"80 Knight" <80_knightSPMASUCKS@rogers.com - Remove SPMASUCKS To
Reply> wrote:
>>I have a 95 Pontiac and I wanted to dump the error codes on it
>> to find out why the service light was on.
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>I may be mistaken, but from what I recall, a '95 is OBDII, and you can't do
>anything with it without a scanner tool.
Mike,
If that car has the older "6X2" connector, then it is OBD1. HOWEVER,
most GM OBDI cars post 1993 do NOT have the capability of code reading
via the "Check Engine" light - you must use a scan tool to retrieve
codes (the "B" cavity in the ALDL connector is empty).
On top of that, the 94~95 cars are kinda a hybrid - OBDI
electrically (ALDL connector, etc.) but semi-OBDII as far as the data
stream (codes similar to, but not exactly the same as, OBDII codes).
My '94 Regal with a 3800 Series I is like that.
There are some '95s that ARE OBDII - the 3800 Series II and the 3.4
engines are 2 examples. The '95 3800 Series I engine is a hybrid OBDI
as is the 3100, which is the engine you have..
The added used pins in the connector are for connection to the ABS
computer and the E&C data line (radio, HVAC, etc.).
Regards,
Bill Bowen
Sacramento, CA
Mike Y - 26 Oct 2006 11:23 GMT
> Mike,
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> Bill Bowen
> Sacramento, CA
Thanks for the details. After I posted, I found one online reference that
there were some 95s that would not dump the codes, but no explanation
as to why. What was throwing me was the fact that it used the 6x2
connector. Then the fact that it only had 3 wires to it, and other than
ground and data, the 3rd wire to 'J' (I didn't realize that they skipped
'I')
isn't documented ANYWHERE.
I'd love to make up my own interface to see what I can do. But about
the only thing I can find out is that the baud rate is a 'custom' at 8192.
I haven't been able to find specs or protocols.
Mike
sdlomi2 - 26 Oct 2006 18:47 GMT
>> Mike,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>
> Mike
Mike, I feel sure 80Knight is correct. 95's had OBDII yet inside an
OBDI connector, Scanners use a special connector wire for just this one
year--at least that is the way it is on 95 Z28, Corvettes, etc with the LT1
engines. I feel like other95's were affected the same. s
Mike Y - 26 Oct 2006 20:19 GMT
> Mike, I feel sure 80Knight is correct. 95's had OBDII yet inside an
> OBDI connector, Scanners use a special connector wire for just this one
> year--at least that is the way it is on 95 Z28, Corvettes, etc with the LT1
> engines. I feel like other95's were affected the same. s
From what I've been able to dig up, 95's are a bastard year. They are
'beyond' OBDI in what they can do, sort of a pre-OBDII. They also do
not have any manual dump mode. But they are not OBDII compliant.
Almost as if they were an interim subset of OBDII used for development
with the intent of finally ending up as OBDII compliant. That may explain
why they work with OBDII tools if you have the wire converter. I'll
lay odds that the OBDII spec either includes a 'version number' that
determines the level of support, or does something similar to a 'valid
function list' that is communicated between the tool and the vehicle when
negotiations start.
Bill seemed to hit it pretty close to what I've been able to find out.
Now if I can just get some kind of spec... It's gotta be out there on the
web somewhere.
Mike
=?x-user-defined?Q?=AB?= Paul =?x-user-defined?Q?=BB?= - 27 Oct 2006 05:39 GMT
Try contacting Andy Whittaker:
http://www.andywhittaker.com/
Mike Y - 27 Oct 2006 12:06 GMT
> Try contacting Andy Whittaker:
> http://www.andywhittaker.com/
Put into my favorites! I'll do a more detailed check today...