Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / GMC Cars / February 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Central Port Injection (4.3 L Vortec) lesson learned

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Conan Ford - 15 Feb 2006 03:40 GMT
I am posting this here for mechanical novices or people like myself with
just enough knowledge to be dangerous.  Here is a hard learned lesson in
not checking/fixing the obvious first.  For the most part, no trouble
codes were available to diagnose the problem.

Around June 2005, I noticed my '93 Jimmy was running a little rougher.  I
figured, okay, time for new plugs, or wires, or something.  I read a bit
on the internet and heard about the Central Port Injector "spider"
problems, but I really didn't want to believe it was anything so
expensive.

So, I changed my plugs, and wires, and distributor cap and rotor.  They
were a little old.  After that it seemed that it ran smoother.  It could
have been an example of the placebo effect.  Things continued on this way
for months, it was a little rough at idle, but it seemed to work fine
once you got going.  Somedays, there would be no trouble at all.

Around November, I got my first and only trouble code, EGR valve.  I took
it to a local garage, and was informed that the EGR valve was all
carboned up and seized.  First expensive repair, about $500 (part+labor).  
Things seemed to run better after that, and this time, it was probably
for real.

Finally about 3 weeks ago, it got noticably rougher at idle.  Things were
fine when cold, but when warmed up, it would have a lot of trouble.  Hot
starting was quite difficult.  It threatened to stall when stopping.  
This was all probably due to fuel leaking into the injector manifold bowl
and getting evaporated into the engine.  A "carburator" in a fuel
injected engine. I of course balked at the possibility that it was the
CPI unit.  I also noticed about 2 months ago that the oil pressure would
go down a little more when stopped.  Not below "safe" levels, but
still... This was probably from uncombusted gasoline getting into the
crankcase via blowby, and thinning the oil.  So, I changed the oil again
(about a month ahead of my normal 3 months schedule), and changed all the
plugs, figuring that perhaps the "champion" plugs were lower quality.  I
put "genuine" AC Delco plugs in.  Of course, the problem did not go away.  
I also thought that perhaps an accessory was causing the engine to slow
down at idle, so I took the belt off and checked everything.  The
alternator seemed to have some resistance, so I changed it.  Perhaps
unnecessary, perhaps just good preventative maintenance.

The rough idles/near stalling got worse, and I started reading up again.  
I completely forgot about the CPI spider issues until this last weekend.  
By this time, of course, no auto parts place could get parts in before
Monday, when I would have to go back to work all week.

On Monday, it was basically undrivable once warmed up.  So I finally had
to get it fixed, and by now I was finally convinced the CPI spider was
bad.  Weather and work conditions would not permit me to do it myself, so
I shopped around for a garage to do it.  The cheapest place I found that
didn't answer, "WTF is a CPI?" was actually a local GM Dealership.  The
total damage came out to about $1000 (Canadian) before tax.  Pretty
expensive, but better than the garage that wanted $1300 (including $45
for the air plenum gasket).  Things seem perfectly fine now.  The old
unit looked in real rough shape, the manifold was washed completely
"clean" on the right side where the regulator is, and a bit on the left
side too.  Of course all the residue and varnish that was in that side
had probably gone into the cylinders.  

Of course, there could be lingering problems.  Thinner oil resulting from
gasoline getting in there probably did some good wear to the moving
parts.  The right hand side was running rich, and the left lean, and I
doubt that this makes for a well balanced running engine.  I changed the
oil immediately after the repair, and will probably change it in a month
again before going back to normal intervals.  Perhaps the oxygen sensor
and the catalytic convertor took some extra wear they shouldn't have and
will cause problems down the road.  The EGR valve would probably have
been fine without the extra gas going through.

So the lesson here, is check the obvious thing first.  And if you have a
Vortec with CPI (VIN Code W, between 1992-1995) that takes a turn for the
worse, it's probably the CPI unit.  If there's no codes, well, it
probably isn't a sensor (went down this path for a while too).  Also, if
your oil level goes up, even slightly, you probably have  a CPI problem.  
You'll just pay out more if you try to look for other problems first.  If
I had replaced the CPI pod in the summer, I could have done it myself in
excellent weather, and probably saved about $400 in labor.
Mike Levy - 15 Feb 2006 04:07 GMT
Did they replace the "nut kit" as well?  This kit includes the inlet
and return line from the back of the intake to the injector.

>I am posting this here for mechanical novices or people like myself with
>just enough knowledge to be dangerous.  Here is a hard learned lesson in
[quoted text clipped - 73 lines]
>I had replaced the CPI pod in the summer, I could have done it myself in
>excellent weather, and probably saved about $400 in labor.
Conan Ford - 15 Feb 2006 05:11 GMT
> Did they replace the "nut kit" as well?  This kit includes the inlet
> and return line from the back of the intake to the injector.

Yes.
Mike Levy - 15 Feb 2006 22:42 GMT
>> Did they replace the "nut kit" as well?  This kit includes the inlet
>> and return line from the back of the intake to the injector.
>
>Yes.

