Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / GMC Cars / September 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Folly of Automakers

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Stu P Dasaell - 06 Sep 2006 16:51 GMT
http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0902-25.htm
Bassplayer12 - 07 Sep 2006 03:08 GMT
> http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0902-25.htm

Read the last sentence of this paragraph carefully:

"Even if Bush met with the shriveling Big Three, the session probably would
not amount to much more than extra CO{-2}. If Bush is still looking for
weapons of mass destruction, the Big Three keep producing them. Ford and GM
have bled tens of thousands of manufacturing jobs. Bush has bled 3 million
of them. Bush keeps saying he will stay the course. The Big Three never veer
off course. Bush says we're addicted to oil. The Big Three remain hooked on
gas guzzlers."

Shouldn't it read instead: "The Big Three remain hooked on the consumer's
thirst for gas guzzlers." ?
=?x-user-defined?Q?=AB?= Paul =?x-user-defined?Q?=BB?= - 07 Sep 2006 04:33 GMT
> > http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0902-25.htm
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Shouldn't it read instead: "The Big Three remain hooked on the consumer's
> thirst for gas guzzlers." ?

Yeah.  The entire article seems to be a rant by a liberal eco idiot who wants us
all to drive hybrids and tiny electic autos that max out at 55 mph.
No thanks.  My next car will have at least 300 hp.
HLS@nospam.nix - 07 Sep 2006 20:23 GMT
> > Shouldn't it read instead: "The Big Three remain hooked on the consumer's
> > thirst for gas guzzlers." ?
>
> Yeah.  The entire article seems to be a rant by a liberal eco idiot who wants us
> all to drive hybrids and tiny electic autos that max out at 55 mph.
> No thanks.  My next car will have at least 300 hp.

I just got back from Europe, where I will be working soon.  Gasoline there
is
$6.80 per gallon right now.  That takes a lot of the fun out of 300 bhp.
grappletech - 07 Sep 2006 20:49 GMT
>> Yeah.  The entire article seems to be a rant by a liberal eco idiot
>> who wants us all to drive hybrids and tiny electic autos that max out
at 55 mph.
>> No thanks.  My next car will have at least 300 hp.

If everyone drove vehicles that got 10mpg and put out 300hp, gas demand
and prices would go through the roof.  Plus many more pollutants would
be expelled into the atmosphere.  You oughtta have respect for those
among us who are willing to drive smaller cars that get 35-40mpg.  We
help keep gas prices low and the Earth cleaner, so folks like you can
afford to fill up your gas guzzler.

I'm tired of putting up with hyper-aggressive types with penile length
issues/concerns who have to rape the Earth to feel like a man.  There
are many formerly wild areas near here that used to be safe for animals,
but now the dumbasses on their ATV's are tearing it up.  If you need to
test your manhood, start learning mixed martial arts/Jiu-
Jitsu/cagefighting like I train in.

Tread lightly, folks.
Mike Marlow - 07 Sep 2006 23:16 GMT
> If everyone drove vehicles that got 10mpg and put out 300hp, gas demand
> and prices would go through the roof.  Plus many more pollutants would
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Tread lightly, folks.

Have a bad day today, did you?

Signature

-Mike-
mmarlowREMOVE@alltel.net

grappletech - 07 Sep 2006 23:31 GMT
"Mike Marlow" <mmarlow@alltel.net> wrote in news:d5cd1$45009bd5$471fbb8f
$11533@ALLTEL.NET:

>> If everyone drove vehicles that got 10mpg and put out 300hp, gas demand
>> and prices would go through the roof.  Plus many more pollutants would
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Have a bad day today, did you?

No..............:-)...............not yet....
=?x-user-defined?Q?=AB?= Paul =?x-user-defined?Q?=BB?= - 08 Sep 2006 00:49 GMT
> >> Yeah.  The entire article seems to be a rant by a liberal eco idiot
> >> who wants us all to drive hybrids and tiny electic autos that max out
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
> ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Actually I glad there are people like you that are willing to sacrifice driving
fun so that people like me can have fun driving.  Perhaps if I lived in a big city
and never left there I would have a wimpy electric car, but not here.  Highways in
Central and West Texas are a blast at 125+ mph.
grappletech - 08 Sep 2006 01:39 GMT
>> >> Yeah.  The entire article seems to be a rant by a liberal eco
>> >> idiot who wants us all to drive hybrids and tiny electic autos
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> wimpy electric car, but not here.  Highways in Central and West Texas
> are a blast at 125+ mph.

