Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / GMC Cars / May 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Good GM cars last 5 years?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Denny B - 21 May 2007 17:25 GMT
What are good reliable,reasonable to maintain GM cars
over the last 5 years.
My daily driver is a 1981 Ford Fairmont that I have
used daily for the last 24 years and managed to maintain.
It is now beginning to show its age and I guess it is now
time to be preparing to replace it. Is a Lummina a reliable
vehicle?

Your input much appreciated.

Denny B
PAuL - 22 May 2007 01:51 GMT
> What are good reliable,reasonable to maintain GM cars
> over the last 5 years.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Denny B

Lumina or not does not matter.
What does matter is the engine.
Get something with the 3.8.
Stay away from the 60 degree engines (3.4, etc.).
Do a google search on engines vs. manifold leaks.
GlassVial - 22 May 2007 03:16 GMT
>Lumina or not does not matter.
>What does matter is the engine.
>Get something with the 3.8.
>Stay away from the 60 degree engines (3.4, etc.).
>Do a google search on engines vs. manifold leaks.

To each their own, but I like my Lumina's.  And the 3.8 motor isn't
bulletproof either, it too had upper intake manifold (and lower
gasket) issues just like the 3100 did.

Follow your own advice and do a google search, check the bonnie
forums.

Nevermind, I'll do it for you:

http://www.bonnevilleclub.com/forum/kb.php?mode=article&k=38

-GV
PAuL - 22 May 2007 05:44 GMT
> >Lumina or not does not matter.
> >What does matter is the engine.
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> -GV

Yes, I am quite aware of the problems with the 3.8.
However, it has never been as bad as the 60 series.
IMO, all engines with wet manifolds will eventually leak.
Some sooner than others.
The only real problem the 3.8 had was the EGR pipe.
80 Knight - 22 May 2007 06:14 GMT
>> >Lumina or not does not matter.
>> >What does matter is the engine.
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> Some sooner than others.
> The only real problem the 3.8 had was the EGR pipe.

The supercharged version of the 3800 has less problems, and an additional 40
horses...Only drawback is it has to run on 91 octane.
Nate Nagel - 22 May 2007 02:33 GMT
> What are good reliable,reasonable to maintain GM cars
> over the last 5 years.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Denny B

Keep the Fairmont.  Especially stay away from anything with a
2.8/3.1/3.4 engine, 3.8 ONLY for GM cars.  But I think you will find
that the Lumina is not as refined nor does it handle as well as a
Fairmont, almost inevitably as the Fairmont is a RWD platform.

nate

Signature

replace "roosters" with "cox" to reply.
http://members.cox.net/njnagel

Coffee Lover - 22 May 2007 04:45 GMT
>Is a Lummina a reliable
>vehicle?

If like old-people looking cars and aren't embarassed easily.
80 Knight - 22 May 2007 06:18 GMT
> What are good reliable,reasonable to maintain GM cars
> over the last 5 years.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> time to be preparing to replace it. Is a Lummina a reliable
> vehicle?

My Grandparents bought a 1997 Lumina back in '98, and they love it. I even
borrow it every now and then. My cousin also had a 1999 (or so) for a few
years. It rides better then my Bonnie SSEi, get's awesome gas mileage,
though the 3100 isn't very peppy. But, the interior is huge, as is the
trunk, and it handles pretty good for a family sedan.  If I were you, I
would definitely add Lumina to the list. Other GM cars I have owned and
liked are the Grand Prix's. They are more sporty, can be had with the 3800
(though, so can the Lumina), and if you get one totally equipped, they are
luxury. Same with the Bonneville's. I have owned 4 Bonnie's, and loved
everyone of them.
Mike Hunter - 22 May 2007 15:18 GMT
You are out of luck, GM no longer makes the Lamina  ;)

mike

> What are good reliable,reasonable to maintain GM cars
> over the last 5 years.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Denny B
Bob Bitchin - 22 May 2007 16:02 GMT
What a sad commentary to have to ask such a question, and nobody has a good
answer for you!!!!   LOL

Check out Toyota or some other quality car manufacturer.

Really.....

