>>>>>should i buy castrol or penzoil or valvoline oil. Which brand
>>>>>of oil do u
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
>
> So you take an 89 Civic and just put in synthetic? So I guess the
> your seals are bad in the first place doesn't really matter to you. The
> only thing synthetic did was clean your engine and seals of crud that
> accumulated and now they are leaking. Put the old dino oil back in and
> hopefully it will sludge up enough again to seal the engine up for you.
> >>>>>should i buy castrol or penzoil or valvoline oil. Which brand
> >>>>>of oil do u
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
> >
> > So you take an 89 Civic and just put in synthetic? So I guess the
> fact that
> > your seals are bad in the first place doesn't really matter to you. The
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> >
> sorry to burst your little bubble, but castrol is semi-synthetic too.
> it simply has a much better base & superior additive package than that
> ford garbage. that's also why it doesn't leave the engine rattling like
> a bag of nails. that ok for you?
What the heck is "synthetic" these days? I'm getting the feeling that
in order to get decent performance out of a 5W-20, even the so-called
"conventional" 5W-20 oils are using some Group III or PAO base oils.
As for Castrol - they're rumored to used older "Group I" base oil for
most of the Castrol GTX lineup, while most others have gone to more
advanced "Group II". Pennzoil calls their base oil "PureBase", Chevron
uses "IsoSyn", while others just say "group II".
jim beam - 13 Apr 2005 04:19 GMT
>>>>>>>should i buy castrol or penzoil or valvoline oil. Which brand
>>>>>>>of oil do u
[quoted text clipped - 108 lines]
> advanced "Group II". Pennzoil calls their base oil "PureBase", Chevron
> uses "IsoSyn", while others just say "group II".
good observations. the only thing we know for sure is that these words
are the product of the marketing department, not the lab.
while something like castrol gtx may not be the best of the best, from
my viewpoint, any oil that can clean the crud out of old engines like so
many of the clunkers i've had leaving them looking pretty much deposit
free, any oil that does not leave your engine sounding like an old tin
can being kicked around by a couple of kids, any oil that does not make
an old motor leak like a marine oil spill disaster, has /got/ to be
worth serious consideration.
Pars - 13 Apr 2005 22:36 GMT
> > What the heck is "synthetic" these days? I'm getting the feeling that
> > in order to get decent performance out of a 5W-20, even the so-called
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> an old motor leak like a marine oil spill disaster, has /got/ to be
> worth serious consideration.
I used to only use Castrol over a decade ago when I was driving an Old rear
drive Cutlass Supreme V8 (when all 4 barrel opened up on that carburetor,
that car could chase down just about anything on 4 wheels). So, the engine
was in great shape, event though the rest of the car was quickly
disintegrating. That was awhile ago and the Castrol might have been good for
the older engine, but my comparatively newer 98 Civic runs just as well on
the Mobel 1 (230,000km of aggressive driving and no rattles on cold
startup). In the case of Jim's 89 Civic, the Castrol might be the better
choice then the Mobel-1, since the older engine (with loose seals) might
have hard time retaining it...
Pars