Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Honda Cars / January 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

97 Accord 105K servicing recommendations?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Steve Noll - 02 Jan 2006 21:17 GMT
97 Accord LX Wagon, 2.2L, 4 cyl, Auto, Air.  Runs fine.

It's time for the 105K servicing, which means timing & timing balancer
belts, and all the usual stuff (I adhere precisely to the factory
recommended maintenance recommendations.)  Add to that tranny fluid (I
tend to go through transmissions) and a fuel filter.

My question is - what else should I have done that's not in the
factory recommended maintenance schedule to head off potential
problems with an Accord of this age?

Thanks,
Steve in Ventura CA
'Curly Q. Links' - 02 Jan 2006 23:14 GMT
> 97 Accord LX Wagon, 2.2L, 4 cyl, Auto, Air.  Runs fine.
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Thanks,
> Steve in Ventura CA

--------------------------------

Timing belt is overdue by a couple of years, and the manual is WAY too
conservative about the ATF. I would have done it at 50,000 Km (30,000
Miles)

Changing the ATF (with Honda fluid) is the way to prevent premature
failures. Having owned a CR-V I can tell you just how WRONG a Honda
manual can be.

'Curly'
Steve Noll - 03 Jan 2006 00:38 GMT
>> 97 Accord LX Wagon, 2.2L, 4 cyl, Auto, Air.  Runs fine.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
>'Curly'

I had the tranny fluid changed at 30K, 46K, 63K, 82K, 91K, and 98K.
That's the one thing I have done in excess of the factory specs.  Yes,
I have transmission failure paranoia.   After having had to have them
rebuit in a couple past vehicles.... seems like cheap insurance (but
no guarantee.)

I'm trying to find out, what's the next likely thing to crap out that
I might be able to head off.

Steve
SoCalMike - 04 Jan 2006 01:35 GMT
> I'm trying to find out, what's the next likely thing to crap out that
> I might be able to head off.

id only be paranoid if i had the V6/automatic. youve got the 4cyl, and
*should* be "safe".

sounds like you take care of everything well and on time. dont think
there are any known issues with that year/model. hows the brake fluid?
dos/did it require a valve adjustment?
Steve Noll - 04 Jan 2006 14:43 GMT
>> I'm trying to find out, what's the next likely thing to crap out that
>> I might be able to head off.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>there are any known issues with that year/model. hows the brake fluid?
>dos/did it require a valve adjustment?

It got a valve adjustment and brake fluid replacement at 90K.  Next
valve adjustment due at 120K.

Thanks,
Steve
SoCalMike - 04 Jan 2006 01:32 GMT
> 97 Accord LX Wagon, 2.2L, 4 cyl, Auto, Air.  Runs fine.
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> factory recommended maintenance schedule to head off potential
> problems with an Accord of this age?

every 3 years, heres what i do to my 98 civic:

oil/filter change
new spark plugs
new air filter
drain/replace coolant
replace brake fluid
replace clutch fluid

so id add brake fluid to the list if it isnt on there already

> Thanks,
> Steve in Ventura CA
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.