance of investment
-Mortgage fiasco (still unfolding)
-Record high fuel prices
-Highest inflation rate in 37 years
-20 million illegals in the US taking US jobs
-Declining standard of living since Bush took office
The economy is totally unsound
f. barnes - 21 Apr 2008 15:56 GMT
> <lorad...@cs.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> is backed up by the stock market and many other factors, such as
> low unemployment, high revenues, etc.
The same was true just before the crash of '29.
> Loss of US industry has gone on through the last three presidents.