
Signature
TeGGeR®
The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/
> "gmctruck68" <gmctruck68@aol.com> wrote in
> > How do I lube a 4 speed manual transmission, in the 88-91 Civic Hatch? I
> > know I have to use gear lube, but where do I put it?!?
> in the side of the tranny case pointing at the right front wheel. The upper
> one is a fill, the lower one a drain.
http://www.tegger.com/hondafaq/misc/92-95_civic_mt_oil_chang
e.pdf
> The above PDF is from the '92-'95 Civic, but the plug locations are the
> same as yours. The drain plug takes the square drive of a ratchet. Scrape
> out the dirt before inserting the ratchet to make sure it goes in far
> enough not to strip as you try to crack the drain loose. If the plugs have
> not been removed in a long time, you may have great difficulty breaking
> them loose.
A 1.5 foot breaker bar should be sufficient, though as
always, be careful. Brace yourself so you don't get hurt,
etc.
> To fill, you need to have the car LEVEL, and you'll need a pump to attach
> to your lube bottle (a lot like a hand-soap bottle pump). The pump needs to
> have a clear vinyl hose that goes into the fill hole.
Gravity feed works fine for 88-91 Civics; no pump is
necessary.
Buy the clear tubing at Lowe's or Home Depot for a few
bucks, tops, probably. Three feet should be plenty.
> And use Honda MTL, not "gear lube" or the 10W-30 specifed in the workshop
> manual.
Elaboration: Reports are that superior shifting occurs with
the Honda MT fluid. More importantly, there are many claims
on Usenet that 10W-30 and -40 have changed since about 1991
such that their chemistry is deleterious to the
transmission. I don't buy that--yet. I have always used my
91 Civic's manual-specified 10W-30 or 10W-40. No problems
after 173k miles. Anyone saying there will be problems down
the road is speculating based on rumor innuendo. (Unless
someone finally has coughed up a reputable citation on the
subject.)
If Honda thought 10W-30 or -40 today is dangerous to the
transmission, I think they would have said something.
www.autozone.com has a free online repair guide /specific/
to the 88-91 Civic that covers manual transmission fluid
changes. With drawings and photos.
TeGGeR® - 08 Jan 2006 21:39 GMT
<snip>
> A 1.5 foot breaker bar should be sufficient, though as
> always, be careful. Brace yourself so you don't get hurt,
> etc.
And make certain the ratchet square is well seated. You don't want to round
off the square in the bolt.
>> To fill, you need to have the car LEVEL, and you'll need a
> pump to attach
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Gravity feed works fine for 88-91 Civics; no pump is
> necessary.
Gravity works fine for my car too, and I used that method for years. But
I've since found it's easier using the inexpensive hand-pump.
> Buy the clear tubing at Lowe's or Home Depot for a few
> bucks, tops, probably. Three feet should be plenty.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> such that their chemistry is deleterious to the
> transmission. I don't buy that--yet.
The anti-wear additives (ZDDP, for example) that used to be present in
motor oils have been greatly reduced or eliminated in the interests of
protecting the catalytic converter. Transmissions have no cat issues, so
Honda MTF has loads of anti-wear additives (hence its distinctive odor).
> I have always used my
> 91 Civic's manual-specified 10W-30 or 10W-40. No problems
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> If Honda thought 10W-30 or -40 today is dangerous to the
> transmission, I think they would have said something.
They have.
An example from the '02 RS-X manual (pg 13-4):
"Always use Honda Manual Transmission Fluid (MTF). Using motor oil can
cause stiffer shifting because it does not contain the correct additives."

Signature
TeGGeR®
The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/
TeGGeR® - 08 Jan 2006 21:47 GMT
>> If Honda thought 10W-30 or -40 today is dangerous to the
>> transmission, I think they would have said something.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> cause stiffer shifting because it does not contain the correct
> additives."
Just checked the '96-'00 Civic Helm manual. It contains the same warning,
word for word.

