>>> Today I put allot of money in my 98 GMC Jimmy. I filled the gas tank.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> single problem using the cheap stuff. I put a quarter of a million miles
> on that car and it never complained once about cheap fuel.
> >>> Today I put allot of money in my 98 GMC Jimmy. I filled the gas tank.
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> 87, but I couldn't resist filling it up with the premo, seeing how it was
> the same price.
Just an opinion, but I've started using only the "good stuff" in my 07
Malbu SS. At only a quarter a gallon more (4.25 vs 4.00 in NYC), the
difference in performance and mileage seems to justify its use. I
think in the near future, "regular" gas is going to be phased out
anyway.
Mike Marlow - 14 May 2008 16:02 GMT
Just an opinion, but I've started using only the "good stuff" in my 07
Malbu SS. At only a quarter a gallon more (4.25 vs 4.00 in NYC), the
difference in performance and mileage seems to justify its use. I
think in the near future, "regular" gas is going to be phased out
anyway.
*********************************************************
That would make an interesting observation over time. A good comparison of
genuinely documented mileage with 87 compared to premium gas would be worth
the read. I had thrown premium in my '92 and never noticed any performance
difference. I have a fairly heavy foot and like to feel the push into the
seat of a car, but I never noticed any significant difference with different
fuels. I recorded the mileage for every tank full of gas, and I never saw
any remarkable difference with different gas. I'm a believer that it really
takes documented evidence, because we are subjective creatures, and left to
our own devices, we will tend to perceive what we want to see, in any given
situation, absent documented evidence.

Signature
-Mike-
mmarlowREMOVE@alltel.net
80 Knight - 15 May 2008 01:36 GMT
On May 14, 1:38 am, "80 Knight" <nos...@nospam.com> wrote:
> "Mike Marlow" <mmarlowREM...@alltel.net> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> > was
> > the same price.
Just an opinion, but I've started using only the "good stuff" in my 07
Malbu SS. At only a quarter a gallon more (4.25 vs 4.00 in NYC), the
difference in performance and mileage seems to justify its use. I
think in the near future, "regular" gas is going to be phased out
anyway.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
I visit www.bonnevilleclub.com quite often, and the members there swear by
the 91 octane in the supercharged models. They say exactly what you did,
that you get more power and better mileage by using the 91 fuel. In
Ontario, 91 is around 11 cents a liter more expensive then 87, so I usually
use the 87.
Edwin Pawlowski - 15 May 2008 02:34 GMT
"Ted" <the_busmaster@msn.com> wrote in message
I
think in the near future, "regular" gas is going to be phased out
anyway.
**************************
You mean the gas that 90%+ car on the road use? What will replace it?
HLS - 15 May 2008 16:35 GMT
> "Ted" <the_busmaster@msn.com> wrote in message
> I
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> **************************
> You mean the gas that 90%+ car on the road use? What will replace it?
Havent you read the posts ? Water is going to be our next great fuel
expansion...;>)
Seriously, I cannot see the demise of "regular".