Hi all,
i have 93 honda accord ex with about 125,000 KM on it. i checked a doc on
Honda web site and it said that 90,000 miles is point to change timing
belt. but i also checked with 2 local mechanics and was told that i should
change it around 100,000 KM.
so i am not sure which is correct. what's your opinion?
thanks,
jj
Caroline - 10 Oct 2004 12:57 GMT
Do you drive this car in the United States?
If so, the interval is 90,000 miles/6 years.
Later Accords (e.g. the 1994-1995 Accords) added that, if the car saw severe
duty (repeated short distance driving; dusty driving; severe cold driving; salty
snowy area driving; rough or muddy road driving; trailer towing driving), the
interval should be reduced to 60k miles.
See www.autozone.com 's free repair guides, then "Routine Maintenance," then
"Maintenance Schedules," where you can print out a copy of the 1993 Accord's
maintenance schedule (U.S.-driven cars).
> Hi all,
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> thanks,
> jj
John Ings - 10 Oct 2004 13:39 GMT
>Hi all,
>
>i have 93 honda accord ex with about 125,000 KM on it. i checked a doc on
>Honda web site and it said that 90,000 miles is point to change timing
>belt. but i also checked with 2 local mechanics and was told that i should
>change it around 100,000 KM.
140,000 Km on a milage basis, but also every 72 months (6 years),
whichever is less, so you're way overdue on time.
Otto - 10 Oct 2004 16:26 GMT
>>Hi all,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>140,000 Km on a milage basis,
Is that the same as 90,000 miles on a kilometer basis?
John Ings - 10 Oct 2004 16:42 GMT
>>140,000 Km on a milage basis,
>
>Is that the same as 90,000 miles on a kilometer basis?
Or 30,000 leagues on an under the sea basis...
aal - 10 Oct 2004 16:44 GMT
John Ings wrote:
>>>140,000 Km on a milage basis,
>>
>>Is that the same as 90,000 miles on a kilometer basis?
>
> Or 30,000 leagues on an under the sea basis...
I think it means .000000000000000000025 Parsecs
John Ings - 10 Oct 2004 19:17 GMT
>>>>140,000 Km on a milage basis,
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>>
>I think it means .000000000000000000025 Parsecs
On an interstellar basis?
No, 0.5 light seconds on an interplanetary basis.
Rattus the RAT - 10 Oct 2004 21:39 GMT
> >>>>140,000 Km on a milage basis,
> >>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> No, 0.5 light seconds on an interplanetary basis.
Makes me realize... My car now has over one light second of mileage!
RAT
Otto - 11 Oct 2004 00:38 GMT
>> >>>>140,000 Km on a milage basis,
>> >>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>Makes me realize... My car now has over one light second of mileage!
Yeah, mine is around half a light-second.
Speaking of weird units, my speed is around 170,000 furlongs per
fortnight on the highway, and a fill-up takes about 100,000 cubic
barleycorns.
O.
Andrew - 10 Oct 2004 14:50 GMT
> Hi all,
> i have 93 honda accord ex with about 125,000 KM on it. i checked a doc on
> Honda web site and it said that 90,000 miles is point to change timing
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> thanks,
> jj
I changed the belt on my '93 Accord at 100k miles (mainly due to slackness
on my part). I would change yours before 90k miles. An aquaintance of mine
had the timing belt on his Civic break at 115k miles. His valves became
rather bent.
I think the mechanics just want your money--60k miles is way too conservative.
But then again, if the belt is 11 years old, perhaps you should change it if
only because of the age.
Andrew
jj - 10 Oct 2004 17:16 GMT
thanks. i'll change it soon because even milage is less than 90,000 miles
but the age of the car.
thanks again. by the way i am driving in Canada
jj
>> Hi all,
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> Andrew
SoCalMike - 11 Oct 2004 02:51 GMT
> thanks. i'll change it soon because even milage is less than 90,000 miles
> but the age of the car.
my 98 civic only has 47k miles on it. i *might* do it next year, or i
might wait. like, til 2010 :)
Grahame - 10 Oct 2004 17:13 GMT
I have a 91 Accord and live in Canada and change it every 100,000 kms. The
owners manual says 144,000 kms.
> Hi all,
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> thanks,
> jj
Michael McLaren - 11 Oct 2004 22:42 GMT
really it depends on how hard the car has been drove, 90-100k is a fairly
close range, so proberly be safer at 90k
> Hi all,
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> thanks,
> jj