Cool, that engine should go another 100K miles...
Mike Levy - 15 Feb 2006 22:48 GMT
>> Did they replace the "nut kit" as well?  This kit includes the inlet
>> and return line from the back of the intake to the injector.
>
>Yes.

Oops, another reply.  You might have saved more than $400 in labor.  I
bought the parts needed for about $400 US, maybe $350.  Took me about
8 hours but I took my time since it was close to or over 90° outside
and I was working in the sun.

The EGR is a separate problem.  Mine threw a code 32, the pintle was
stuck open.  Had a dealer replace the valve and Eprom (updated to keep
the valve open longer on decel to blow the carbon out) for free under
a now-expired service bulletin.  The bulletin is likely still valid,
but the free repair isn't, it was a limited extension on the warranty
to cover only that part for an extra few years/miles.
Mike Marlow - 15 Feb 2006 15:24 GMT
> I am posting this here for mechanical novices or people like myself with
> just enough knowledge to be dangerous.  Here is a hard learned lesson in
> not checking/fixing the obvious first.  For the most part, no trouble
> codes were available to diagnose the problem.

First off - you really don't have a hard earned lesson here.  You have a
1993 vehicle that has served very well for years and has experienced some
wear over time.  That's the nature of things.  You include a lot of
unfounded speculation in your comments below, but nothing to substantiate
that speculation.  Parts wear out - that's the nature of things.  You can
replace them before they do, as they do or after they do, but to suggest a
hard earned lesson just because parts wore out is being a little difficult
on yourself.

> Around June 2005, I noticed my '93 Jimmy was running a little rougher.  I
> figured, okay, time for new plugs, or wires, or something.  I read a bit
> on the internet and heard about the Central Port Injector "spider"
> problems, but I really didn't want to believe it was anything so
> expensive.

That's a perfectly reasonable initial approach.

> Around November, I got my first and only trouble code, EGR valve.  I took
> it to a local garage, and was informed that the EGR valve was all
> carboned up and seized.  First expensive repair, about $500 (part+labor).
> Things seemed to run better after that, and this time, it was probably
> for real.

Unbelievable - $500 for an EGR?????  Something is dreadfully wrong here.

> Finally about 3 weeks ago, it got noticably rougher at idle.  Things were
> fine when cold, but when warmed up, it would have a lot of trouble.  Hot
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> alternator seemed to have some resistance, so I changed it.  Perhaps
> unnecessary, perhaps just good preventative maintenance.

Your speculation could be accurate, but it could just as well be the nature
of a 1993 engine showing signs of age and wear.  All engines drop oil
pressure at an idle - it's the nature of oil pumps.  Aging engines or
weather conditions may show this to somewhat more of a degree.  Want to be
sure?  Spend $20 and get an oil sample analyzed.  Gas in the oil is pretty
obvious though.  You will smell it, the oil will thin.  Even at that - gas
in the oil, limited to a certain amount, is not necessarily catastrophic to
an engine, so premature worry is not  necessarily in order.

> The rough idles/near stalling got worse, and I started reading up again.
> I completely forgot about the CPI spider issues until this last weekend.
> By this time, of course, no auto parts place could get parts in before
> Monday, when I would have to go back to work all week.

That's the law.  Think that's bad, try plumbing.  The Biblical Law governing
plumbing is that not only will the hardware store be closed, but you'll be
required three more trips to it.

> On Monday, it was basically undrivable once warmed up.  So I finally had
> to get it fixed, and by now I was finally convinced the CPI spider was
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> side too.  Of course all the residue and varnish that was in that side
> had probably gone into the cylinders.

So what?  No big deal.

> Of course, there could be lingering problems.  Thinner oil resulting from
> gasoline getting in there probably did some good wear to the moving
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> will cause problems down the road.  The EGR valve would probably have
> been fine without the extra gas going through.

EGR's clog.  Read up on what they do in life.  You're speculating too much.

> So the lesson here, is check the obvious thing first.  And if you have a
> Vortec with CPI (VIN Code W, between 1992-1995) that takes a turn for the
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> I had replaced the CPI pod in the summer, I could have done it myself in
> excellent weather, and probably saved about $400 in labor.

True, but again... you  went down a perfectly acceptable path absent better
information.  It's always best to examine and attempt the appropriate lower
cost, equally likely approaches first.  You didn't hurt yourself by taking
the path you did.  The parts you replaced needed replacing anyway -
including those junk Champion plugs.

Signature

-Mike-
mmarlowREMOVE@alltel.net

Adam - 15 Feb 2006 21:40 GMT
hell the 99 jimmy that we owned, we had problems with the CPI unit also, and
before it hit 95k one of the injectors went out.

>> I am posting this here for mechanical novices or people like myself with
>> just enough knowledge to be dangerous.  Here is a hard learned lesson in
[quoted text clipped - 109 lines]
> the path you did.  The parts you replaced needed replacing anyway -
> including those junk Champion plugs.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.