Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Honda Cars / January 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

'96 vs. '98 Integra - advice?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Deeg - 17 Jan 2005 04:03 GMT
I'm shopping for a used Integra, and I've basically narrowed it down to
a couple of choices.  They're both LS models - a '98 with 72K, and a
'96 with '74K.  Both in very good condition, both with cloth interior,
both on original clutch and timing belt so no advantage there.

Here's my dilemma - I can get the '96 for about $5500, and the '98 for
$6800.  Obviously there's some value difference based on the model
year, but is there any significant mechanical or features-based reason
why a '98 with the same miles should be better?  Both are clean titles
on the second owner.  I don't see any major changes on the specs over
those two years - though unless I'm mistaken I believe the '96 actually
has 15" wheels vs. 14's on the '98.

Which do you guys think is the better deal?  Thanks for the advice.

Dan
John  Ings - 17 Jan 2005 13:44 GMT
>Which do you guys think is the better deal?  

The one whose seller you can persuade to change the timing belt.
They're both due.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.