Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / GMC Cars / February 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

GM trots out 'Vette with 620 horses

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Jim Higgins - 20 Dec 2007 23:18 GMT
GM trots out 'Vette with 620 horses
http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2007/autos/0712/gallery.corvette_zr1//index.html
George Orwell - 23 Dec 2007 00:03 GMT
Passes everything on the road 'cept the gas pumps.

Il mittente di questo messaggio|The sender address of this
non corrisponde ad un utente   |message is not related to a real
reale ma all'indirizzo fittizio|person but to a fake address of an
di un sistema anonimizzatore   |anonymous system
Per maggiori informazioni      |For more info
                 https://www.mixmaster.it
GMTruckClub - 23 Dec 2007 16:02 GMT
>GM trots out 'Vette with 620 horses
>http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2007/autos/0712/gallery.corvette_zr1//index.html

This car is just sick.  I like it so much, but it's just not practical at all
to drive.  And who has open roads to drive this car wide open anyhow?

Signature

Steve
www.gmtruckclub.com

Edwin Pawlowski - 23 Dec 2007 16:14 GMT
>>GM trots out 'Vette with 620 horses
>>http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2007/autos/0712/gallery.corvette_zr1//index.html
>
> This car is just sick.  I like it so much, but it's just not practical at
> all
> to drive.  And who has open roads to drive this car wide open anyhow?

Practicality is meaningless if you  have the money and your ego needs this
sort of thing.  It is in the satisfaction of possessing it.  Same with art,
paying huge bucks for world series baseballs, $100 million dollar yachts.
There is no rational justification for them, just that people want them.
Paradox - 24 Dec 2007 23:28 GMT
We apparently do not tax the obcenely wealthy enough in this country.

> >>GM trots out 'Vette with 620 horses
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> paying huge bucks for world series baseballs, $100 million dollar yachts.
> There is no rational justification for them, just that people want them.
NapalmHeart - 25 Dec 2007 01:52 GMT
> We apparently do not tax the obcenely wealthy enough in this country.

What a ridiculous comment.  We should tax people because they are
successful enough to afford an expensive car?  Tell that to the GM
workers that make them.  Repressive taxes do not work, unless your aim
is to have a negative effect on people that work for a living.
Edwin Pawlowski - 25 Dec 2007 02:47 GMT
> We apparently do not tax the obcenely wealthy enough in this country.

Why should we?  This comment usually comes from those that are jealous or
envious.  When a rich person buys a multi-million dollar yacht, many people
benefit.  The machinist that makes the prop, the foundryman that made the
engine block casting,  the seamstress making the curtains, the machine
operator that made the wires for the controls, and so on.

Now, I'll admit that heating and cooling a 40,000 sq. ft. house is silly,
but masons, carpenters, tilemen and others helped to feed their families as
a result. Is that a bad thing?

BTW, there is a difference between rich and wealthy, but both help the
economy in different ways.
coachrose13@hotmail.com - 03 Jan 2008 06:51 GMT
> > We apparently do not tax the obcenely wealthy enough in this country.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> engine block casting,  the seamstress making the curtains, the machine
> operator that made the wires for the controls, and so on.

> You use an excellent example by pointing out the yachting industry.

One only has to go back 16-17 years for this lesson on taxing the
"obcenely wealthy in this country.'

President George Bush, Sr., under pressure from Congress to raise
taxes in order to increase reveunes, fell for the old "tax the rich"
scheme.

He decided to implement a "luxury tax" on purchases of yachts.

Wealthy people, who did not become that way by being foolish, decided
to either : not buy one, hang on to the one they already had, or
purchase one overseas.

As a result, there was massive lay-offs in the yachting industry, not
only costing thousands of people their jobs, but the government lost a
lot of tax revenues by these lost jobs.

Over-taxing the wealthy almost always causes a loss in tax revenue for
the government, not an increase.

> Now, I'll admit that heating and cooling a 40,000 sq. ft. house is silly,
> but masons, carpenters, tilemen and others helped to feed their families as
> a result. Is that a bad thing?
>
> BTW, there is a difference between rich and wealthy, but both help the
> economy in different ways.
<RJ> - 03 Jan 2008 14:55 GMT
>> > We apparently do not tax the obcenely wealthy enough in this country.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>> engine block casting,  the seamstress making the curtains, the machine
>> operator that made the wires for the controls, and so on.

>> Now, I'll admit that heating and cooling a 40,000 sq. ft. house is silly,
>> but masons, carpenters, tilemen and others helped to feed their families as
>> a result. Is that a bad thing?
>>
>> BTW, there is a difference between rich and wealthy, but both help the
>> economy in different ways.

Just remember......

There was "full employment" on the Cotton Plantation too.

<rj>
<RJ> - 03 Jan 2008 14:58 GMT
>President George Bush, Sr., under pressure from Congress to raise
>taxes in order to increase reveunes, fell for the old "tax the rich"
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>Over-taxing the wealthy almost always causes a loss in tax revenue for
>the government, not an increase.

That's because "MONEY" has no allegience, or patriotism.

( those are words they use when poor folks make the sacrifice )

<rj>
coachrose13@hotmail.com - 04 Jan 2008 05:59 GMT
> >President George Bush, Sr., under pressure from Congress to raise
> >taxes in order to increase reveunes, fell for the old "tax the rich"
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> ( those are words they use when poor folks make the sacrifice )

what sacrifice are you referring to in regards to taxes paid by the
poor?

Most "poor" people pay little, if any, federal taxes.

Thats fine. Hopefully, it helps them somewhat.

Taking more money from people in the form of increased taxes rarely
helps the ones who dont pay taxes.

The money is usually wasted by the government.

Government hand-outs has been a proven failure for what, 60-70 years?

Taxing people to the point that they cannot afford the Corvette will
only result in:

Lay-offs in Bowling Green, Ky.

A good portion of these people will then have to rely on the
government for assistance.

LESS revenues for the government due to fewer tax paying workers.

More welfare aid to people not working, which somehow always seems to
wind up in the hands of drug dealers.

Happens all the time.

> <rj>- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
HLS - 29 Feb 2008 20:15 GMT
> We apparently do not tax the obcenely wealthy enough in this country.

If gasoline really goes to $4-5 per gallon in a couple of months, that will
tax us all.  The few people who will buy such a car as this Vette will
probably
not lose as much sleep about it, however, as the people who are working
their a.ses off for $6 per hour.
Harry Face - 25 Dec 2007 15:27 GMT
GMC Truck Club wrote: and who has roads to drive this car wide open.

uh......Illinois 294 north to Wisconsin!

harryface
NapalmHeart - 27 Dec 2007 01:20 GMT
> GMC Truck Club wrote: and who has roads to drive this car wide open.
>
> uh......Illinois 294 north to Wisconsin!
>
> harryface

The USA needs a good Autobahn!

Ken
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.