Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Honda Cars / October 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

You EVER hit VTEC ?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
boobie - 09 Nov 2005 03:12 GMT
I have been wondering about VTEC engagement....

Judging by the manner the "majority" of people (in the US) drive
and narrowing down to Honda owners....

I am pretty sure most Honda owners either very, very rarely or NEVER
hit VTEC,
I mean especially owners with A/T,..I really think most NEVER ever hit VTEC.

I mean I think most people just never rev that high (5~6 K) to get into
VTEC...

don't you think ?
AZ Nomad - 09 Nov 2005 03:55 GMT
>I have been wondering about VTEC engagement....

>Judging by the manner the "majority" of people (in the US) drive
>and narrowing down to Honda owners....

>I am pretty sure most Honda owners either very, very rarely or NEVER
>hit VTEC,
>I mean especially owners with A/T,..I really think most NEVER ever hit VTEC.

>I mean I think most people just never rev that high (5~6 K) to get into
>VTEC...

With those little engines, you're going to hit it all the time when you need the
power.  Example:  drive west of denver into the mountains.  The engine will
lose speed in top gear and bog down;  put it in third and it'll just buzz
merily along at 5-6K.  The power is there when you need it, if a bit noisy.
jim beam - 09 Nov 2005 04:09 GMT
> I have been wondering about VTEC engagement....
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> don't you think ?

you got a good point!  most of the ricers i see in s.f. won't take it
past 4k.  can't figure out why they hate me.

otoh, when i drive my buddy's accord ex [auto], that thing goes vtec in
1st and stays there until you're well illegal.  it all depends on the
driver.
boobie - 09 Nov 2005 07:53 GMT
"jim beam"
> otoh, when i drive my buddy's accord ex [auto], that thing goes vtec in
> 1st and stays there until you're well illegal.  it all depends on the
> driver.

huh ? A/T Accord goes VTEC in 1st ??? <scratch-head>
Sparky Spartacus - 09 Nov 2005 08:34 GMT
> "jim beam"
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> huh ? A/T Accord goes VTEC in 1st ??? <scratch-head>

Probably with the loud pedal to the metal.
jim beam - 09 Nov 2005 14:16 GMT
>> "jim beam"
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Probably with the loud pedal to the metal.

;)
Brandy  Alexandre - 09 Nov 2005 05:20 GMT
boobie <boobie.webdeveloper@mailnull.com> wrote in
rec.autos.makers.honda:

> I have been wondering about VTEC engagement....
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> don't you think ?

Depends on the driver, I would think.  While I just recently got a car
with VTEC, I've been waiting for the opportunity to really take it out
after break-in.  I don't doubt that it will be engaged a lot.  ;)

Signature

Brandy  Alexandre®
http://www.swydm.com/?refer=BrandyAlx
Well, would you?

boobie - 09 Nov 2005 07:53 GMT
> Brandy Alexandre®
> http://www.swydm.com/?refer=BrandyAlx
> Well, would you?

what the heck is that wensite about lol ! it's like a secret society haha
Gordon McGrew - 09 Nov 2005 05:50 GMT
>I have been wondering about VTEC engagement....
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>don't you think ?

I hit it every day.  Any chance I get really.  I drive a '94 integra
GS-R 5 speed.
Elmo P. Shagnasty - 09 Nov 2005 10:49 GMT
> I have been wondering about VTEC engagement....
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> I mean I think most people just never rev that high (5~6 K) to get into
> VTEC...

