Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / GMC Cars / July 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Buick Rendezvous

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
williammaw@aol.com - 04 Jun 2006 03:01 GMT
I am looking into purchasing a Buick Rendezvous and would appreciate
your input on the following:

- The recommended trim level - Ultra, CXL Plus, CXL etc.;
- The reliability, especially with the basic operability, but less with
the optional accessories;
- Is the AWD version recommended; and
- The mileage that is low enough to be in relatively good condition,
yet high enough where the issues have already been experienced and
addressed.

I would appreciate your comments on other issues that I may have
missed.

Thank you in advance ...
Edwin Pawlowski - 04 Jun 2006 03:09 GMT
<williammaw@aol.com> wrote in message

> - The recommended trim level - Ultra, CXL Plus, CXL etc.;

Higher trim levels mean:
More trade in value
More toys to play with (comfort convenience factors)
More profit for GM
Slight increase in reliability issues for the fancier gadgets.

I'd rather have the highest trim level of a mid priced car than the base
trim level of a higher priced car.

> - Is the AWD version recommended;

Where do you live, where do you drive, do you ever go off road, back road,
winter sports?  If I lived on top of a big hill in New Hamspshire, I'd get
it. If I cruised around town in the south, I'd probably not.
HLS@nospam.nix - 04 Jun 2006 16:51 GMT
> Higher trim levels mean:
> More trade in value

Not necessarily, Ed.  The trade in value is influenced heavily by the brand
and client interest.  Some brands and models hold their values well.  I
really
don't think a Buick Rendezvous is in this category.

> More toys to play with (comfort convenience factors)

Just what we need.  More GM BS to go wrong.

> More profit for GM

>>>>>>>>>>>NOW, that is the most unequivocal answer of all.

> Slight increase in reliability issues for the fancier gadgets.

I don't think so, Ed.  The more gadgets, the more eventual failures and
the more expensive they tend to be.  GM in general and Buick in particular
are known for geegaws that come back to bite you in the butt.

> I'd rather have the highest trim level of a mid priced car than the base
> trim level of a higher priced car.

GM loves you.
Edwin Pawlowski - 04 Jun 2006 20:50 GMT
<HLS@nospam.nix> wrote in message
>> Slight increase in reliability issues for the fancier gadgets.
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> GM loves you.

I'm sure they do. I have a couple of Limiteds instead of the Custom.  If you
take a Custom and add all the options that come standard on the Limited, you
definitely pay more for a little trim.  Since I tend to keep cars for a long
time, the added cost over 10 or 15 years becomes negligible.

I do like some of those gewgaws though.  Rain sensing wipers is one.
Climate control another. I can do away with many of the passenger amenities
though, but we have no choice.  99.9% of the time it is just me and maybe my
wife so I don't care about rear AC vents, armrest, etc.  I was looking at an
Avalon and it had reclining rear seats.  If there were four of us on the
daily commute or frequent vacations, it may be worth something, but not much
to me. YMMV.
HLS@nospam.nix - 05 Jun 2006 00:07 GMT
> <HLS@nospam.nix> wrote in message
> >> Slight increase in reliability issues for the fancier gadgets.
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> daily commute or frequent vacations, it may be worth something, but not much
> to me. YMMV.

I definitely have a hard on at GM right now.  They produce sh.t geegaws,
but are possibly better than most of the species.

We have a LeSabre (1998) and a Reatta (1990).

I have had it up to my a.s with GM/Buick hype and pisspoor dependability.

Will I buy another??   Maybe,.............

but certainly not a Rendezvous.

GM needs to get its act together.  Right now, it is a poor choice.
Edwin Pawlowski - 05 Jun 2006 03:13 GMT
<HLS@nospam.nix> wrote in message
> I definitely have a hard on at GM right now.  They produce sh.t geegaws,
> but are possibly better than most of the species.
a.s with GM/Buick hype and pisspoor dependability.

> Will I buy another??   Maybe,.............

Pretty much the way I feel right now.  I've had plenty of good GM cars over
the years, but my 2001 LeSabre is a disappointment.  An expensive
disappointment.  I just don't know if anything else is going to be better.

I have a list of will NOT buys too. Like anything from Chrysler Corp, Saab,
Volvo, Audi.  Under consideration will be Buick Lucerne, Nissan, Toyota.
Mike Marlow - 05 Jun 2006 10:59 GMT
> <HLS@nospam.nix> wrote in message
> > I definitely have a hard on at GM right now.  They produce sh.t geegaws,
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> I have a list of will NOT buys too. Like anything from Chrysler Corp, Saab,
> Volvo, Audi.  Under consideration will be Buick Lucerne, Nissan, Toyota.

Well, after over 35  years of owning mostly GM products, and being a
steadfast dyed in the wool GM guy, I bought a Hyundai for my wife last year.
We will see how the reliability really is on that decision, but the car is a
very nice car at this point.  It's an 04 Sonata.

Signature

-Mike-
mmarlowREMOVE@alltel.net

BruisedQuasar - 03 Jul 2006 13:02 GMT
> > <HLS@nospam.nix> wrote in message
> > > I definitely have a hard on at GM right now.  They produce sh.t geegaws,
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> We will see how the reliability really is on that decision, but the car is a
> very nice car at this point.  It's an 04 Sonata.
BruisedQuasar - 03 Jul 2006 13:38 GMT
I never buy anything that costs over a few hundred dollars without
researching the options. You can research cars online now.
Carsurvey.org & Edmunds.com are good places to begin. Of course,
getting only a hundred or so comments you will get mostly extreme
experiences and views, people who are very angry and people whose
experience is exceptionally positive.

