> from what i understand, synthetic doesn't
> destroy seals, but if you have used dino for a
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> washes away this sludge. Since the seals are
> dried out due to the above, they leak.
Old wives' tale told countless number of times over
the internet. The problem is that the polyalphaolefin
(PAO) base oil in many synthetic oils has a tendency to
shrink seals. To counter that an ester base oil and/or
seal swelling ingredients are added.
Mobil had a huge problem with leaking with the original
Mobil 1 because they didn't properly formulate it for
seal compatibility.
The other thing is that many of the "synthetic" oils
sold today don't contain PAO, but a heavily processed
petroleum oil. Most of what's sold (in the US) as
Castrol Syntec, Valvoline SynPower, QS, Pennzoil
are known to be Group III petroleum oils. It's
debatable whether or not they're "synthetic", but they
are a higher performance than what's sold as conventional
oil. Mobil is about the only company that hasn't used
a Group III oil and packaged it as a "full synthetic".
> I switched my 98 civic to synthetic at
> 100000kms. I have a little seapage at my oil
> pan, but aside from that I NEVER have to add
> oil. My car has 220000kms on it now.
With many older cars, the seals may be ready to leak.
Add a little bit of a PAO oil and it could shrink a bit
before the other ingredients soften up the seals again.
George Macdonald - 26 Apr 2005 19:04 GMT
>> from what i understand, synthetic doesn't
>> destroy seals, but if you have used dino for a
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>shrink seals. To counter that an ester base oil and/or
>seal swelling ingredients are added.
The ester *is* a swelling agent... and it's not impossible that there is
some truth to the old wives tale. I believe the branched chain paraffins
in all synthetics are somewhat more "mobile" liquids than petro basestocks.
>Mobil had a huge problem with leaking with the original
>Mobil 1 because they didn't properly formulate it for
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>oil. Mobil is about the only company that hasn't used
>a Group III oil and packaged it as a "full synthetic".
Yeah, we *think* Mobil is still using a true PAO as the principal
ingredient:-) - like many others, they truncated the info in their MSDSs a
while back so the only way to know is to do the analysis... which I'm not
sure anybody has done independently. BTW the hydrotreated petro-stocks
sold as synthetic claim to have similar structure molecules as the real
synthetics, so are likely to have a similar BuNa swell factor.

Signature
Rgds, George Macdonald
y_p_w - 26 Apr 2005 23:45 GMT
> >> from what i understand, synthetic doesn't
> >> destroy seals, but if you have used dino for a
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
> structure molecules as the real synthetics, so are likely to have
> a similar BuNa swell factor.
I've read that Group III base oils still don't have the performance
of PAOs, including inherent cold temp, high temp, and viscosity
index. Also - there seems to be a limit on how viscous a Group
III oil can be without VI improver. PAOs and PAO/ester blends are
reported to be available in a huge range of viscosities, although
it's probably not that important in automotive engines.
Mobil is still touting Mobil 1 as containing PAOs:
<http://www.mobil1.com/USA-English/MotorOil/Oils/Oils_FAQs.aspx#Mobil_1_FAQs3>
"Is Mobil 1 with SuperSyn Technology a fully synthetic motor oil?
Yes, it is. To meet the demanding requirements of today's
specifications (and our customers' expectations), Mobil 1 with
SuperSyn uses high-performance fluids, including polyalphaolefins
(PAOs), along with a proprietary system of additives. Each Mobil 1
with SuperSyn viscosity grade uses a unique combination of synthetic
fluids and selected additives in order to tailor the viscosity grade
to its specific application."
George Macdonald - 27 Apr 2005 18:16 GMT
<<snip>>
>> >The other thing is that many of the "synthetic" oils
>> >sold today don't contain PAO, but a heavily processed
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>reported to be available in a huge range of viscosities, although
>it's probably not that important in automotive engines.
I'm sure you've also read the Chevron paper on hydrocracking and its
benefits.:-)... with VI and other characteristics which are more or less as
good as PAOs.
>Mobil is still touting Mobil 1 as containing PAOs:
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>fluids and selected additives in order to tailor the viscosity grade
>to its specific application."
Well at least they do specify PAO and one hopes they are using "synthetic"
in its true sense rather than the BBB Advertising Division adopted term to
cater for Castrol. I notice that Castrol has taken down their "confession"
page.:-)

Signature
Rgds, George Macdonald
y_p_w - 27 Apr 2005 19:28 GMT
> >Mobil is still touting Mobil 1 as containing PAOs:
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> Division adopted term to cater for Castrol. I notice that
> Castrol has taken down their "confession" page.:-)
That may only apply to the Mobil 1 brand. I've heard reports that
Mobil's semi-synthetics may use group III as their "synthetic"
component.