> "aarcuda69062" wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> That's right. Automakers faced with legislated requirements
> to increase gas mileage changed to leaner fuel mixtures
Not really. Lean mixtures lend themselves to higher NOx
production. Lean was a 70s solution to "oh sh.t, there's a
learning curve ahead." Lean pretty much died in 1980-81 with
closed loop fuel control.
> and better combustion efficiency. But they knew that the single
> most important factor in gas mileage was vehicle weight.
> They made their greatest improvements in gas mileage by
> simply making vehicles smaller.
Smaller vehicles should need smaller HVAC systems.
Smaller HVAC= pop the glove box out, remove an access panel,
remove [smaller] heater core
> But a car with compressed length, width, and height would
> have its driveshaft passing by a driver's armpit, so the front
> wheel drive configuration became necessary: a transmission
> and differential wrapped around a sideways-mounted engine,
> jammed into the already tiny engine compartment.
Since there is no drive shaft/transmission tunnel, that should
increase the under dash room available for the HVAC system.
> Consumers didn't object to the almost impossible-to-service
> arrangement because the salesmen said it was a benefit: it
> would make it so much easier to drive out of a snowbank.
Doesn't explain FWD vehicle sales in Florida.