> > Pretty sure 92 was an electronic unit also.
>
> You're good shep. The 1992 is also a 4T60E. However, doing the cross
> reference, I see this:
All the plugs were the same and no wires left over. I,m 99% sure that
it was a 92 4T60E. I will check this later today. The orginal trans
for the 94 had no reverse or any forward gears. I bought the 92 because
it was wrecked thought I could use the parts.
But thanks for the info,
Doug A.
Good work Steve, good possibility there, might only be software issues but
who knows?
> Even when searching www.car-parts.com, the only transmissions listed as
> compatible are 1994 and 1995 models. My opinion is that the electronics in
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>> You're good shep. The 1992 is also a 4T60E. However, doing the cross
>> reference, I see this:
Steve Mackie - 17 Sep 2005 16:09 GMT
Doing some more research. The 1992 ECM is 16141470 and the 1995 PCM is
16183247. The 1995 PCM uses the same ALDL8192 communications as my 1995
Monte Carlo 16196401, however the 16183247 uses the 27C512 EPROM while mine
uses the 27C256 EPROM.
Aside from that, the 1992 ECM uses the older ALDL160 communictions. So, in
conclusion, I agree the problem with the OP's transmission is most likely
communication issue. The newer PCM just can't control the old tranny.
16141470
Application:1991-93 3.8 V6 SFI "L" L27 (exc. "W" body)
1991-93 3.8 V6 SFI supercharged "1" L67
1992-93 truck 3.8 V6 SFI "L" L27
16183247
Application:1994-95 3.8 V6 SFI "L" L27
1995 3.8 V6 SFI "K" L36
1994-95 3.8 V6 SFI supercharged "1" L67
1994-95 truck 3.8 V6 SFI "L" L27
MEMCAL IDs:"L": BMYU, .
"1": .
"K": .
EPROM type:27C512
Steve
> Good work Steve, good possibility there, might only be software issues but
> who knows?
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> >> You're good shep. The 1992 is also a 4T60E. However, doing the cross
> >> reference, I see this:
datkin@merr.com - 19 Sep 2005 03:20 GMT
Thanks alot everybody for the info I know what I have to do.
thanks again
Doug A.