Given that, the Buick LeSabre, anywhere you look, is mostly positive.
Not so for the Buick Rendezvous.

Buick Rendezvous: 2002 and 2003 get overwhelming negative comment from
owners. The 2003 generates a shorter list but some of the big problems
over lap. A consistency in buyer comments is no help from the dealer
and once GM sells a person a vehicle it does not care about you. Front
wheel bearings, electrical problems, fuel gauge failures, Manifold
gasket failures, fluid leaks, transmission failures come up a lot in
comments. 2004 seems to be a bad year and 2005 generates significantly
less complaints. Complaints tend to begin at 25,000 miles and again
complaints cluster around 50,000 miles. 2002 and 2004 AWD model owners
complain about excessive gas mileage for a CUV; though roomy inside,
the CUV seems to have a shorter wheel base than a Ford Taurus.

The Rendezvous does have a lot of bells and whistles, and considering
many of them are electric, that spells trouble in a CUV that is cheaper
than a less luxurious similar vehicle. It is not unusual for owners of
2002 to 2004 models to complain of having to replace two sets of wheels
bearings within 45,000 miles! Air Condition condensers tend to crack
between 20,000 & 45,000 miles. Again, there are owners who complain of
having to replace their condenser more than once. The Rendexvous 2002
to 2004 comes with the troubled GM Series II 3400 V6 engine which was
used in several GM cars, including the remarkable Buick LeSabre.

The series I 3800 V6 was dropped after 1995 or '96. That was one
reliable engine! The Series II 3400 seems to be an excellent engine
with one flaw, the composite plastic manifold. By the way, GM is not
the only auto maker to have problems with its first stab at a composite
manifold. Toyota Camry and Honda Accord 1996 to 1999 generated
considerable owner complaints that at about 45,000 miles (Consumer
Reports rates cars based on surveys of their loyal reader-followers,
who tend to be middle class salary people who buy a new car every 2 to
3 years, so CR doesn't know much about Japanese cars on the long term)
engines would self-destruct. A defect in the composite manifold would
case engine oil to gel and if not caught early enough it would cause an
engine seize of the heat caused type.

Well, the Buick Series II V6 had (or still has) a manifold problem.
Symptoms are usually the car suddenly starts using engine coolant but
the owner does not see any leaking to the ground. The coolant "use" is
internal caused by the plastic manifold gasket warping from heat. If
this is taken care of immediately, the expense is much less than if the
failure is allowed to reach the point where the gasket blows.

Get this, there is a third party solution that a handy owner can buy
and do himself for under $100. Go to Ken-co.com/manifold/default.htm to
read the details. This modification kit for the LeSabre will prevent
the major engine problem from happening. Cost is under $100 including a
new gasket, you must buy for the minifold. 1-800-263-4283

A thought for Rendezvous owners. A few mechanically inclined owners
(wife had to have a Rendezvous) solved the repeat failures problem by
using replacement parts made by companies other than those that supply
GM/Buick. Top local mechanics tell me that GM in general has been
having problems with their wheel hearings.

Some owners say Buick resolved the bearing failure problem somewhat by
putting 16 inch wheels on 2003 and later models. I am not sure about
this because 2003 owners still complain about front bearing failures.

Owners seem to have a love-hate with the Rendezvous after a year or so
of ownership. They love the looks, features, ride, etc but hate the
repairs. Several call their Rendezvous a 'money pit'. Resale is so low
that many people are tempted to buy a one to two year old model. I
would stay away from 2002 and 2003 for SURE. I notice the 2007 models
are going for considerably less than the 2002-2003 models. Today's new
Rendezvous seems to go at Buick LeSabre list price, about 24,000 to
27,000. Not a bad buy, if you are a mechanic
HLS@nospam.nix - 03 Jul 2006 20:10 GMT
> The series I 3800 V6 was dropped after 1995 or '96.

I believe we decided that 1995 may have seen some Series I's used but
that year was ostensibly when the Series II blew onto the scene.

>The Series II 3400 seems to be an excellent engine
> with one flaw, the composite plastic manifold. By the way, GM is not
> the only auto maker to have problems with its first stab at a composite
> manifold.

I haven't researched the 3.4 l engine very much, but believe that some of
them
had intake manifold gasket failure problems.  Some have complained about
fragile crankshafts, but I cannot speak to this.  The freaking twin cam 3.4
was
apparently a bitch from hell.

.

> Well, the Buick Series II V6 had (or still has) a manifold problem.

AFAIK, all Series II 3800s had this plastic, or composite as the case
may be, problem.  Some failed quickly, some not.  I suspect they all
have the tendency to fail if you keep them long enough.  The new
bit costs about US$150 from NAPA.  Installation charges vary,
dealerships sometimes charging $600-700 if they can get away with it.

> Get this, there is a third party solution that a handy owner can buy
> and do himself for under $100. Go to Ken-co.com/manifold/default.htm to
> read the details. This modification kit for the LeSabre will prevent
> the major engine problem from happening. Cost is under $100 including a
> new gasket, you must buy for the minifold. 1-800-263-4283

Is this the stainless steel tube you epoxy into place?  Have heard of this
fix,
but the parts are apparently only available to their distributors.  Might be
a
good deal, but the improved manifold is not too expensive either, especially
if you DIY:
BruisedQuasar - 03 Jul 2006 13:00 GMT
> <HLS@nospam.nix> wrote in message
> > I definitely have a hard on at GM right now.  They produce sh.t geegaws,
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> I have a list of will NOT buys too. Like anything from Chrysler Corp, Saab,
> Volvo, Audi.  Under consideration will be Buick Lucerne, Nissan, Toyota.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.