02 Odyssey, VTEC comes in between 4000 and 4500rpm...and Dr. Jekyll
turns into Mr. Hyde.

I hit it all the time when I drive the van, and I rarely drive the van...

when I had the 92 Civic Si, I was into to every time I drove the car.
robm - 09 Nov 2005 16:33 GMT
> > I have been wondering about VTEC engagement....
> >
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> when I had the 92 Civic Si, I was into to every time I drove the car.

amen and booyah from me w/ 93 civic Si  5 spd
VTEC almost every drive

I do not know about 5-6K, mine feels like i can engage around 4-4.5 k  under
right conditions

need it especially on highway here, everyone thinks they are racing
somewhere and their goal in life is not to let you get in front of them,
which is fine (just slip behind right) except there is another guy right
behind that one with the same notion and the on-rampers get same treatment ?
where VTEC is handy

i just wish i had that 1.6 DOHC 160hp monster in the civic, watch the jaws
drop on those un-suspecting passer-bys
Jamco - 09 Nov 2005 16:43 GMT
lol, kinda funny your calling the 160HP a monster, and yet if you read the
RSX forums, the people with the base RSX (160HP Engine, and no true vtec)
are considered SLOW

>> > I have been wondering about VTEC engagement....
>> >
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
> i just wish i had that 1.6 DOHC 160hp monster in the civic, watch the jaws
> drop on those un-suspecting passer-bys
robm - 09 Nov 2005 17:10 GMT
well relatively speaking 160 is a monster, i am about 120 hp w/vtec and i
find it fun to drive so  160 hp ought to give quite a nice kick in the pants
giving more fun (i would hope)

160hp  RSX slow ? i think it is more relativity at work there,  whats the
comparison 220/240/260  hp

now that would be monster in a civic

> lol, kinda funny your calling the 160HP a monster, and yet if you read the
> RSX forums, the people with the base RSX (160HP Engine, and no true vtec)
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
> > i just wish i had that 1.6 DOHC 160hp monster in the civic, watch the jaws
> > drop on those un-suspecting passer-bys
Jonathan Upright - 09 Nov 2005 18:37 GMT
> well relatively speaking 160 is a monster, i am about 120 hp w/vtec and i
> find it fun to drive so  160 hp ought to give quite a nice kick in the pants
[quoted text clipped - 59 lines]
>
>>>drop on those un-suspecting passer-bys

Get the new 2006 Civic Si; 197hp from the factory.  "It'll reverse your
thinking."  ;-)  I personally would love to have one.

Jonathan

P.S.  Imagine what that engine would do with a cold-air intake,
hi-performance exhaust system, new cam gear, turbo, etc.  ;-)
robm - 09 Nov 2005 20:36 GMT
> > well relatively speaking 160 is a monster, i am about 120 hp w/vtec and i
> > find it fun to drive so  160 hp ought to give quite a nice kick in the pants
[quoted text clipped - 67 lines]
> P.S.  Imagine what that engine would do with a cold-air intake,
> hi-performance exhaust system, new cam gear, turbo, etc.  ;-)

me too

Thats exactly why i try NOT to keep up with latest cars, I'll want one.
maybe i can go look and not touch, doubtful
Jim Yanik - 09 Nov 2005 23:37 GMT
> Get the new 2006 Civic Si; 197hp from the factory.  "It'll reverse
> your thinking."  ;-)  I personally would love to have one.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> P.S.  Imagine what that engine would do with a cold-air intake,
> hi-performance exhaust system, new cam gear, turbo, etc.  ;-)

It may already incorporate some of those mods. (CAI and exhaust,cam.)

Signature

Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net

Jamco - 10 Nov 2005 01:05 GMT
yup, its basically a poor mans RSX...to bad they made it butt ugly :(

>> well relatively speaking 160 is a monster, i am about 120 hp w/vtec and i
>> find it fun to drive so  160 hp ought to give quite a nice kick in the
[quoted text clipped - 69 lines]
> P.S.  Imagine what that engine would do with a cold-air intake,
> hi-performance exhaust system, new cam gear, turbo, etc.  ;-)
a95295823943 - 11 Nov 2005 20:04 GMT
Except that the 06 Civic SI has LSD.  The 2006 Civic SI is faster than
the RSX-S.

If you want to know how it would do with those mods, go to
clubrsx.com.  Some guys are with the Cybernation Turbo and running
12's.  A CAI/RH/Exhaust/Hondata should easily get it in the high 13's.

>yup, its basically a poor mans RSX...to bad they made it butt ugly :(
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>> P.S.  Imagine what that engine would do with a cold-air intake,
>> hi-performance exhaust system, new cam gear, turbo, etc.  ;-)
Jamco - 11 Nov 2005 21:04 GMT
but its still ugly!

