Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Ford / Ford Cars / February 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Crankshaft replacement

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Alpha One - 27 Jan 2005 02:04 GMT
Can I replace the crankshaft on a 3.8 94 Sable without removing the engine
from the car? Removing the oil pan in not so dificult.

Thank you
lugnut - 27 Jan 2005 02:21 GMT
>Can I replace the crankshaft on a 3.8 94 Sable without removing the engine
>from the car? Removing the oil pan in not so dificult.
>
>Thank you

I would say no but---- I am the guy who 30 years ago told a
Mexican truck driver that he could not replace a burned
crank in a 350HP Cummins Diesel in a cabover Peterbilt
without removing the engine.  They bought bearings, crank,
gaskets and a couple of rods and, worked on it in the
parking lot that night.  When I got to work the next
morning, they had it running with a recon crank.  That would
have been 60+ hours in our shop with all the right equipment
to pull it out and rebuild the engine.  I have no idea how
the two of them handled that 420 lb crank.
sleepdog@optonline.net - 27 Jan 2005 03:46 GMT
What about any front suspension components or the exhaust manifolds and
pipes?  If this can be done you might still want to have the ability to
raise and lower the engine in the car, either with a floor jack
underneath or with a hoist hooked up to it.  Not taking the engine out
will save you the hassle of dealing with unbolting the tranny and
exhaust and all the other wires, hoses, etc. that are connected to it,
but will it present other problems not worth the hassle?  You were
planning on torquing everything down and checking crank/rod bearing
clearances underneath the car?  I guess it can be done.  Most things
can when getting to work depends on it.

Both my chiltons and haynes manuals said I couldn't take the tranny out
without being attached to the engine on my 90 escort but I did.  Got it
back in, too.

Don't forget to drain the oil first. ;>

Matt
pick one - 27 Jan 2005 10:28 GMT
> Can I replace the crankshaft on a 3.8 94 Sable without removing the engine
> from the car? Removing the oil pan in not so dificult.
>
> Thank you

No you need clearance for the flex plate which is in the transmission bell
housing. The flex plate has to come off to remove the rear main seal housing.
sleepdog@optonline.net - 27 Jan 2005 18:19 GMT
Know he has to pull the tranny out first and support the engine by some
means, and not from the bottom.  Looking grim.

Matt
pick one - 27 Jan 2005 20:15 GMT
> Know he has to pull the tranny out first and support the engine by some
> means, and not from the bottom.  Looking grim.
>
> Matt

Why do that? Just pull the engine, it comes out the top. the transmission stays
where it is at. I've done it many times.
sleepdog@optonline.net - 27 Jan 2005 20:36 GMT
Because he wanted to replace the crank with the engine in the car.
Seems a.s backwards doing it that way, he should pull the engine out
and instead, as you suggested.  I was pointing out the futility of
leaving the engine in.

Matt
pick one - 27 Jan 2005 23:48 GMT
> Because he wanted to replace the crank with the engine in the car.
> Seems a.s backwards doing it that way, he should pull the engine out
> and instead, as you suggested.  I was pointing out the futility of
> leaving the engine in.
>
> Matt

There was a day when replacing the crank in chassis was do-able, those were the
days of the split rear main seal. So for a old timer, it's not so a.s backwards.
sleepdog@optonline.net - 28 Jan 2005 01:50 GMT
> > Because he wanted to replace the crank with the engine in the car.
> > Seems a.s backwards doing it that way, he should pull the engine out
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> There was a day when replacing the crank in chassis was do-able, those were the
> days of the split rear main seal. So for a old timer, it's not so a.s backwards.

Right, meant a.s backwards for his situation
Jeff - 28 Jan 2005 13:01 GMT
Perhaps you can just grind the crank in the chasis. They used to do that
years ago. In the 50s and 60s, my dad spent about half his work time doing
this.

Of course, not many people do this anymore.

Jeff
Alpha One - 29 Jan 2005 18:25 GMT
> Perhaps you can just grind the crank in the chasis. They used to do that
> years ago. In the 50s and 60s, my dad spent about half his work time doing
> this.
>
> Of course, not many people do this anymore.

If there were a tool to atach to the end of the connecting rod and then
crank the engine for several revolutions until it became round again?
Jeff - 31 Jan 2005 12:18 GMT
>> Perhaps you can just grind the crank in the chasis. They used to do that
>> years ago. In the 50s and 60s, my dad spent about half his work time
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> If there were a tool to atach to the end of the connecting rod and then
> crank the engine for several revolutions until it became round again?

Actually, the grinding wheel assembly thing was a like an electric drill and
a fine stone at the end where the drill bit would be. It was held in place
by a belt or loop that went over connecting rod journal. I am sure there was
some way of resurfacing the stone so that is was perfectly flat and would
line up with the crank properly.  I think there was something to help get
the grindings.

There was also a device that put under one of the drive wheels. It has a
motor that turned the drive wheel, which in turn caused the crank to turn
(of course, the other drive wheel had to be locked to be on the ground with
blocks on either side.

Modern trucks and cars require too much precision these days for this to be
useful. Besides, the truck motors usually go like 500,000 between rebuilds,
and there is much more to be done than just the rod journals. But, in the
old days, it was quite useful (and profitable). I think my dad hasn't done
this for 10 or 15 years.

Jeff
Alpha One - 01 Feb 2005 03:31 GMT
Anyone knows of a tool that can be attached to the crankshaft in that one
journal, with cutting blades of sorts, that you can turn as in a
rachetwrench, grinding it? It could attach to the end of the connecting rod
and then you could crank the engine a few times as necessary. Anything that
would allow me to grind the journal with the engine in the car would be
great.
Taking the oil pan out would be easy but removing the engine it's a
different story.
Thank you
Jeff - 01 Feb 2005 05:41 GMT
> Anyone knows of a tool that can be attached to the crankshaft in that one
> journal, with cutting blades of sorts, that you can turn as in a
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> different story.
> Thank you

You can't grind it in the chasis. You have to get rid of the dust and grit.
Plus, there is not nearly as much room in a V6 to get  the equipment in that
you have in a big strait 6. And, you can't turn the crank with an automatic
transmission.

You're best bet is to get a crankshaft kit with a reground crankshaft and
new bearings, so you won't have to wait for the crankshaft to be ground.

However, if this happens in your old Devco trunk, my father can come to your
rescue.

Jeff
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.