Signature
TeGGeR®
The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/
E Meyer - 09 Jan 2006 13:23 GMT
On 1/8/06 3:47 PM, in article Xns9745AB0BBA8A6tegger@207.14.113.17,
>>> If Honda thought 10W-30 or -40 today is dangerous to the
>>> transmission, I think they would have said something.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Just checked the '96-'00 Civic Helm manual. It contains the same warning,
> word for word.
Go back another decade to the generation the OP has and check again. We had
an '81 and an '87 and the recommended manual trans fluid was 10w-30 motor
oil. There was also a caveat to not use synthetic because the synchros
wouldn't work correctly with it.
TeGGeR® - 09 Jan 2006 15:11 GMT
> On 1/8/06 3:47 PM, in article Xns9745AB0BBA8A6tegger@207.14.113.17,
<snip>
>> Just checked the '96-'00 Civic Helm manual. It contains the same
>> warning, word for word.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> 10w-30 motor oil. There was also a caveat to not use synthetic
> because the synchros wouldn't work correctly with it.
Yes, and my '91 Integra's shop manual also specifies 10W-30.
But the point is that the motor oils in use now are not the same as those
available in 1991. Honda's metallurgy for synchros is unlikely to have
changed more than motor oil formulation.
It appears that the changeover to the MTF specification coincides with the
planning and implementation of much stricter OBD-II emission controls,
which would have been the primary driver behind zinc and sulfur reductions
in motor oils.
Synthetic motor oils have greater film strength than mineral oils and are
meant to reduce friction as much as possible. Synchros require friction to
function. If the synchros cannot work correctly with the oil film that lies
between their surfaces, they cannot correctly apply the friction that makes
them work. Zinc and sulfur are sort of "sacrificial anodes", taking the
brunt of the friction before the underlying synchro metal does, should the
oil film break, which it will under heavy use. This is the reason Honda's
MTF has the additives it does.
Honda MTF is the preferable oil for any Honda manual transmission that
originally specified 10W-30.

Signature
TeGGeR®
The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/
Rob B - 11 Jan 2006 18:17 GMT
> > On 1/8/06 3:47 PM, in article Xns9745AB0BBA8A6tegger@207.14.113.17,
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Yes, and my '91 Integra's shop manual also specifies 10W-30.
<snip>
> Honda MTF is the preferable oil for any Honda manual transmission that
> originally specified 10W-30.
I plant o use MTF next as well but....
my '93 civic honda sevice manual says 10w30 or 10w40 with a service grade
of SF or SG
would not the sevice grade SF / SG matching cover the concerns of oil
formulation.
robb
E Meyer - 11 Jan 2006 23:56 GMT
On 1/11/06 12:17 PM, in article
VYbxf.6657$%W1.3599@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net, "Rob B"
<RobB@where.on.net> wrote:
>>> On 1/8/06 3:47 PM, in article Xns9745AB0BBA8A6tegger@207.14.113.17,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> robb
Lubrication wise, yes. But those ratings relate to the oil being used as
motor oil, not transmission oil. The problem with synthetic (i.e. Mobil 1)
was that it was (is) too slippery for the synchros to work correctly. They
depend on a little friction to get them moving.
TeGGeR® - 12 Jan 2006 01:05 GMT
> I plant o use MTF next as well but....
>
> my '93 civic honda sevice manual says 10w30 or 10w40 with a service
> grade of SF or SG
Yeah. It was printed before the changes to oil configuration, as I said a
few messages ago.
> would not the sevice grade SF / SG matching cover the concerns of oil
> formulation.
SF & SG are obsolete. Good luck finding that stuff these days. All you'll
find now is SL and SM.

Signature
TeGGeR®
The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/
Rob B - 12 Jan 2006 03:06 GMT
> > would not the sevice grade SF / SG matching cover the concerns of oil
> > formulation.
>
> SF & SG are obsolete. Good luck finding that stuff these days. All you'll
> find now is SL and SM.
well that is the issue then, *if* you could find SF/SG then you'd be ok but
10w30 spec is useless by itself ... where most people seem to be betting on
10w30 == 10w30 not
robb
SoCalMike - 12 Jan 2006 05:10 GMT
> would not the sevice grade SF / SG matching cover the concerns of oil
> formulation.
if you can find oil that old. the concerns these days are all the
friction reducers put into current oil grades that MIGHT cause the
syncros to not work right.
too much slipperiness can be a bad thing.
Elle - 08 Jan 2006 22:13 GMT
"TeGGeR®" <tegger@tegger.c0m> wrote
E
> > If Honda thought 10W-30 or -40 today is dangerous to the
> > transmission, I think they would have said something.
>
> They have.
Sort of. But I don't discount the substance of what you
cited.
> An example from the '02 RS-X manual (pg 13-4):
> "Always use Honda Manual Transmission Fluid (MTF). Using motor oil can
> cause stiffer shifting because it does not contain the correct additives."
ISTM a manual transmission is pretty much a manual
transmission, so I agree that what's written in the 2002
Honda manual you cite above should apply to any year's
transmission, including my 1991 Civic's. In the future, I
will take note of it in posts, as it is helpful.
OTOH, I remain hesitant to translate this to a prediction of
disaster if one uses 10W-30 or -40. I can see that "stiffer
shifting" implies more wear, but ISTM it might be
negligible. Especially since the statement is qualified with
"can cause" vs. "will cause." To read this like a lawyer
blah blah...
So I'm not panicked on this point. My intent, stated in the
recent past, is to switch my 91 Civic to Honda MTF when the
next tranny oil change is required, see if the shifting is
superior, and draw more conclusions then.