Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / GMC Cars / July 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Malibu Dash / Heater Core

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Harry Face - 27 Jul 2006 01:46 GMT
I stopped by the Chevy dealer to talk to one of the Goodwrench about
getting my uncles motorcycle up and running, anyway there is a fairly
new Malibu on the floor by his bay. The console, steering column and the
entire dashboard and everthing up to the firewall is lying all around
the car on the ground. It all has to come out to remove & replace the
heater core. 6 hours labor, and this is the third heater core that they
are installing.

Great design GM Engineers.

harryface
Jonny - 27 Jul 2006 03:11 GMT
>I stopped by the Chevy dealer to talk to one of the Goodwrench about
> getting my uncles motorcycle up and running, anyway there is a fairly
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> harryface

4 months ago, replaced a heater core in a 94' Chevy Blazer S-10 Tahoe.  Not
a pretty sight.  There wasn't much left on the firewall interior.  And, was
using the mfrs manual for reference.  Its a matter of getting away from
using KISS method and slapping all the comforts of home in the vehicle in my
opinion.

Replacement of a heater core in a less than one year old vehicle is not only
suspicious, but extremely out of the ordinary.
Signature

Jonny

Mike Marlow - 27 Jul 2006 13:08 GMT
> 4 months ago, replaced a heater core in a 94' Chevy Blazer S-10 Tahoe.  Not
> a pretty sight.  There wasn't much left on the firewall interior.  And, was
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Replacement of a heater core in a less than one year old vehicle is not only
> suspicious, but extremely out of the ordinary.

I would consider that to be inexcusable.

Signature

-Mike-
mmarlowREMOVE@alltel.net

N8N - 28 Jul 2006 13:37 GMT
> >I stopped by the Chevy dealer to talk to one of the Goodwrench about
> > getting my uncles motorcycle up and running, anyway there is a fairly
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> --
> Jonny

This is fairly typical of modern cars, however.  I can tell you from
personal experience that this is how it is on a VW as well.  I am not
sure why they like to make the newer vehicles so service-unfriendly; I
guess I am just spoiled by my older cars.  On my '55 Studebaker you can
R&R the heater core by simply removing the front seat cushion and a
little air deflector plate, there's nothing else in the way.

nate

(your friendly local retro-grouch)
Steve W. - 28 Jul 2006 23:43 GMT
>>> I stopped by the Chevy dealer to talk to one of the Goodwrench about
>>> getting my uncles motorcycle up and running, anyway there is a fairly
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>
> (your friendly local retro-grouch)

Jonny,
You should have asked here first. There is an easier way than the
factory method to replace the core in an S-10. Dash wise you only need
to remove the bolts on the right side. Loosen the left and push the dash
up a bit and pull it toward you. I have done the cores on the S series
in less than 2 hours.
Take a look at
http://www.sytyarchives.com/howto/viewarticle.php?article_name=heater_core.php&d
ir=climate_controls


http://www.syty.org/old/
http://s-series.org/component/option,com_tech_article/
for some other help.
Jonny - 29 Jul 2006 04:42 GMT
>>>> I stopped by the Chevy dealer to talk to one of the Goodwrench about
>>>> getting my uncles motorcycle up and running, anyway there is a fairly
[quoted text clipped - 47 lines]
> http://s-series.org/component/option,com_tech_article/
> for some other help.

Have done same on older vehicles, and a more recent VW at the time I
anticipated doing the job.  For more info, I got the factory manual.  Of
which just facilitated making it more complicated than it actually was.  It
took me 6 days.  First day and a half was disassembly.  The factory manual
took it down this far, I did leave the instrument cluster in place as found
removal unneeded despite the manual.  Saw other shortcuts after doing the
job.  Didn't spend more than a few hours a day to cut the frustration
factor, have secondary transportation.
Signature

Jonny

Tim - 27 Jul 2006 04:08 GMT
Years ago I replaced the heater core in my 64 Malibu. Had to remove the
right fender.

>I stopped by the Chevy dealer to talk to one of the Goodwrench about
> getting my uncles motorcycle up and running, anyway there is a fairly
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> harryface
aarcuda69062 - 27 Jul 2006 05:16 GMT
> I stopped by the Chevy dealer to talk to one of the Goodwrench about
> getting my uncles motorcycle up and running, anyway there is a fairly
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Great design GM Engineers.

Nothing unusual.

Did an evaporator on a 2000 Dodge pick up on Monday, 7 hours plus
the evacuation and recharge. $$$
C, K, S-chassis Chevy trucks, same thing. $$$
Ford Escort, Crown Vic and Taurii, same thing. $$$
Just about any minivan, same thing. $$$
On the current version of ChryCo minivans, you have to peel most
of the whole front fascia off to get to the AC drier.  $$$

Third heater core on that particular Malibu, or third failure
that they've seen on that model?
Harry Face - 27 Jul 2006 16:58 GMT
aarcuda,

Third heater core on that Malibu.
Not sure what legnth of time each one lasted.

harryface
aarcuda69062 - 28 Jul 2006 01:56 GMT
> aarcuda,
>
> Third heater core on that Malibu.
> Not sure what legnth of time each one lasted.
>
> harryface

Thanks Harry.

Pattern failure Ian?
shiden_kai - 28 Jul 2006 23:04 GMT
> Thanks Harry.
>
> Pattern failure Ian?

