Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Honda Cars / October 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

how many mile/kilometer - change timing belt for accord

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
jj - 10 Oct 2004 06:53 GMT
Hi all,

i have 93 honda accord ex with about 125,000 KM on it. i checked a doc on
Honda web site and it said that 90,000 miles is point to change timing
belt. but i also checked with 2 local mechanics and was told that i should
change it around 100,000 KM.

so i am not sure which is correct. what's your opinion?

thanks,
jj
Caroline - 10 Oct 2004 12:57 GMT
Do you drive this car in the United States?

If so, the interval is 90,000 miles/6 years.

Later Accords (e.g. the 1994-1995 Accords) added that, if the car saw severe
duty (repeated short distance driving; dusty driving; severe cold driving; salty
snowy area driving; rough or muddy road driving; trailer towing driving), the
interval should be reduced to 60k miles.

See www.autozone.com 's free repair guides, then "Routine Maintenance," then
"Maintenance Schedules," where you can print out a copy of the 1993 Accord's
maintenance schedule (U.S.-driven cars).

> Hi all,
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> thanks,
> jj
John  Ings - 10 Oct 2004 13:39 GMT
>Hi all,
>
>i have 93 honda accord ex with about 125,000 KM on it. i checked a doc on
>Honda web site and it said that 90,000 miles is point to change timing
>belt. but i also checked with 2 local mechanics and was told that i should
>change it around 100,000 KM.

140,000 Km on a milage basis, but also every 72 months (6 years),
whichever is less, so you're way overdue on time.
Otto - 10 Oct 2004 16:26 GMT
>>Hi all,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>140,000 Km on a milage basis,

Is that the same as 90,000 miles on a kilometer basis?
John  Ings - 10 Oct 2004 16:42 GMT
>>140,000 Km on a milage basis,
>
>Is that the same as 90,000 miles on a kilometer basis?

Or 30,000 leagues on an under the sea basis...
aal - 10 Oct 2004 16:44 GMT
John Ings wrote:

>>>140,000 Km on a milage basis,
>>
>>Is that the same as 90,000 miles on a kilometer basis?
>
> Or 30,000 leagues on an under the sea basis...

I think it means .000000000000000000025 Parsecs
John  Ings - 10 Oct 2004 19:17 GMT
>>>>140,000 Km on a milage basis,
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>>
>I think it means .000000000000000000025 Parsecs

On an interstellar basis?

No, 0.5 light seconds  on an interplanetary basis.
Rattus the RAT - 10 Oct 2004 21:39 GMT
> >>>>140,000 Km on a milage basis,
> >>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> No, 0.5 light seconds  on an interplanetary basis.

Makes me realize... My car now has over one light second of mileage!

RAT
Otto - 11 Oct 2004 00:38 GMT
>> >>>>140,000 Km on a milage basis,
>> >>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>Makes me realize... My car now has over one light second of mileage!

Yeah, mine is around half a light-second.

Speaking of weird units, my speed is around 170,000 furlongs per
fortnight on the highway, and a fill-up takes about 100,000 cubic
barleycorns.

O.
Andrew - 10 Oct 2004 14:50 GMT
> Hi all,

> i have 93 honda accord ex with about 125,000 KM on it. i checked a doc on
> Honda web site and it said that 90,000 miles is point to change timing
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> thanks,
> jj

I changed the belt on my '93 Accord at 100k miles (mainly due to slackness
on my part). I would change yours before 90k miles. An aquaintance of mine
had the timing belt on his Civic break at 115k miles. His valves became
rather bent.

I think the mechanics just want your money--60k miles is way too conservative.
But then again, if the belt is 11 years old, perhaps you should change it if
only because of the age.

Andrew
jj - 10 Oct 2004 17:16 GMT
thanks. i'll change it soon because even milage is less than 90,000 miles
but the age of the car.

thanks again. by the way i am driving in Canada

jj

>> Hi all,
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> Andrew
SoCalMike - 11 Oct 2004 02:51 GMT
> thanks. i'll change it soon because even milage is less than 90,000 miles
> but the age of the car.

my 98 civic only has 47k miles on it. i *might* do it next year, or i
might wait. like, til 2010 :)
Grahame - 10 Oct 2004 17:13 GMT
I have a 91 Accord and live in Canada and change it every 100,000 kms. The
owners manual says 144,000 kms.

> Hi all,
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> thanks,
> jj
Michael McLaren - 11 Oct 2004 22:42 GMT
really it depends on how hard the car has been drove, 90-100k is a fairly
close range, so  proberly be safer at 90k
> Hi all,
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> thanks,
> jj
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.