Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / GMC Cars / September 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Sunfire vs Cavalier - reliable transporation ??

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Peter - 31 Aug 2006 06:30 GMT
I'm looking to pick up a relatively inexpensive car for my daughter to use to
get to and from work and school.      Single mother of an 8 year old.  Reliability
counts as she is about 80 miles away... and I'm the one she calls for service
and maintenance.

Are there any known issues with the Sunfire or Cavalier ??   They seem
to be appropriate in terms of styling.... looking at the 2.2 engine with
4 spd xmision.

How is the reliability of these cars ???   How about the 2.2 engine.... I'm assuming
it has a timing belt which needs to be changed on a regular basis....are there any
gasket or bearing problems ??

As always...thanks for your recommendations and advice...they are well appreciated !!

Peter
Brian Bower - 31 Aug 2006 09:20 GMT
i have a 2000 cavalier i bought new not one problem.
Also there is no timming belt to replace as the 2.2l eng has a chain
which is great.
Brian - Las Vegas
Woody - 31 Aug 2006 21:05 GMT
Reliability is more based on the previous owner than on the car. You don't
state year or mileage you are looking at. Age and location have a lot to do
with reliability also. Salt areas start having rust problems after 6 or 7
years. Not the body so much as the brake, fuel, power steering lines and gas
tank. I have had about half a dozen Cavaliers with no major problems. My
current Cav is a 96 which I just had the head gasket replaced on.

> I'm looking to pick up a relatively inexpensive car for my daughter to use
> to
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> Peter
grappletech - 31 Aug 2006 23:29 GMT
If you want a small GM car for her, I'd also recommend that you check out a
1996 to 2004 Saturn S series.  The SL and SL1 have 8 valve engines.  The
SL2 has a 16V engine.  It'd be about the same price as a Cavalier.  I think
the reliability is better with a Saturn.  Saturns are smoother and more
refined than Cavaliers.  The Saturns get almost 10mpg highway more than the
Cavalier.  
Peter - 01 Sep 2006 01:26 GMT
>If you want a small GM car for her, I'd also recommend that you check out a
>1996 to 2004 Saturn S series.  The SL and SL1 have 8 valve engines.  The
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
>----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Thanks... I didn't even consider a Saturn...   Nice to know they are
reliable cars.   How easy are they to work on ??

Peter
grappletech - 01 Sep 2006 02:03 GMT
>>If you want a small GM car for her, I'd also recommend that you check
>>out a 1996 to 2004 Saturn S series.  The SL and SL1 have 8 valve
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Peter

Not any harder than any other car.  But I only did maintenence stuff to
mine because it never gave me any trouble.  Their reliability has always
been a notch above the other GM divisions because one of their founding
philosophies was to compete with Honda and Toyota.  There's a reason why
Saturn owners are so loyal and love their Saturns so much.  

http://www.6thplanetusedparts.com/

This is a great place for used parts for Saturns.  They ship coast to
coast.
James Goforth - 01 Sep 2006 16:18 GMT
I remember in automotive technology class the instructor recommended
that if you were going to work in a dealership, Saturn would be the
one...the reason, among others, being that there are a relatively few
different models, versus working in a Dodge, GM, etc, each of which have
a myriad of different model cars, trucks, etc.
 So in buying one, and having to have it repaired at the dealer, you'd
have a considerably higher likelihood of having it repaired correctly
the first time.
 Nothing wrong with a GM, though  :-))
Edwin Pawlowski - 01 Sep 2006 22:32 GMT
"James Goforth" <jamiegoforth@webtv.net> wrote in message
>  I remember in automotive technology class the instructor recommended
> that if you were going to work in a dealership, Saturn would be the
> one...the reason, among others, being that there are a relatively few
> different models, versus working in a Dodge, GM, etc, each of which have
> a myriad of different model cars, trucks, etc.

