Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / GMC Cars / January 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

2000 buick vibration

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
skidstar - 24 Dec 2006 20:35 GMT
Have 2000 buick regal 73,000 miles have front end vibration at 36 to 45
mph. Put new tie rods on front end aligned new tires-balanced. Also new
plugs. newbie any comments.
« Paul » - 24 Dec 2006 23:23 GMT
> Have 2000 buick regal 73,000 miles have front end vibration at 36 to 45
> mph. Put new tie rods on front end aligned new tires-balanced. Also new
> plugs. newbie any comments.

Its been my experience that that type of resonance  vibration is
almost always due to tire imbalance.
When you had the tires balanced, did they use bubble or spin?
Mike Marlow - 25 Dec 2006 13:06 GMT
> > Have 2000 buick regal 73,000 miles have front end vibration at 36 to 45
> > mph. Put new tie rods on front end aligned new tires-balanced. Also new
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> almost always due to tire imbalance.
> When you had the tires balanced, did they use bubble or spin?

Bubble?  Geeze Paul, you're dating yourself.  I haven't seen a bubble
balancer in years and years.  And to think, I can remember when that's all
you saw.

Signature

-Mike-
mmarlowREMOVE@alltel.net

« Paul » - 25 Dec 2006 15:48 GMT
> > > Have 2000 buick regal 73,000 miles have front end vibration at 36 to 45
> > > mph. Put new tie rods on front end aligned new tires-balanced. Also new
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> -Mike-
> mmarlowREMOVE@alltel.net

Funnnnny  :)
Yeah, your probably right.
I can remember when spin balancing was eliminated because of lawyers.
Michael Pardee - 25 Dec 2006 16:26 GMT
> I can remember when spin balancing was eliminated because of lawyers.

I missed that. What happened?
« Paul » - 25 Dec 2006 18:26 GMT
> > I can remember when spin balancing was eliminated because of lawyers.
>
> I missed that. What happened?
« Paul » - 25 Dec 2006 18:32 GMT
> > I can remember when spin balancing was eliminated because of lawyers.
>
> I missed that. What happened?

I worked as a line mech at Ford, Lincoln/Merc, & Chevy dealers as a line
mech for  years during the exploding tire episodes when spin balancing.
The dealers instituted no spin policies.  Lasted a long time.
Mike Marlow is right.  I have not been a mech for a long time.  Still in
vehicles but in fuel supply now to trucking companies.
sdlomi2 - 26 Dec 2006 22:42 GMT
>> > I can remember when spin balancing was eliminated because of lawyers.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Mike Marlow is right.  I have not been a mech for a long time.  Still in
> vehicles but in fuel supply now to trucking companies.

   Paul, my dad was in the tire business, & it seems like I can b-a-r-e-l-y
remember that period of no spin-balancing; but then I'm only 62 ;)(Couldn't
resist that!)  Seriously, I do seem to recall his talking about it, altho' I
never worked there--was grown and gone by then.  s
skidstar - 12 Jan 2007 01:16 GMT
Found the problem was a faulty constant velocity joint on drivers side new
one from napa $90 installed myself hope this helps someone else
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.