> Except that the 06 Civic SI has LSD.  The 2006 Civic SI is faster than
> the RSX-S.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>>> P.S.  Imagine what that engine would do with a cold-air intake,
>>> hi-performance exhaust system, new cam gear, turbo, etc.  ;-)
TWW - 12 Nov 2005 13:53 GMT
> Except that the 06 Civic SI has LSD.  The 2006 Civic SI is faster than
> the RSX-S.

How do you know  -- they are not on the showroom floors yet.  I thought
Honda only had pre-production models which make for poor comparisons.

> If you want to know how it would do with those mods, go to
> clubrsx.com.  Some guys are with the Cybernation Turbo and running
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> >> P.S.  Imagine what that engine would do with a cold-air intake,
> >> hi-performance exhaust system, new cam gear, turbo, etc.  ;-)
tegan.trejo@gmail.com - 14 Nov 2005 06:43 GMT
actually they hit dealers in less than amonth =x
Sparky Spartacus - 11 Nov 2005 06:45 GMT
<snip>

> P.S.  Imagine what that engine would do with a cold-air intake,
> hi-performance exhaust system, new cam gear, turbo, etc.  ;-)

Probably explode.

;)
GingerGSR - 11 Oct 2006 14:39 GMT
I have a 96 Ex Coupe with a JDM B18C that is from a Honda Integra SiR in
Japan. It put out 180 HP from the factory. I've added a CAI, a Type-R header,
2.5" exaust and high flow cat and muffler and it now puts out around 200 HP.
It is a treat to drive. Pulls hard through all gears without any bogging. 0-
60 in 5 sec. 60-80 in 3sec. Monster? No, but a couple BMW's are missing their
doors.

>well relatively speaking 160 is a monster, i am about 120 hp w/vtec and i
>find it fun to drive so  160 hp ought to give quite a nice kick in the pants
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>> > i just wish i had that 1.6 DOHC 160hp monster in the civic, watch the jaws
>> > drop on those un-suspecting passer-bys
boobie - 09 Nov 2005 19:50 GMT
"Jamco"
> lol, kinda funny your calling the 160HP a monster, and yet if you read the
> RSX forums, the people with the base RSX (160HP Engine, and no true vtec)
> are considered SLOW

haha exactly
I have TSX (2.4 DOHC i-VTEC) and it IS a rather "slow" car **BUT** can be
driven fast !
You just gotta rev the hell out of it and yes, that engine begs for it.

Last car was good-ol' M/T Legend...VTEC all teh time, now the  A/T  TSX I
got goes into VTEC @ 6K
So unless I use the sportshift I've never been able to hit VTEC :(
chris - 09 Nov 2005 21:14 GMT
My 2000 civic SiR (US Si) acts like a regular civic under 5500rpms.   Once
vtec engages it's noticable, but I wouldn't call it a MONSTER.

chris

> "Jamco"
> > lol, kinda funny your calling the 160HP a monster, and yet if you read the
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> got goes into VTEC @ 6K
> So unless I use the sportshift I've never been able to hit VTEC :(
TWW - 10 Nov 2005 00:46 GMT
> I have been wondering about VTEC engagement....
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> don't you think ?

My Prelude runs along @4200 rpm at 80 -- VTEC comes on around 5300 rpm.  I
normally shift around 5,000 but will frequently run up to 6000 -- which is
well short of the redline at 7400.  In other words, I probably run into the
VTEC range several time a day and certainly when I am accelerating to get on
the freeway where the traffic moves at 75-85.
Pars - 15 Nov 2005 02:22 GMT
If I had a VTEC in my DX engine, I'd be hitting it at just about every stop
light. Even so, I'm not hurting, since my DX engine has yet to be beaten by
the SOHC VTEC. (However, I have been spanked by the DOHC version).

Pars
98 Civic Hatch

> I have been wondering about VTEC engagement....
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> don't you think ?
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.