> You are out of luck, GM no longer makes the Lamina  ;)
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>>
>> Denny B
Mike Hunter - 22 May 2007 16:12 GMT
Talk to any of the major corporate fleet buyers, WBMA.  They keep their
vehicles in service for five years or 300K  WOF, because of federal
deprecation tax laws.  They buy mostly Ford vehicles.

mike

> What a sad commentary to have to ask such a question, and nobody has a
> good answer for you!!!!   LOL
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>>>
>>> Denny B
Bob Bitchin - 22 May 2007 18:06 GMT
I guess I missed the part of the question referring to corporate fleet
buying practices :)
My mistake, from now on I'll try to stay on topic

> Talk to any of the major corporate fleet buyers, WBMA.  They keep their
> vehicles in service for five years or 300K  WOF, because of federal
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>>>>
>>>> Denny B
GlassVial - 22 May 2007 19:06 GMT
>You are out of luck, GM no longer makes the Lamina  ;)
>
>mike

True, last model year for the Lumina was 2001, and that was rental
fleet fodder (as the "Classic" aka Malibu is now).

-GV
Denny B - 23 May 2007 14:12 GMT
>> You are out of luck, GM no longer makes the Lamina  ;)
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> -GV

It is shocking with all the new cars
on the road to read these posts.
Hard to believe that there are few
good North American cars.
The Fairmont has been and outstanding
vehicle.It is 26 years old. The body
needs yearly repairs.

Cars are much more expensive then what
I paid for my Fairmont 24 years ago ( $5,500 )
and they can't make a comparable engine with
all the brains and computers we are made to
believe designers are supposing to have today.

I'm beginning to understand why there are so many
import cars on the roads.

Denny B
Hairy - 27 May 2007 22:42 GMT
>>> You are out of luck, GM no longer makes the Lamina  ;)
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Hard to believe that there are few
> good North American cars.

The reason it's so hard to believe is because it isn't true.

~snip~

> I'm beginning to understand why there are so many
> import cars on the roads.

The majority of posters in this NG come here to denigrate GM and promote
imports. That's not to say that everything they say is untrue, but that you
aren't likely to get a true picture of the reliability or desirability of
North American models, from this group.
Better to buy what YOU like, rather than be swayed by people with an agenda.

Dave
Mike Hunter - 27 May 2007 23:36 GMT
A smart shopper will drive all those that suits his needs, get a total drive
home price for each that he likes, then buy the one that suits his budget.
Forget the brand and what others think of the ONE they bought.

mike

>>>> You are out of luck, GM no longer makes the Lamina  ;)
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
> Dave
Nate Nagel - 24 May 2007 10:40 GMT
>>You are out of luck, GM no longer makes the Lamina  ;)
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> -GV

I think the current Impala is Lumina-based, yes?  It certainly rides and
handles like it.

nate

Signature

replace "roosters" with "cox" to reply.
http://members.cox.net/njnagel

GlassVial - 24 May 2007 14:18 GMT
>I think the current Impala is Lumina-based, yes?  It certainly rides and
>handles like it.
>
>nate

Same body (W-Body) but obviously redesigned and new/different engines,
the Lumina never had the Impala's generation 3.4 motor (yes, the
Lumina had a 3.4 motor, just not in 2000+) the Impala has a wider
wheelbase, is taller, and wider.  Of course if I were to go for an
Impala, I'd be looking at the LS trim package at a minimum.

-GV
ROY BRAGG - 26 May 2007 08:03 GMT
AS the owner of a 2000 Impala LS, I fully recommend them.  They do have
known manifold problems, but mine received a recall to help fix the problem.
The car has 73000 miles and was a demo with 4000 miles when I bought it and
I'm keeping it if I buy another car.  I also have a 92 Lumina bought new,
and it has been very reliable.  Its major problem was a failed oil pump
which cost me an engine at 102000, but I still use it as a second car.
Roy
> >I think the current Impala is Lumina-based, yes?  It certainly rides and
>>handles like it.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> -GV
who - 24 May 2007 20:26 GMT
> >You are out of luck, GM no longer makes the Lamina  ;)
> >
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> -GV
Our friend has that Lumina, which I drive when she takes us to the
airport. It runs OK, but what an old feeling car compared to my '95
Chrysler LH car.  She has had many minor problems though, just a steady
stream of them.
When I looked at the car years ago I felt the slanted instruments were
silly.  Now that I drive one occasionally I've learned to hate those
instruments.
Me - 30 May 2007 04:07 GMT
We have a '95 lumina at work which we use for taking clients to out of town
medical appointments. This car is just shy of 200K miles on it, drives,
rides and handles far better than our 2000 Taurus with less than 1/2 the
miles.... drivers get into arguments when it's time for 2 to go at the same
time, over who gets the Chevy......

GM cars run badly longer than most any others will run at all  =)

>> >You are out of luck, GM no longer makes the Lamina  ;)
>> >
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> silly.  Now that I drive one occasionally I've learned to hate those
> instruments.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.