...are starting to show up in the car books and the reviews are favorable to
very favorable, although in a (Motor Trend, I think) comparison with a Ford
Expedition the Tahoe was better overall, but not in all ways. Gas mileage is
somewhat better than the old Tahoe/Yukon from the real world figures given
(14 mpg average).
The amazing thing was that the new Tahoe weighs 500 lb. more than the old.
We are at 5500 lb. now.
Pause.
GM needs these things to succeed. Gas has recently spiked to $3 a gallon. It
will again. SUV sales are down as a result. What possessed them, GM, to add
500 lb. to the weight of an already porky vehicle in a big redesign. Where
is the affordable diesel option? Where is the hybrid option? Where is the
weight loss that was called for?
Is anybody at GM corporate management actually awake? No one? At all?
Roy - 07 Jan 2006 22:30 GMT
> ...are starting to show up in the car books and the reviews are favorable
> to very favorable, although in a (Motor Trend, I think) comparison with a
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> The amazing thing was that the new Tahoe weighs 500 lb. more than the old.
> We are at 5500 lb. now.
We went from a 04Tahoe to a 05Envoy. The Envoy is a all around better truck
imo.
Roy
Scott - 08 Jan 2006 01:28 GMT
> ...are starting to show up in the car books and the reviews are favorable
> to very favorable, although in a (Motor Trend, I think) comparison with a
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Is anybody at GM corporate management actually awake? No one? At all?
The vehicle was undoubtedly redesigned BEFORE gas went to $3.
You assume that a vehicle which recently hit showroom floors was
designed last year. No way.
Adam Leinss - 08 Jan 2006 01:44 GMT
> Is anybody at GM corporate management actually awake? No one? At
> all?
Forget the weight...they look like a minivan from the back! Ewwww!
Adam