>> I rather stiupidly bought as '95 Ford Windstar 3.8 without doing my homework
>> on theis vehicle.
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>Check engine light? Low coolant? temp gauge fluctuating?
>contaminated oil?
Actually, on a 3.8 by the time you see, much less recognise the
warning signs, it can already be too late.
As little as a couple ounces of coolant inthe oil can destroy that
engine.
>With a 3.8, these were the warning signs. Then you could have
>just got a head job rather than a different motor.
And after replacing the head gaskets etc, the engine has a knock in it
and you STILL need to replace it.
Or you find the front cover gasket is leaking, in which case there is
NO sweet smelling exhaust, no steam, no check engine light, and no
fluctuating temperature.
And so little antifreeze in the oil it is easy to miss - yet enough
glycol to have damaged the bearings.
>A junkyard motor is a crap shoot any way you look at it.
>Even if they start it and it runs, there is no guarantee that
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>Or do a preemptive strike and have new gaskets put on before your
>install it.
The only route that makes sense
>You could buy a crate motor, but with installation that would cost more
>than your van is worth.
>
>Bob
Sometimes you just have to cut your losses and get out while the
getting is good------.
As Phil Edmunston so elequently put the question - "Can Ford survive
the WindStar??"
>----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
>http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
>---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
Bob Urz - 24 Oct 2004 19:59 GMT
>>>I rather stiupidly bought as '95 Ford Windstar 3.8 without doing my homework
>>>on theis vehicle.
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> And after replacing the head gaskets etc, the engine has a knock in it
> and you STILL need to replace it.
Well, if it was knocking at the point you pulled the heads it would be
a moot point. Bottom end failing. But if you caught the symptoms early
enough and had no knock, its worth a shot. Guarantees? none.
> Or you find the front cover gasket is leaking, in which case there is
> NO sweet smelling exhaust, no steam, no check engine light, and no
> fluctuating temperature.
All very possible
> And so little antifreeze in the oil it is easy to miss - yet enough
> glycol to have damaged the bearings.
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> Sometimes you just have to cut your losses and get out while the
> getting is good------.
I like windstars. Its sad that the whole 3.8 issues trashes a lot
if them. ITs too bas that there is not a antifreeze sensor that can be
put in with the oil pressure sensor to give an instant indication of
impending doom.
Bob
> As Phil Edmunston so elequently put the question - "Can Ford survive
> the WindStar??"
>
>>----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
>>http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
>>---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
nospam.clare.nce@sny.der.on.ca - 24 Oct 2004 23:55 GMT
>>>>I rather stiupidly bought as '95 Ford Windstar 3.8 without doing my homework
>>>>on theis vehicle.
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
>a moot point. Bottom end failing. But if you caught the symptoms early
>enough and had no knock, its worth a shot. Guarantees? none.
You are right - absolutely no guarantees, because the bearings can
start knocking anytime from a couple hours to a couple weeks after the
glycol contaminates them. Changing the oil, or flushing the engine
does not seem to be an effective prevention. Once the glycol has hit
the bearings there is a very high probability of engine failure - and
replacing rod bearings and mains does not fix the knock - not sure if
it takes out the wrist pin bushings as well, or cam bearings, - but
once it starts to knock anything short of a total overhaul is just
throwing good money after bad.
Apparently Ford has bearings available that are less succeptible to
glycol damage - but I wouldn't put much stock in them either.
Possibly running synthetic oil would be advantageous, along with
silicate free antifreeze. But putting it in after the fact is like
locking the barn door after the horse has escaped.
>> Or you find the front cover gasket is leaking, in which case there is
>> NO sweet smelling exhaust, no steam, no check engine light, and no
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
>http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
>---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---