Got a great quote on both. Do I spend the extra $1700 for the V6? I'm test
driving both models this morning. From some of the reviews I've read, sounds
like the 4 cyl has enough power to satisfy most people??? Any comments would
be greatly appreciated.
> Got a great quote on both. Do I spend the extra $1700 for the V6? I'm test
> driving both models this morning. From some of the reviews I've read, sounds
> like the 4 cyl has enough power to satisfy most people??? Any comments would
> be greatly appreciated.
if its the V6 automatic? id go for the 4 cylinder.
RPoole2252 - 18 Sep 2004 13:05 GMT
i have a V-6 6speed and it's a world of difference than the 4 or the 6
automatic
Howard Lester - 18 Sep 2004 15:06 GMT
> i have a V-6 6speed and it's a world of difference than the 4 or the 6
> automatic
I'm sure it is, and a 12-cyl would be a world of difference again. I'm very
satisfied with my 4-cyl automatic.
lcopps - 23 Sep 2004 04:21 GMT
My 4cyl manual is fast, and can hold its own. And the Navi milage
computer has registered up to 36MPG on the highway for a tank of fuel.
Its almost as cheap to drive as my '88 Accord.
> i have a V-6 6speed and it's a world of difference than the 4 or the 6
> automatic
> Got a great quote on both. Do I spend the extra $1700 for the V6? I'm test
> driving both models this morning. From some of the reviews I've read, sounds
> like the 4 cyl has enough power to satisfy most people??? Any comments would
> be greatly appreciated.
I've got a 98 Accord LX 4 cyl that I bought new. Great car, but
NO passing power. Go for the V6.

Signature
**:::::>>:??:*?`????`*:??:<<:::::**
.??~ ?L?AzZ? W?A??L ~??.
**:::::>>:??:*?`????`*:??:<<:::::**
{???} WrOnG NuMbEr RoCoCcO, yOu .??~ ?L?AzZ? W?A??L ~??.
Armand - 18 Sep 2004 15:19 GMT
>> Got a great quote on both. Do I spend the extra $1700 for the V6? I'm test
>> driving both models this morning. From some of the reviews I've read, sounds
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>I've got a 98 Accord LX 4 cyl that I bought new. Great car, but
>NO passing power. Go for the V6.
I've got a 96'/4 EX and it's fine. Lags a little with the air on, but never really
had a problem.
My 2K Odyssey/6 is quicker but revs so low, the air doesn't cool the interior
unless you keep gunning it or get onto a super hwy.
I like the sound of a 4 when you gun it. Sounds more race-car like.
LBJGH - 19 Sep 2004 03:22 GMT
My LX-G '04 I4 auto is just fine for my agressive driving style but I'm sure
I'd have more fun with the V6... and probably more speeding tickets too. :o
JohnP - 19 Sep 2004 04:33 GMT
> My LX-G '04 I4 auto is just fine for my agressive driving style but I'm sure
> I'd have more fun with the V6... and probably more speeding tickets too.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.766 / Virus Database: 513 - Release Date: 9/17/2004
Well, after driving both cars this morning, I did decide to get the V6. I
test drove the 4 first and was impressed with the ride and power. I than
drove the 6 and didn't want to stop driving it. I got the car for $1200
below invoice thanks to a $1000 rebate. Had there not been a rebate on the
car, I would have probably settled for the 4 and still been quite content.
Matthew - 19 Sep 2004 04:43 GMT
I have 98EXV6. I wouldn't have it any other way. The new ones have 240 HP.
Smoother, faster. You don't need to drive like a lunatic...just to know it's
there when you need it (passing, getting on highways etc)
Matthew
> > My LX-G '04 I4 auto is just fine for my agressive driving style but I'm
> sure
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> below invoice thanks to a $1000 rebate. Had there not been a rebate on the
> car, I would have probably settled for the 4 and still been quite content.
Saintor - 19 Sep 2004 04:09 GMT
Come on; it has plenty of passing power. It gets to 90mph+ easily.
Rhe V6 gives much more refinement ot the car, though and fuel economy is
great for this kind of power.
> I've got a 98 Accord LX 4 cyl that I bought new. Great car, but
> NO passing power. Go for the V6.
.??~ ?L?AzZ? W?A??L ~??. - 20 Sep 2004 14:29 GMT
Save it. I love the car, but it's a slug. Period.
> Come on; it has plenty of passing power. It gets to 90mph+ easily.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> > I've got a 98 Accord LX 4 cyl that I bought new. Great car, but
> > NO passing power. Go for the V6.

Signature
**:::::>>:??:*?`????`*:??:<<:::::**
.??~ ?L?AzZ? W?A??L ~??.
**:::::>>:??:*?`????`*:??:<<:::::**
{???} WrOnG NuMbEr RoCoCcO, yOu .??~ ?L?AzZ? W?A??L ~??.
> Got a great quote on both. Do I spend the extra $1700 for the V6? I'm test
> driving both models this morning. From some of the reviews I've read, sounds
> like the 4 cyl has enough power to satisfy most people??? Any comments would
> be greatly appreciated.
The I4 has enough power for around town. It is state of the art, with
no EGR valve, has a metal timing chain, etc. But, if you are going
to do serious highway miles, particularly passing traffic on congested
two-way roads, go for the V6. It is much quicker at highway speeds,
and an extra safety margin could save your life.
JM
lcopps - 23 Sep 2004 04:23 GMT
A I4 manual can beat it off the line.
>>Got a great quote on both. Do I spend the extra $1700 for the V6? I'm test
>>driving both models this morning. From some of the reviews I've read, sounds
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> JM
Saintor - 29 Sep 2004 02:24 GMT
Don't bet on it. The V6 240Hp eats any Accord 4 cyl.
> A I4 manual can beat it off the line.
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> >
> > JM