Even better would be working on an assembly line building toasters.  All you
have to do is put in your two screws and a knob as it goes buy again and
again, for the next 30 years of your working career.
James Goforth - 02 Sep 2006 06:23 GMT
Apples and oranges.
Brian Bower - 02 Sep 2006 09:47 GMT
30 yrs putting knobs and screws in a toaster - I think I would kill
myself.
Sometimes life feels like 30 yrs of putting knobs and screws on a
toaster AND YOU CANNOT TAKE IT ANYMORE !!!!!
Sorry - I lost control a bit.
Now back to work - Knob and 2 screws, Knob and 2 screws ..... Its going
to be alright...One day at a time - You can do it.
Brian - Las Vegas
James Goforth - 02 Sep 2006 15:15 GMT
Have you heard about that new concept?  It's called "getting a
different job."               People can now do this when they are
somehow dissatisfied with their current one.  
And I think it's catching on.  It might be the Next Big Thing.  Check
it out !
<RJ> - 02 Sep 2006 15:49 GMT
>30 yrs putting knobs and screws in a toaster - I think I would kill
>myself.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>to be alright...One day at a time - You can do it.
>Brian - Las Vegas

Not all that bad....

You Unionize with the UAW
Draw a salary of $65,000 a year.
Full family medical benefits,
Paid vacation and holidays.
And SENIORITY... lets not forget seniority.
Retire after 30 years, with a generous pension,
and lifetime medical....

I think you can "tough it out".......

<rj>
80 Knight - 02 Sep 2006 19:13 GMT
>>30 yrs putting knobs and screws in a toaster - I think I would kill
>>myself.
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> <rj>

Have you ever spent time working on a car assembly line? Some people can do
it quite fine, others can't. Not even for your $65,000 a year figure.
Edwin Pawlowski - 02 Sep 2006 20:39 GMT
"80 Knight" <80_knightREMOVEMEPLEASE@rogers.com> wrote in message
>> Retire after 30 years, with a generous pension,
>> and lifetime medical....
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Have you ever spent time working on a car assembly line? Some people can
> do it quite fine, others can't. Not even for your $65,000 a year figure.

Exactly why I made my comment about working on Saturns all day every day. I
hate repetitive work and grow bored very fast.  The challenge of
troubleshooting and working on different makes of car is much more
stimulating that doing plug changes on the same car every day, every week,
every year.  In addition, if you become proficient with more vehicles, the
potential to earn more is there also.
Signature

Ed
http://pages.cthome.net/edhome/

80 Knight - 02 Sep 2006 21:42 GMT
> "80 Knight" <80_knightREMOVEMEPLEASE@rogers.com> wrote in message
>>> Retire after 30 years, with a generous pension,
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> every year.  In addition, if you become proficient with more vehicles, the
> potential to earn more is there also.

Exactly. I don't think '<RJ>' gets it though.
<RJ> - 02 Sep 2006 21:49 GMT
>>>30 yrs putting knobs and screws in a toaster - I think I would kill
>>>myself.
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>Have you ever spent time working on a car assembly line? Some people can do
>it quite fine, others can't. Not even for your $65,000 a year figure.

You'd be surprised at how many people
tough it out at crappy jobs they can't stand.
Obligations, family, bills, insurance coverage
are all reasons to keep going to work.

My point was,
a crappy job at UAW wages/benefits
is better than a crappy job at McDonalds wages/benefits.

<rj>
Edwin Pawlowski - 02 Sep 2006 22:38 GMT
"<RJ>" <baranick@localnet.com> wrote in message

> My point was,
> a crappy job at UAW wages/benefits
> is better than a crappy job at McDonalds wages/benefits.
>
> <rj>

Big difference.  At GM, on the line, you just make cars every day and think
about the money you are making.  At McDonalds, you have the feeling of worth
and satisfaction that comes from knowing you are making society better by
helping to feed them a nutritious meal.  Ranks right up with a surgeon
saving lives.
<RJ> - 02 Sep 2006 23:43 GMT
>"<RJ>" <baranick@localnet.com> wrote in message
>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>helping to feed them a nutritious meal.  Ranks right up with a surgeon
>saving lives.

