Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Ford / Ford Cars / June 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

new Lincoln (MKS?)

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Itsfrom Click - 20 Jun 2008 16:33 GMT
when the Ford Five Hundred and Mercury Montego came out in 2005, mags
said a Lincoln version was to follow.

3 years later, I'm now  seeing tv commercials for it..........went to
Lincoln.com and there's no mention of it.
But there are several independent sites that have details and pricing.

was interested until I noticed that the engine requires premium
gas.......good job guys.
Mike hunt - 20 Jun 2008 20:46 GMT
The 3.5 V6 does not require premium.   The last Lincoln to require premium
fuel was the Lincoln LS V8.   I have a 20005 LS and it runs fine on regular
89, in any event

> when the Ford Five Hundred and Mercury Montego came out in 2005, mags
> said a Lincoln version was to follow.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> was interested until I noticed that the engine requires premium
> gas.......good job guys.
C. E. White - 21 Jun 2008 01:56 GMT
> The 3.5 V6 does not require premium.   The last Lincoln to require premium
> fuel was the Lincoln LS V8.   I have a 20005 LS and it runs fine on
> regular 89, in any event

The MKS has a 3.7L V-6 , not the 3.5L V-6. www.fueleconomy.gov claims it
will run on regular.

Ed
Mike hunt - 21 Jun 2008 18:12 GMT
That is true, but the Lincoln he was referencing was the 2008 MKZ not the
2009 MKS, that is just coming to market.   My 2008 MKZ has the 3.5 and it
uses 87 octane as did my previous Zephyr that had the 3.0 V

>> The 3.5 V6 does not require premium.   The last Lincoln to require
>> premium fuel was the Lincoln LS V8.   I have a 20005 LS and it runs fine
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Ed
C. E. White - 23 Jun 2008 12:42 GMT
> That is true, but the Lincoln he was referencing was the 2008 MKZ
> not the 2009 MKS, that is just coming to market.   My 2008 MKZ has
> the 3.5 and it uses 87 octane as did my previous Zephyr that had the
> 3.0 V

Geez Mike...did you even read the subject line (new Lincoln (MKS?))?
No where in the original post was the MKZ mentioned at all. Just for
reference, here is the OP:

Re: new Lincoln (MKS?)

when the Ford Five Hundred and Mercury Montego came out in 2005, mags
said a Lincoln version was to follow.

3 years later, I'm now  seeing tv commercials for it..........went to
Lincoln.com and there's no mention of it.
But there are several independent sites that have details and pricing.

was interested until I noticed that the engine requires premium
gas.......good job guys.

Ed

>>> The 3.5 V6 does not require premium.   The last Lincoln to require
>>> premium fuel was the Lincoln LS V8.   I have a 20005 LS and it
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>>
>> Ed
Andrew Rossmann - 20 Jun 2008 21:51 GMT
[This followup was posted to alt.autos.ford and a copy was sent to the
cited author.]

> when the Ford Five Hundred and Mercury Montego came out in 2005, mags
> said a Lincoln version was to follow.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> was interested until I noticed that the engine requires premium
> gas.......good job guys.

The MKS uses a 3.7L version of the 3.5L from the new Taurus/Sable.

I had no problems finding the official site:
http://www.lincoln.com/reachhigher/?referrer=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Eford%
2Ecom&glbcmp=ford|vehicles
Shorter version: http://tinyurl.com/5hzbbe

As for premium, it's not as 'expensive' as it used to be. At $2.00/gal,
the typical $0.20 extra was a 10% increase. Now at $4.00/gal, it's only
a 5% increase.

--
If there is a no_junk in my address, please REMOVE it before replying!
All junk mail senders will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the
law!!
http://home.att.net/~andyross
Mike hunt - 21 Jun 2008 18:05 GMT
I owned four Lincoln LS V8s, a 2000. 2002. 2004 still have a 2205 that I
kept at my home in Key West.  I always used regular in all of them, no
problem

> [This followup was posted to alt.autos.ford and a copy was sent to the
> cited author.]
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> law!!
> http://home.att.net/~andyross
Jeff - 21 Jun 2008 18:10 GMT
> I owned four Lincoln LS V8s, a 2000. 2002. 2004 still have a 2205

Wow! I thought Ford didn't even come out with its 2009 trucks yet. And
it has a 2205 car out already. Now, that's looking to the future.

