Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / GMC Cars / February 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

dim view

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
gosinn@gmail.com - 30 Jan 2006 18:02 GMT
President Bush told the Wall Street Journal yesterday that he would
take a dim view of bailing out financially struggling U.S. automakers
General Motors

Speculation has been raised about the possibility of a Chapter 11
bankruptcy for General Motors, and that speculation will likely
increase following this morning's announcement by GM of a $4.8 billion
fourth-quarter loss and $8.6 billion loss for all of 2005

President Bush also cautioned GM and Ford not to dump their pension
obligations on the federal government, as some airlines have

The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. is already reeling from the airline
bankruptcies, and another large corporate bankruptcy and offloading of
pension obligations would likely require a federal bailout of the PBGC

Secretly, most Republicans would not be unhappy to see the demise of
Ford, General Motors and the U.S. auto parts industry -- and along with
them, the UAW and its ability to support Democratic candidates and
policies.

It's not that the White House and Congress don't have a policy on
competitiveness: it's just that it's not about the competitiveness of
the U.S. economy; it's about the competitiveness of the Republican party
NickySantoro - 31 Jan 2006 18:36 GMT
>It's not that the White House and Congress don't have a policy on
>competitiveness: it's just that it's not about the competitiveness of
>the U.S. economy; it's about the competitiveness of the Republican party

That's pretty much hookie dookie. The real truth is that everyone
knows that GM and Ford cannot survive long term without major
restructuring and a Fed bailout would merely delay the inevitable.
Worse yet, it would create yet another permanent entitlement program.
Paradox - 01 Feb 2006 01:19 GMT
> >It's not that the White House and Congress don't have a policy on
> >competitiveness: it's just that it's not about the competitiveness of
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> restructuring and a Fed bailout would merely delay the inevitable.
> Worse yet, it would create yet another permanent entitlement program.

All those years of not being aggressive with the japanese and telling them
to screw off when they wanted to build plants here (like they do with us) is
catching up...
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.