That, and a dime......   ( now a buck )

<rj>
80 Knight - 03 Sep 2006 02:26 GMT
>>> On Sat, 2 Sep 2006 01:47:51 -0700, FlyinBrianSR71@webtv.net (Brian
>>> Bower)
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
>
> <rj>

I understand your point. Mine, however, is that working on the line isn't as
easy as you make it seem. I live 5 minutes away from GM's Oshawa, Ontario
plant, and most of my family works there. They have seen first hand how much
a line job can eat away at you, and so have I.
Brian Bower - 03 Sep 2006 08:27 GMT
Cavalier yr 2000 4dr 2.2 L is a good car.
eventhough it has Nippondenso ignition parts and not USA parts.
Peter - 06 Sep 2006 02:38 GMT
>Cavalier yr 2000 4dr 2.2 L is a good car.
>eventhough it has Nippondenso ignition parts and not USA parts.
>
>      
>
>      
Thanks for your recommendation Brian.   I've started looking
for either the cavalier or sunfire.  With a little luck, and a close
inspection,  I'm pretty confident about picking up a reliable one.

Thanks again !!

Peter
Don TENN - 05 Sep 2006 18:23 GMT
Hey people---Lighten UP----I worked for GM--USA---I was paid $3,75 per
hr when I "started" there---YOU people are "complaining" about $16 bucks
per hour ???!!!!
Don TENN - 05 Sep 2006 18:25 GMT
Oh--I started in 1968---Was "laid--off" in 1973--OIL emabargo--WAS NEVER
"called" back till 4 yrs later--HOW do YOU think I "survived" //felt
about GM//UAW finally "calling--me" "back" ??? Sure would like to hear
from you all---
Peter - 05 Sep 2006 19:40 GMT
>Oh--I started in 1968---Was "laid--off" in 1973--OIL emabargo--WAS NEVER
>"called" back till 4 yrs later--HOW do YOU think I "survived" //felt
>about GM//UAW finally "calling--me" "back" ??? Sure would like to hear
>from you all---

So what DO you  think about the reliability of Cavalier versus Sunfire vs Saturn ???

I would like to have peace of mind while my daughter is driving around instead
of spending weekends with my shoes under the car.
Mike Marlow - 06 Sep 2006 01:12 GMT
> So what DO you  think about the reliability of Cavalier versus Sunfire vs Saturn ???
>
> I would like to have peace of mind while my daughter is driving around instead
> of spending weekends with my shoes under the car.

For what it's worth Peter, my oldest daughter owned a Sunfire for 5 years
and has now sold it to her younger daughter.  Like you, I keep all of the
cars running in the family, so reliability is important to me.  As well, the
oldest daughter is 2 1/2 hours away and the one who bought the Sunfire from
her is soon to move 4 1/2 hours away.

The Sunfire (a 2000) has proven to be very reliable.  Basically the same car
as a Cavalier.  Either one should make a good reliable car.

Signature

-Mike-
mmarlowREMOVE@alltel.net

Peter - 06 Sep 2006 02:36 GMT
>> So what DO you  think about the reliability of Cavalier versus Sunfire vs
>Saturn ???
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>The Sunfire (a 2000) has proven to be very reliable.  Basically the same car
>as a Cavalier.  Either one should make a good reliable car.

Thanks Mike....  I've looked at a few of them.  They seem to be nice
cars at a reasonable price.  And I'm glad to hear they're reliable.... it's
nice to do planned maintenance,  instead of emergency road calls.

Thanks for your advice !!!

Peter
Mike Marlow - 06 Sep 2006 10:28 GMT
> Thanks Mike....  I've looked at a few of them.  They seem to be nice
> cars at a reasonable price.  And I'm glad to hear they're reliable.... it's
> nice to do planned maintenance,  instead of emergency road calls.
>
> Thanks for your advice !!!

You bet Pete.  BTW, I should have stated that the Sunfire has ~110,000 miles
on it at this point.

Signature

-Mike-
mmarlowREMOVE@alltel.net

Peter - 06 Sep 2006 02:43 GMT
>I'm looking to pick up a relatively inexpensive car for my daughter to use to
>get to and from work and school.      Single mother of an 8 year old.  Reliability
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
>Peter

Thanks to every one who responded...including those going off on a tangent....

When it comes to repairing or maintaining vehicles,  I prefer those which are
easy to work on.....    Life already has enough difficult problems without adding
a car to the mix.

The Cavaliers and Sunfires sound good.... I like the styling and as everyone has
mentioned....they are reliable.   Also going to look at a few Saturns  thanks to the
suggestions and recommendations that were given.  

Again...thanking you all for your help, suggestions, and  recommendations !!!

Peter
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.