Not that I know of.

Ian
shiden_kai - 28 Jul 2006 00:12 GMT
> around the car on the ground. It all has to come out to remove &
> replace the heater core. 6 hours labor, and this is the third heater
> core that they are installing.
>
> Great design GM Engineers.

Echoing "aarcuda".

This has been par for the course for many
years now.  Move along, nothing new to
see here!

Ian
aarcuda69062 - 28 Jul 2006 01:27 GMT
> > around the car on the ground. It all has to come out to remove &
> > replace the heater core. 6 hours labor, and this is the third heater
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Ian

Remember the old late 70s to mid 80s 'B' bodies? You could change
a heater core in about 20 minutes.
Mike Hunter - 28 Jul 2006 01:32 GMT
That was before CAFE and the need to downsize vehicles

mike hunt

>> > around the car on the ground. It all has to come out to remove &
>> > replace the heater core. 6 hours labor, and this is the third heater
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Remember the old late 70s to mid 80s 'B' bodies? You could change
> a heater core in about 20 minutes.
aarcuda69062 - 28 Jul 2006 01:54 GMT
> > Remember the old late 70s to mid 80s 'B' bodies? You could change
> > a heater core in about 20 minutes.

> That was before CAFE and the need to downsize vehicles
>
> mike hunt

Doesn't explain full sized trucks.
shiden_kai - 28 Jul 2006 01:56 GMT
> That was before CAFE and the need to downsize vehicles

It doesn't really matter.....there is absolutely no reason
why GM "couldn't" have made the heater cores more
accessible...but they "didn't".

Ian
Rodan - 28 Jul 2006 03:07 GMT
"aarcuda69062"  wrote:

Remember the old late 70s to mid 80s 'B' bodies? You could
change a heater core in about 20 minutes.
___________________________________________________

That was before CAFE and the need to downsize vehicles
___________________________________________________

That's right.    Automakers faced with legislated requirements
to increase gas mileage changed to leaner fuel mixtures and
better combustion efficiency.    But they knew that the single
most important factor in gas mileage was vehicle weight.
They made their greatest improvements in gas mileage by
simply making vehicles smaller.

But a car with compressed length, width, and height would
have its driveshaft passing by a driver's armpit, so the front
wheel drive configuration became necessary: a transmission
and differential wrapped around a sideways-mounted engine,
jammed into the already tiny engine compartment.

Consumers didn't object to the almost impossible-to-service
arrangement because the salesmen said it was a benefit: it
would make it so much easier to drive out of a snowbank.

Rodan.
aarcuda69062 - 28 Jul 2006 06:41 GMT
> "aarcuda69062"  wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> That's right.    Automakers faced with legislated requirements
> to increase gas mileage changed to leaner fuel mixtures

Not really.  Lean mixtures lend themselves to higher NOx
production.  Lean was a 70s solution to "oh sh.t, there's a
learning curve ahead."  Lean pretty much died in 1980-81 with
closed loop fuel control.

> and better combustion efficiency.    But they knew that the single
> most important factor in gas mileage was vehicle weight.
> They made their greatest improvements in gas mileage by
> simply making vehicles smaller.

Smaller vehicles should need smaller HVAC systems.
Smaller HVAC= pop the glove box out, remove an access panel,
remove [smaller] heater core

> But a car with compressed length, width, and height would
> have its driveshaft passing by a driver's armpit, so the front
> wheel drive configuration became necessary: a transmission
> and differential wrapped around a sideways-mounted engine,
> jammed into the already tiny engine compartment.

Since there is no drive shaft/transmission tunnel, that should
increase the under dash room available for the HVAC system.

> Consumers didn't object to the almost impossible-to-service
> arrangement because the salesmen said it was a benefit: it
> would make it so much easier to drive out of a snowbank.

Doesn't explain FWD vehicle sales in Florida.
shiden_kai - 28 Jul 2006 01:59 GMT
> Remember the old late 70s to mid 80s 'B' bodies? You could change
> a heater core in about 20 minutes.

Yes, the "good old days".  I don't "do" heater cores
anymore in the shop that I work at.  It's all farmed out
to the "electrical/A/c" guys.  Every now and then I do
one or two if they are too busy, but I'm never that thrilled
about being on my back under the dash for that long.

Mind you....you can turn the radio up and kindof
"disappear" under the dash for an hour or two.

Ian
Scott Buchanan - 28 Jul 2006 09:13 GMT
Do you know what the failure was? Bet it was plastic parts. I hate plastic
radiator parts.

> I stopped by the Chevy dealer to talk to one of the Goodwrench about
> getting my uncles motorcycle up and running, anyway there is a fairly
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> harryface
William H. Bowen - 28 Jul 2006 19:56 GMT
Scott,

 I feel your pain on the plastic radiator parts. The radiator on my
old 1987 Olds 98 had the right hand tank split open like an overly
ripe watermelon (split was nearly 6" long!). Replaced that radiator
with a "real" copper radiator and zero problems afterwards.

 I'm just waiting for a repeat performance from the radaitor in my
1994 Buick Regal.

Regards,
 Bill Bowen
 Sacramento, CA

>Do you know what the failure was? Bet it was plastic parts. I hate plastic
>radiator parts.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>>
>> harryface
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.