Jeff

> that I
> kept at my home in Key West.  I always used regular in all of them, no
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>> law!!
>> http://home.att.net/~andyross 
Mike hunt - 21 Jun 2008 18:47 GMT
Based on many of the things you post, apparently there is a lot you don't
know.    I have had a 2009 Ford in my driveway for two week.   LOL

> Wow! I thought Ford didn't even come out with its 2009 trucks yet. And it
> has a 2205 car out already. Now, that's looking to the future.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>> keep at my home in Key West.  I always used regular in all of them, no
>> problem
Jeff - 21 Jun 2008 19:03 GMT
> Based on many of the things you post, apparently there is a lot you don't
> know.    I have had a 2009 Ford in my driveway for two week.   LOL

A 2009 Ford truck or car?

Jeff

>> Wow! I thought Ford didn't even come out with its 2009 trucks yet. And it
>> has a 2205 car out already. Now, that's looking to the future.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>>> keep at my home in Key West.  I always used regular in all of them, no
>>> problem
Mike hunt - 21 Jun 2008 19:07 GMT
I have no ides what you are talking about.   You mentioned "2009 Ford
truck," not me    LOL

>> Based on many of the things you post, apparently there is a lot you don't
>> know.    I have had a 2009 Ford in my driveway for two week.   LOL
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>>>> I keep at my home in Key West.  I always used regular in all of them,
>>>> no problem
Jeff - 21 Jun 2008 19:10 GMT
> I have no ides what you are talking about.   You mentioned "2009 Ford
>  truck," not me    LOL

Mike, read the whole thread. I said that Ford didn't even come out with
2009 Ford trucks yet. And you responded that you had a 2009 Ford. I
asked if it were a Ford car or truck.

Get a clue man.

You don't need to be an a.shole.

Jeff

>>> Based on many of the things you post, apparently there is a lot you don't
>>> know.    I have had a 2009 Ford in my driveway for two week.   LOL
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>>>>> I keep at my home in Key West.  I always used regular in all of them,
>>>>> no problem
Rodan - 22 Jun 2008 04:44 GMT
Mike Hunt wrote:

I owned four Lincoln LS V8s, a 2000. 2002. 2004,
still have a 2205.
________________________________________

Wow!   Ford didn't even come out with its 2009
trucks yet, and it has a 2205 car out already.
_________________________________________

Ooooh!!    Ooooh!!   Ooooh!!    Caught Mike in
a mistake again!!       It's so satisfying when
one's life work is rewarded.

Now, that's looking to the future.

Jeff

> that I
> kept at my home in Key West.  I always used regular in all of them, no
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>> law!!
>> http://home.att.net/~andyross
Mike hunt - 22 Jun 2008 22:37 GMT
I need not waist my valuable time proofreading what I post, our friend Jeff
does it for me   ;)

> Mike Hunt wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 48 lines]
>>> law!!
>>> http://home.att.net/~andyross
Andrew Rossmann - 22 Jun 2008 13:18 GMT
> > I owned four Lincoln LS V8s, a 2000. 2002. 2004 still have a 2205
>
> Wow! I thought Ford didn't even come out with its 2009 trucks yet. And
> it has a 2205 car out already. Now, that's looking to the future.

On a side note, I read that due to the crash in truck sales, the 2009
F150's will be delayed at least 2 months, from late summer to the fall.

Signature

If there is a no_junk in my address, please REMOVE it before replying!
All junk mail senders will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the
law!!
http://home.att.net/~andyross

Mike hunt - 22 Jun 2008 22:44 GMT
I wonder if any of the manufacture who are currently selling vehicles in the
US, would be HAPPY to be selling a high profit one that is still selling at
the rate of 500,000 a year as annual sales fall from 16,000,000 to
14,500,000?  Wanna bet Toyota would love to selling ONLY 500,000 Tondras
;)

>> > I owned four Lincoln LS V8s, a 2000. 2002. 2004 still have a 2205
>>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> On a side note, I read that due to the crash in truck sales, the 2009
> F150's will be delayed at least 2 months, from late summer to the fall.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.