I used to live in Amarillo Texas in the Panhandle (for 14 years of my
youth).  I've seen many twisters.  Gotta love all those Dairy Queen
'Country Basket'eatin' Chevy Suburban (454 V8; not the wimpy 350ci V8)
drivers!  :-)  I still miss Texas, but if I were to move back, I'd
probably move to Austin.
Mike Hunter - 08 Sep 2006 17:15 GMT
I think you are a bit confused.  My one vehicle a 2007 has 300 HP and easily
gets 25 MPG on the highway.   One of my other vehicles, a smaller 2006, has
220 HP and gets only three MPG more on the highway.  ;)

mike

>>> Yeah.  The entire article seems to be a rant by a liberal eco idiot
>>> who wants us all to drive hybrids and tiny electic autos that max out
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> help keep gas prices low and the Earth cleaner, so folks like you can
> afford to fill up your gas guzzler.
grappletech - 08 Sep 2006 18:38 GMT
> I think you are a bit confused.  My one vehicle a 2007 has 300 HP and
> easily gets 25 MPG on the highway.   One of my other vehicles, a
> smaller 2006, has 220 HP and gets only three MPG more on the highway.
> ;)
>
> mike

Wouldn't be the first time I was ever confused!  Yeah, I guess technology
has largely negated many of the factors that caused large engines to get
bad gas mileage.  A carburetted 454 with old style ignition would probably
get 8 mpg city, 10 highway.
Just Facts - 08 Sep 2006 19:59 GMT
> I think you are a bit confused.  My one vehicle a 2007 has 300 HP and easily
> gets 25 MPG on the highway.   One of my other vehicles, a smaller 2006, has
> 220 HP and gets only three MPG more on the highway.  ;)
Highway cruising isn't where the big difference is Mike,
it's urban driving where the bigger displacement engine consumes much
more fuel. Add a heavy body that has to be continually accelerated and
it's even worse.
Peter - 07 Sep 2006 20:51 GMT
>> > Shouldn't it read instead: "The Big Three remain hooked on the
>consumer's
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>is
>$6.80 per gallon right now.  That takes a lot of the fun out of 300 bhp.

Europe has traditionally high gas prices which will probably prove to be deterimental
to the progress of the European Union.    What are they driving there ???   VW's,  Volvo's
???
Edwin Pawlowski - 08 Sep 2006 03:31 GMT
"Peter" <Peter@spamtrap.net> wrote in message

> Europe has traditionally high gas prices which will probably prove to be
> deterimental
> to the progress of the European Union.    What are they driving there ???
> VW's,  Volvo's
> ???

Depends on where in Europe.  In Italy, the most common cars are Smart, Fiat,
Toyota Yaris, saw very few Chevy Aveo, Fords and I saw only one Jeep.  All
of the trailer trucks are much smaller, probably 40 foot trailer and cab
over engine tractors.  In the cities, about 40% of the vehicles are 2
wheelers.  Vespa and Yamaha seem most prevalent.  You never saw a big 900 to
1200 cc like we have here.  Diesel is fairly common also.  Parking is at a
premium most places and it is common to have scooters and small motorcycles
lined up for an entire block; hundreds of them. In Siena,  I even saw a car
parked in the vestibule of a house.  The owner opened the front double doors
and pulled his Fiat out to the street.

In Austria, Mercedes, Volkswagen, Citroen are more common.
Some O - 08 Sep 2006 19:57 GMT
> "Peter" <Peter@spamtrap.net> wrote in message
> >
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Depends on where in Europe.  In Italy, the most common cars are Smart, Fiat,
> Toyota Yaris,
So true.
A few yrs ago on a cruise I was in Naples, Italy where the cars were so
small they were no threat to pedestrians and I'd have to be shoehorned
into them.
A few days later I was in Barcelona where the cars were much more usable
for a 6' frame, as they are in the UK.
Bassplayer12 - 07 Sep 2006 21:45 GMT
> I just got back from Europe, where I will be working soon.  Gasoline there
> is
> $6.80 per gallon right now.  That takes a lot of the fun out of 300 bhp.

Would be interesting to do a comparaison betwween the same car in North
America and Europe.
The difference in gas cunsumption and HP, among other things.
We might be surprised.
Mike Marlow - 07 Sep 2006 23:15 GMT
> I just got back from Europe, where I will be working soon.  Gasoline there
> is
> $6.80 per gallon right now.  That takes a lot of the fun out of 300 bhp.

Just out of curiosity - what do you do that will take you to Europe?  Where
will you be?

Signature

-Mike-
mmarlowREMOVE@alltel.net

Some O - 08 Sep 2006 19:24 GMT
> Shouldn't it read instead: "The Big Three remain hooked on the consumer's
> thirst for gas guzzlers." ?
Currently to the auto makers death?
Do auto makers make what most people need?
George Orwell - 08 Sep 2006 01:54 GMT
President Bush has been jetting around the country amost daily to make long
winded speeches in a lost cause attempt to prop up his misguided war
mongering.  Everytime he flies somewhere in his Air Force One SUV, he
wastes more fuel than your Hummer could burn in 200 years.

Not a very good example of fuel conservation, I would say.  Its always do
as I say, not do as I do when mouthed by fat cat politicians.  That said, I
would love to have a 60 mpg low slung mid-size diesel station wagon and
given streamlining and light weight materials, its doable with off the
shelf technology.  If such a car is ever made, I doubt GM will be the one
to do it given their Harley Earl mentality that still persists today.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.