> The plants and value of assets are wildly over rated
> Gm is going downhill and fast
At the moment, yes they are. Bleeding cash at one hell of a clip!
> GM is just the best example of the problems the Big3 all face
> - an inability to understand what people want,
Definately agree. And they completely ignore customers willing to take the
time to tell them what they want and what they think are some of the
anti-customer issues.
> an inability to make a completely reliable car line,
I somewhat disagree with this one. Most of the lines are actually fairly
reliable these days. he average person won't have a significant problem
with their GM vehicle (although my last one was not very good, I don't think
it was typical)
> an apparent inability to look beyond immediate profits.
What profits?
> I think the internet has hurt the Big3, because they can
> no longer depend on someone walking on the lot and being able
> to convince him to buy that day.
Agree.
> Rather, consumers these days research,
> try things out, and aren't so vulnerable to the hard sell these days.
> And the Big3 just don't make a good enough product any more. Too bad.
Plus they lurk in newsgroups and blogs to glean customer experiences. Best
to keep the customer as happy as possible since "word-of-mouth" means more
now than ever!
Majestyk - 11 Dec 2005 09:15 GMT
> Lack of expensive tools and shop equipment is the only reason in m
opinion why GM has no market penetratio
> Its not because Kias don't need special tools for service - they do
but they don't need special tools because they never need service
There's a contradiction here somewhere. So are tools the problem o
not
gosinn@gmail.com - 11 Dec 2005 09:58 GMT
It is interesting that the big companies are very often similar to some
communist countries
Now in the news:
"North Korea's leader Kim Jong-il has forbidden internal talk about his
naming a successor to the world's only communist dynasty,"
This could as well have been the chairman of GM or IBM talking to his
managers