Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / GMC Cars / December 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Laid-Off GM Workers Keep Getting Paid By GM

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Rich B - 30 Nov 2005 03:46 GMT
Laid-off autoworkers keep getting paid in GM program

Tue Nov 29, 2005 8:37 AM ET

  By Jui Chakravorty

DETROIT (Reuters) - Dean Braid does not have a job, but the 49-year-old
autoworker is not unemployed either.

The Michigan native, who once helped develop the V6 engine for General
Motors Corp., was laid off after about 20 years on the job -- yet he
still collects his full salary.

"I'd much rather be working, doing what I enjoyed doing," Braid said.
"But things could be worse, I suppose."

Braid is one of thousands of U.S. autoworkers who, instead of working on
engines or installing car parts, spend their time doing crossword
puzzles, watching movies or doing community service -- and keep getting
paid by GM's jobs bank program.

The jobs bank was established in 1984, during contract talks between the
United Auto Workers Union and the Big Three -- General Motors,
Ford Motor Co. and Chrysler Corp.

The program guarantees pay and benefits to union members whose jobs were
eliminated due to technological progress or plant restructurings.

Some analysts estimate General Motors has about 5,000 employees in its
jobs bank, but the auto giant does not disclose figures. However,
according to a four-year labor contract GM signed with the UAW in 2003,
the automaker agreed to contribute up to $2.107 billion over four years.

Rival Ford Motor Co., which was also responsible for Visteon Corp.'s
union employees, agreed to contribute $944 million in its contract,
drawn up the same year.

In most cases, GM workers end up in the jobs bank after 48 weeks in
"layoff status" -- which entitles them to government unemployment
benefits and a supplemental payout from the automaker that brings the
total payment to 95 percent of their take-home pay.

The workers then move into the jobs bank, which entitles them to their
full gross pay. In some cases, workers go directly into the program and
in all cases, the workers can stay in the jobs bank until they are
eligible to retire or be placed in another job.

Braid used to work at the Buick City complex in Flint, Michigan -- once
a manufacturing complex more than a mile long, now reduced to mostly
empty parking lots. Baird lost his job in 1999 when GM ended Buick
production in Flint.

When Braid first joined the jobs bank program, he was required to spend
40 hours a week at the plant, but without work. Others like him go to
the plant and sit around, read the paper, solve puzzles or watch videos.

"People think it's awesome to get paid for something like that. But the
thing is, it steals your dignity, your feeling of self-worth. It's a
horrible thing to ask a worker to do, day after day, year after year,"
he said.

GM spokesman Stefan Weinmann said he was not aware of a mandate that
requires workers to be at the plants. "I'm pretty certain that everyone
has a choice," he said, "they can go to school, go to the plant or do
community service."

Braid now helps Doug, a 50-year-old quadriplegic, with household chores
such as mowing the lawn or patching the roof. It is part of a community
service effort organized by the union, with the support of the company.

COSTLY BANK
As GM struggles with high health-care and commodities costs, loss of
U.S. market share to foreign rivals and sputtering sales of its sport
utility vehicles due to high gasoline prices, analysts worry that new
jobs cuts will add to costs that are already too high.

GM has lost nearly $4 billion this year and its recent announcement it
would shut down 12 plants and slash 30,000 jobs could mean more
additions to its jobs bank.

Some analysts say the union and GM are in talks about the plant closings
and the fate of the affected workers, and that GM was expected to press
the UAW to eliminate the jobs bank.
"We do talk with the UAW all the time but we can't really go into
details on what...the discussions are," Weinmann said.

GM can stop operations at plants before the contract ends in September
2007, but closings are negotiated as part of new contracts. UAW workers
laid off next year will eventually be placed in the jobs bank unless the
automaker negotiates early retirement packages.

"The jobs bank is in place for the duration of the contract. No changes
have been made in light of the new cuts GM announced," a UAW spokesman
said..

"We do want to work with our unions to identify a possibility for some
buyout or retirement packages. Apart from that we'll have to work
through the issues on a local level and try and work out solutions
together," Weinmann said.

J.P. Morgan analyst Himanshu Patel estimates buyouts of union workers
would average $80,000, potentially bringing total costs to $917 million.
"Other restructuring charges could equal or exceed this buyout amount,"
Patel wrote in a research note.

The UAW represents 107,000 GM workers, nearly half of whom will be
eligible for retirement in the next three years. GM workers can retire
with full retirement benefits after a minimum 30 years of service.

GM's restructuring also sets the stage for tense contract negotiations
in 2007 with the union, which called the cuts "extremely disappointing,
unfair and unfortunate."

