Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Ford / Ford Cars / March 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Re: Toyota and some others got caught lying (inflating their horsepowe

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Nomen Nescio - 29 Mar 2006 02:10 GMT
Car makers, unlike aircraft makers, don't give performance specs., period.

Do a Google search for "specifications Beechcraft Bonanza" and see for
yourself.  Then do the same for a Buick.  

Car makers don't give specs we might be interested in:  Full Load
acceleration, braking, top speed, grade climbing performance, etc. at
various ambient temperatures and elevations.  Specs are embarrassing.

Keep in mind at 5000 feet on a hot day that V-8 of yours is lucky to
accelerate your fully loaded Impala  or Galaxie 500 out of its own exhaust
smoke.
Backyard Mechanic - 29 Mar 2006 04:07 GMT
We know that. We dont care.. remember, shithead, when you said the auto
industry was a century behind aicraft developmnet?

That would put it at 1906 when Orville was test flying the "B" model around
the flood plains of Dayton.  Hell, we're lucky if we dont break our arms
cranking the damn things!

Does the doctor assign writing this crap to you for mental exercise or
what?

.. AND..
"fully loaded Impala  or Galaxie 500 "
Yeah.. they'll probably vapor lock too!

Bugs said it best...  What a nincowpoop, wotta maroon!

Signature

Yeh, I'm a Krusty old Geezer, but at least I'm not a freakin MOONBAT!

El Bandito - 29 Mar 2006 05:42 GMT
It's all-around.

The aircraft industry is behind car industry, (for small planes anyways)

A small Cesna or Piper plane will have technologies that are behind cars,
but reliable. (maybe not as fuel afficient, but trusted, time-tested
technologies will be used.)

I remember one of the planes in our hanger while I was learning Avionics, it
had a small 4-banger Porsche engine driving the propeller. It was a
carburated engine, not fuel injected, and had lots of old-school tech
inside. (analog gauges for everything, etc...

I don't mind (even if I'll really get pissed) getting stuck on a road with
my car's computer dying, or one of the thousand sensor/electronic stuff. I
wouldn't even want to try that on a small plane :)

You *CAN'T* use hazards while parked on clouds :)

Even if I miss old carburated car engines, modern engines are more
fuel-efficient, pollution-free and economical than old muscle car beasts
(even if I miss the pure,brute power).

Don't get me wrong, I used to own a 4-barrel 351C modified to about 400HP
(1979 Heritage T-bird), I'm looking for a M3 bimmer right now.

I do miss the T-Bird, (but in corners, my 1995 Contour will it anytime)
Heck, my 1979 22R 5-speed Celica GT cornered around it :)

Signature

(\_ _/)
(='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your
(")_(") signature to help him gain world domination.

> We know that. We dont care.. remember, shithead, when you said the auto
> industry was a century behind aicraft developmnet?
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Bugs said it best...  What a nincowpoop, wotta maroon!
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.