Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Ford / Ford Cars / October 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Fuel in engine oil

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Morsey - 27 Oct 2005 04:12 GMT
I recently changed the oil in my 83 Ford Mustang 5.0, and noticed a
significant amount of gasoline mixed in with it. What would be the cause
of this problem? and what effects would it have on my engine?
Sharon K.Cooke - 27 Oct 2005 04:26 GMT
> I recently changed the oil in my 83 Ford Mustang 5.0, and noticed a
> significant amount of gasoline mixed in with it. What would be the cause
> of this problem? and what effects would it have on my engine?

Sounds like a really rich fuel mix and/or incomplete combustion. The excess fuel
will act like a solvent and wash all the protective oil off the cylinder walls
and thin the oil to almost nothing, ruining the engine.
Happy Traveler - 27 Oct 2005 09:02 GMT
Not sure about this engine, but in the good old days of carburetors and
mechanically driven fuel pumps, an internal leak in the pump would let
gasoline into the sump. Used to be quite common. May be worth a look.

> > I recently changed the oil in my 83 Ford Mustang 5.0, and noticed a
> > significant amount of gasoline mixed in with it. What would be the cause
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> will act like a solvent and wash all the protective oil off the cylinder walls
> and thin the oil to almost nothing, ruining the engine.
Happy Traveler - 27 Oct 2005 09:04 GMT
Not sure about this engine, but in the good old days of carburetors and
mechanically driven fuel pumps, an internal leak in the pump would let
gasoline into the sump. Used to be quite common. Might be worth a look

> I recently changed the oil in my 83 Ford Mustang 5.0, and noticed a
> significant amount of gasoline mixed in with it. What would be the cause
> of this problem? and what effects would it have on my engine?
Backyard Mechanic - 27 Oct 2005 13:07 GMT
Or.. as I say.. the BAD OLD Days before Port EFI!

But I agree.  If the car started and ran okay... that's probably the
culprit.. actually worth just throwing a new part at, on suspicion, in my
opinion.

> Not sure about this engine, but in the good old days of carburetors and
> mechanically driven fuel pumps, an internal leak in the pump would let
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>> significant amount of gasoline mixed in with it. What would be the cause
>> of this problem? and what effects would it have on my engine?
oldkid - 29 Oct 2005 07:07 GMT
GM 2.8 V6 engines of that time on 4 barrel carbs got a terrible
reputation for bad rods and cranks(knocking)because of a flaw in the
carburator computer enrichment scheme.default was overrich.and it
thinout the oil and ruined the cranks on many a car.as soon as they
went to multiport injection the engines proved to be real winners.i
still prefer the ford 3.0 though.
Kevin Bottorff - 29 Oct 2005 15:17 GMT
> GM 2.8 V6 engines of that time on 4 barrel carbs got a terrible
> reputation for bad rods and cranks(knocking)because of a flaw in the
> carburator computer enrichment scheme.default was overrich.and it
> thinout the oil and ruined the cranks on many a car.as soon as they
> went to multiport injection the engines proved to be real winners.i
> still prefer the ford 3.0 though.

Not really, with the FI they often had the O2 sensor go out  which told
the comp to lean it, lean it, and they often punched holes in the pistons
still leaving the rep that they were a sucky motor.  KB

Signature

ThunderSnake #9  Warn once, shoot twice
460 in the pkup, 460 on the stand for another pkup
and one in the shed for a fun project to yet be decided on

Backyard Mechanic - 29 Oct 2005 17:14 GMT
>> GM 2.8 V6 engines of that time on 4 barrel carbs got a terrible
>> reputation for bad rods and cranks(knocking)because of a flaw in the
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> told the comp to lean it, lean it, and they often punched holes in the
> pistons still leaving the rep that they were a sucky motor.  KB

That's not a bad motor.. that's poor system design.
Kevin Bottorff - 31 Oct 2005 22:59 GMT
>>> GM 2.8 V6 engines of that time on 4 barrel carbs got a terrible
>>> reputation for bad rods and cranks(knocking)because of a flaw in the
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> That's not a bad motor.. that's poor system design.

I didn`t say it was a bad design, just had the rep from the problems as a
poor eng.  KB

Signature

ThunderSnake #9  Warn once, shoot twice
460 in the pkup, 460 on the stand for another pkup
and one in the shed for a fun project to yet be decided on

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.