> Obviously she's hit every pot hole in the state of Kentucky. Here's my
> question.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> being able to adjust the rear alignment???
> Please let me know if anyone else have experienced this.. Thanks...

Signature
TeGGeR®
The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/
We've had the car since it was new so I know it wasn't wrecked. Do you
think the rear control arms really need to be replaced to fix the "lack of
adjustment
issue" that the technician explained the car to have??? Are the after market
parts adjustable?? Thanks for your help....
> <snip>
>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> ensure proper camber and caster without shimming, or elongation of holes,
> or bushing replacement, or aftermarket parts.
TeGGeR® - 01 Sep 2005 00:57 GMT
>> <snip>
>>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> issue" that the technician explained the car to have??? Are the after
> market parts adjustable?? Thanks for your help....
My first question (since I don't have a manual that covers your car):
Are your readings within specifications? The shop should give you the
acceptable ranges along with your particular readings.
Your front specs appear to be within allowable range as far as I can see
based on generic Honda setup practice.
The rear camber is the only question mark here. Typically, Honda sets its
independent rear suspensions to some slight negative camber (again, with a
range). Both your rear readings appear to be out of range, but this will
mean nothing outside of odd tire wear. Your readings are probably
indicative of bushing wear.
A shimmy in the front end in this case is unrelated to your alignment. You
have a tire wearing badly somewhere. What happens when you swap the tires
front-for-rear? Does the shimmy change? If you run the flat of your palm
over the tread in both directions, is there any noticeable unevenness or
bumpiness in one direction or both?
Have either of the inner CV joints boots ever split? Have the driveshafts
ever been changed?

Signature
TeGGeR®
The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/
ESisson - 01 Sep 2005 01:26 GMT
Thaks for the reply. None of the 4 tires appear to have extreme "unusual"
wear. From the looks of the diagram,
The right front Toe is way out of spec.
The left rear toe is out of spec
The right rear camber is out of spec.
From what I can tell from your ealier post, the toe can be adjusted on the
front right.
But the Toe and Camber problems on the back cannot be adjusted without
replacing
the original parts with aftermarket "adjustable" parts. Is this correct??
Are you aware of any company that sells such parts??
CV boots look good, Drive Shafts are the original. 114K miles on the car.
>>> <snip>
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 45 lines]
> Have either of the inner CV joints boots ever split? Have the driveshafts
> ever been changed?
TeGGeR® - 01 Sep 2005 01:43 GMT
> Thaks for the reply. None of the 4 tires appear to have extreme
> "unusual" wear. From the looks of the diagram,
> The right front Toe is way out of spec.
> The left rear toe is out of spec
> The right rear camber is out of spec.
Numbers. I need numbers. Factory-specified NUMBERS.
> From what I can tell from your ealier post, the toe can be adjusted on
> the front right.
> But the Toe and Camber problems on the back cannot be adjusted without
> replacing
Rear toe can be adjusted without parts replacement (or shimming). Camber
cannot.
> the original parts with aftermarket "adjustable" parts. Is this
> correct?? Are you aware of any company that sells such parts??
Lotsa places. Ask around at your local auto parts places.

Signature
TeGGeR®
The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/
Dick - 01 Sep 2005 02:23 GMT
>> Thaks for the reply. None of the 4 tires appear to have extreme
>> "unusual" wear. From the looks of the diagram,
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>Numbers. I need numbers. Factory-specified NUMBERS.
I have the factory manuals. What can I look up for him?
Dick
Dick - 01 Sep 2005 05:56 GMT
>>> Thaks for the reply. None of the 4 tires appear to have extreme
>>> "unusual" wear. From the looks of the diagram,
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>Dick
OK. Here they are anyway.
Camber - Front 0 degrees
Rear -0 degrees 30 minutes
Caster 2 degrees 48 minutes
Total Toe - Front 0 mm (0.in.)
Rear 2mm (1/1/16 in.)
These are the same for both the V6 and I4
Dick
TeGGeR® - 01 Sep 2005 01:15 GMT
> We've had the car since it was new so I know it wasn't wrecked. Do you
> think the rear control arms really need to be replaced to fix the
> "lack of adjustment issue" that the technician explained the car to
> have???
I never really answered your question, in hindsight. So...
No, it's not really necessary, unless you want you tires to last as long as
they're advertised to, or unless you drive extremely aggressively.
> Are the aftermarket parts adjustable??
Yes, you can get aftermarket parts that do just about anything. And in your
case, they may cost just about as much as replacing the worn bushings that
are causing your excessive negative camber.
I'd leave it alone, and just rotate my tires a bit more often, if it were
me.

Signature
TeGGeR®
The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/