Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Ford / Ford Cars / November 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Ford wins CVPI Class Action Lawsuit in Illinois

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
I am me! - 13 Nov 2004 00:43 GMT
Ford wins CVPI Class Action Lawsuit in Illinois                        
                                                                       
DEARBORN, Mich., Oct. 15, 2004 ? An Illinois jury today returned a    
verdict that the Crown Victoria Police Interceptor is a safe, reliable
police car, following findings by the National Highway Transportation  
Safety Administration (NHTSA) that the car exceeds federal standards  
for fuel system safety. "No design can eliminate all risk in 70 mph or
80 mph collisions into parked police vehicles," said Ford attorney    
Doug Lampe. "The plaintiffs' attorneys were asking for a vehicle      
that's never been designed by a car company anywhere in the world ? a  
car that is guaranteed to eliminate all risk of fuel leakage in such  
high-speed collisions. Instead, the jury used its common sense and    
found that the Police Interceptor has a proven record of safe,        
dependable service in high-risk police work. "Ford is committed to    
making a safe car even safer, but courtroom engineering is not the    
answer." Lampe said. "To improve police officer safety in traffic      
stops requires a focus on the root of the problem: drunk driving."    
There have been no accidents or injuries in the state of Illinois.    
This case was a class-action trial based on the value of after-market  
equipment sought by plaintiffs and did not have anything to do with    
personal injury. This case was about plaintiffs' lawyers representing  
Illinois officers that have had no accidents, asking for compensation  
for equipment that was not ordered, not paid for, and that does not    
add to the safety of the vehicle. Neither the bladder nor the fire    
suppression powder panel is a proven technology. To improve police    
officer safety in traffic stops requires a focus on the root of the    
problem: drunk driving. "The same plaintiffs' lawyers who brought this
lawsuit also petitioned NHTSA to open an investigation into the Police
Interceptor," Lampe pointed out. "NHTSA closed its investigation      
without ordering a recall. Having failed to convince the proper        
regulatory authorities, the plaintiffs' lawyers sought to have a      
court-sponsored vehicle designed by the lawyers, with the lawyers      
earning a percentage fee. But they failed in that effort, as well. "If
this issue comes to trial in other states, we believe there will be    
similar verdicts because the Police Interceptor remains the vehicle of
choice by the people who drive them: law enforcement officers," Lampe  
said. "In Illinois and in the handful of other states where litigation
is pending against Ford, the same departments included in class-action
lawsuits continued to purchase more Police Interceptors even after the
lawsuits are filed. Police themselves apparently don't agree with the  
allegations made by the plaintiffs' attorneys." Lampe noted that Ford  
has maintained its 85% market share in the police pursuit market for  
the last decade, despite the continued criticism of the plaintiffs'    
bar. In the accidents cited by the plaintiffs' lawyers, the officers'  
stationary vehicles were struck by intoxicated drivers going at        
extremely high rates of speed ? 70, 80 and even 100 miles per hour.    
The Police Interceptor is designed to be extremely durable and safe.  
It exceeds existing safety regulations. Further, it even exceeds the  
next-generation of fuel system standards, which are projected to be    
first applicable to the 2006 model year. The Police Interceptor has    
earned the government's 5-Star crash rating, the highest vehicle      
crashworthiness rating possible. It provides body-on-frame            
construction, rear-wheel drive and a live-rear axle ? features highly  
valued in police work. State and federal accident data show that the  
rate of fires following high-speed rear collisions involving the      
Police Interceptor is comparable to other make and model vehicles,    
including those with the same or alternative fuel tank locations,      
despite its high-risk usage as a police vehicle.
Backyard Mechanic - 13 Nov 2004 02:54 GMT
> Ford wins CVPI Class Action Lawsuit in Illinois                        
>                                                                        
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>  Safety Administration (NHTSA) that the car exceeds federal standards  
>  for fuel system safety.

{Self-serving hype omitted}

but

Yay!!!!!!!

This is the most overblown crap since the famed Pinto case where the parents
sued because they didnt get to bury their kids open-casket
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.