"I would be two years short of retirement in 2007," Braid said. "So
that's a bit worrying, if they do away with the bank and I don't get
full retirement benefits. But I have colleagues whose children would
just be graduating from high school at the time, and it's a bigger fear
for them."

© Reuters 2005. All Rights Reserved.

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
There are two classes of pedestrians in these days of reckless motor
traffic - the quick and the dead.
~ Lord Dewar 1933 ~

Climbing into a hot car is like buckling on a pistol.  It is the great
equalizer.  ~ Henry G. Felsen 1964 ~
Jane - 30 Nov 2005 09:36 GMT
Canadian autoworkers do not have a jobs bank.  We get paid gov't
unemployment insurance plus SUB from GM while laid off.  All told, about 70%
of our wages.  Not complaining, but nothing like the deal the UAW has.

Jane
No One You Know - 30 Nov 2005 10:36 GMT
After drawing out your State unemployment benefits for 26weeks and
using money from the SUB fund your MAY be eligible for the JOB bank. Do
NOT believe everything you read in the papers. You could fill volumns
with what they don't print.

The Job Bank came in 1984 as a trade off for consessions UAW gave to
GM. Ole Roger B Smith then took the windfall partially funded Saturn
Corp. Get a copy of the GM/UAW contract and read it. The truth about
all of this will be told.
Jane - 30 Nov 2005 22:28 GMT
> After drawing out your State unemployment benefits for 26weeks and
> using money from the SUB fund your MAY be eligible for the JOB bank. Do
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Corp. Get a copy of the GM/UAW contract and read it. The truth about
> all of this will be told.

Interesting.  Then it is not much different than our contract...

Jane
Beaver Cleaver - 01 Dec 2005 00:53 GMT
All jobs should be unionized, that way no one goes without a paycheck
whether you work for it or not? Unemployment could be a thing of the past.
Jane - 01 Dec 2005 01:01 GMT
> All jobs should be unionized, that way no one goes without a paycheck
> whether you work for it or not? Unemployment could be a thing of the past.

That's why we pay unemployment insurance premiums...to collect when we are
unemployed, as with any insurance.  I don't know about the US, but Canada's
fund has a huge surplus.  The SUB fund that GM pays above UI is funded by
overtime in the plants (50 cents per hour OT worked, I believe).  We don't
have a jobs bank in Canada, nor do we get anywhere near full wages when laid
off.

Jane
Spam Hater - 02 Dec 2005 08:03 GMT
> All jobs should be unionized, that way no one goes without a paycheck
> whether you work for it or not? Unemployment could be a thing of the past.

So who pays full pay for someone not working?
Dream on.

It's ideas such as this which would create an inefficient society where
no one  wants to work.
The result is the printing of excess money and run away inflation.
Jane - 02 Dec 2005 09:29 GMT
>> All jobs should be unionized, that way no one goes without a paycheck
>> whether you work for it or not? Unemployment could be a thing of the
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> no one  wants to work.
> The result is the printing of excess money and run away inflation.

Don't you think he was being tongue-in-cheek?

Jane
No One You Know - 02 Dec 2005 10:05 GMT
> > All jobs should be unionized, that way no one goes without a paycheck
> > whether you work for it or not? Unemployment could be a thing of the past.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> no one  wants to work.
> The result is the printing of excess money and run away inflation.

Many in the work force (Union & Non Union alike) draw full pay for not
working. There are a lot of lazy people in this world.

Research the history of the programs and you will see why they came
about. The UAW was looking for a means to guarantee their members a
minimium number of hours of work a year (1615 hours as I recall) and
this program does that. None of this work 6 months and then draw
unemployment for 6 months stuff. By the way, SUB does not pay a 40 hour
check, instead it pays 95%of 40 hours minus $20 then this amount is
taxed.

Why is this important anyway. The problem isn't with these programs but
with unfair trade practices and soaring fuel costs. A form of National
Health Care would help too.

Wow! National Health Care, what a dream that would be! Even the poor
could get the care they deserve. Bring the medical industry under total
Federal control and dole it out fairly and equally, bring costs back in
line. Well, I can dream can't I?

NOYK in FLA
<RJ> - 02 Dec 2005 15:45 GMT
>> > All jobs should be unionized, that way no one goes without a paycheck
>> > whether you work for it or not? Unemployment could be a thing of the past.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>Many in the work force (Union & Non Union alike) draw full pay for not
>working. There are a lot of lazy people in this world.

 They are called.... "Government Employees"

>NOYK in FLA

<rj>
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.