Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Honda Cars / February 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

buy new or used

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
noreplysoccer@hotmail.com - 30 Jan 2006 19:40 GMT
my wife has a new job, will drive upwards of 600 miles/week local
travel.

current car is not a honda :(

we know better now.

Considering a used civic or a new hybrid civic.  Could anyone suggest
which might be more economical

if we financed car, it would be for 3 years (or less).  The hybrid we
saw yesterday was around $25000k in cincinnati.
Elmo P. Shagnasty - 31 Jan 2006 02:13 GMT
> my wife has a new job, will drive upwards of 600 miles/week local
> travel.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Considering a used civic or a new hybrid civic.  Could anyone suggest
> which might be more economical

Used Lexus.  Cheap, and will hold up tremendously well.  Will also be
tremendously comfortable.

The important point is, the Lexus will depreciate faster than a
Honda--which means either (a) you get a better car than a Honda for the
same money, or (b) you'll get the same quality car as a Honda for less
money.

Don't buy a new car for this kind of thing.  The depreciation will kill
you.  It just doesn't make sense.
SoCalMike - 31 Jan 2006 05:19 GMT
> Don't buy a new car for this kind of thing.  The depreciation will kill
> you.  It just doesn't make sense.

peace of mind. if youre starting out with a 0 mile car and taking care
of it, youll know itll last. depreciation isnt really a factor if youre
going to use the car up anyway.
jim beam - 31 Jan 2006 05:31 GMT
>>my wife has a new job, will drive upwards of 600 miles/week local
>>travel.
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> Don't buy a new car for this kind of thing.  The depreciation will kill
> you.  It just doesn't make sense.

depreciation on a civic is insanely low, or at least, it is here in the
bay area.  on the dealers lot, a used civic with 30k on the clock is
often within $5k of a new sticker.  that's nuts.  in that case, buying
new is the only way to go.

adding to that, i drive an 89 civic.  depreciation on that in the last
year has been negative - prices have gone /up/ due to it's economy with
increasing gas prices!
SoCalMike - 31 Jan 2006 05:17 GMT
> my wife has a new job, will drive upwards of 600 miles/week local
> travel.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Considering a used civic or a new hybrid civic.  Could anyone suggest
> which might be more economical

hybrids arent worth it, especially on the highway. get one because you
WANT one, not for the mileage you (likely wont) achieve. or for the
carpool privileges :)

best bet would be something new, small, and gas-powered from honda or
toyota. civic, matrix or corolla.

even better mileage wise would be a toyota yaris or honda jazz, neither
of which is out yet. then theres the scion xA or xB...

the scions and yaris use a 1.5l w/VVTi, and get upwards of 40mpg on the
highway.
Elmo P. Shagnasty - 31 Jan 2006 11:55 GMT
> even better mileage wise would be a toyota yaris or honda jazz, neither
> of which is out yet. then theres the scion xA or xB...
>
> the scions and yaris use a 1.5l w/VVTi, and get upwards of 40mpg on the
> highway.

Mileage-wise there's the VW diesels, but that's all one can say about
VWs.

(sigh) imagine if Honda sold a diesel engine car here...
G-man422 - 31 Jan 2006 12:35 GMT
new honda> IMO.

Signature

G-man422

http://www.automotiveforums.com

bakechad - 31 Jan 2006 17:47 GMT
I just traded in a 2003 Civic with 18,302 miles and the dealer is
asking $14,000 for it.  For not much more you could buy a new one.  To
save any real money on a Honda you need to go +5 years old.
Elmo P. Shagnasty - 31 Jan 2006 21:50 GMT
> To
> save any real money on a Honda you need to go +5 years old.

Yes--even with Accord.

Same goes for Toyota.

But for some reason, the Lexus ES--same size as Camry--depreciates
FASTER.

So you buy used, get a *great* deal, AND you get a car that's built
better than either Accord or Camry.
Alex Rodriguez - 01 Feb 2006 17:17 GMT
>> To
>> save any real money on a Honda you need to go +5 years old.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>But for some reason, the Lexus ES--same size as Camry--depreciates
>FASTER.

Camry = Lexus ES .  Just take a peek at the chasis and engine and this is
easy to see.  The Lexus will have some more options, but that's about it.

>So you buy used, get a *great* deal, AND you get a car that's built
>better than either Accord or Camry.

Smart move.
-----------
Alex
Elmo P. Shagnasty - 01 Feb 2006 23:20 GMT
> Camry = Lexus ES .  Just take a peek at the chasis and engine and this is
> easy to see.  The Lexus will have some more options, but that's about it.

Not *quite*.  Built in a different plant--built in Japan, in fact--and
the quality control for the parts and materials is incredibly higher
than that of Toyota.

While Toyota might allow a failure rate of 150 pieces per million, Lexus
allows 15 per million.  Or whatever.  The point is, the parts *aren't*
the same.

And yet it depreciates FASTER than the Camry.

Go figure.
Gordon McGrew - 02 Feb 2006 01:47 GMT
>> Camry = Lexus ES .  Just take a peek at the chasis and engine and this is
>> easy to see.  The Lexus will have some more options, but that's about it.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
>Go figure.

Consumer Reports Reliability records for 4 cyl. Camry and ES are
different which indicates that CR decided not to just lump them
together.  The records are similar and both very good overall.  The ES
is much better on suspension, engine and cooling and somewhat better
in a few other areas,  The Camry has better transmission reliability
and brakes.  A clear quality difference but both cars are really at
the top of the game.  

Comparing ES with 4 cyl. Accord is a closer match than with the Camry.
The ES is better on transmission, exhaust, and maybe slightly better
in a few other areas.  Accord is better on brakes, suspension and
maybe electrical.  In most areas, it's a toss-up.
jim beam - 02 Feb 2006 04:28 GMT
>>Camry = Lexus ES .  Just take a peek at the chasis and engine and this is
>>easy to see.  The Lexus will have some more options, but that's about it.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> And yet it depreciates FASTER than the Camry.

perceived cost of maintenance is higher, thus a higher depreciation
rate.  whether or not it's true is irrelevant.

> Go figure.
K Lam - 01 Feb 2006 20:49 GMT
>>To
>>save any real money on a Honda you need to go +5 years old.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> So you buy used, get a *great* deal, AND you get a car that's built
> better than either Accord or Camry.

So does the same thing applies for Acuras? Do they have better build
quality but yet faster depreciation?

Kevin
Elmo P. Shagnasty - 01 Feb 2006 23:18 GMT
> > So you buy used, get a *great* deal, AND you get a car that's built
> > better than either Accord or Camry.
>
> So does the same thing applies for Acuras? Do they have better build
> quality but yet faster depreciation?

Less so.
SoCalMike - 02 Feb 2006 03:14 GMT
>>> So you buy used, get a *great* deal, AND you get a car that's built
>>> better than either Accord or Camry.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Less so.

in europe, even the acuras have honda namebadges.
Alex Rodriguez - 31 Jan 2006 18:59 GMT
>my wife has a new job, will drive upwards of 600 miles/week local
>travel.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>Considering a used civic or a new hybrid civic.  Could anyone suggest
>which might be more economical

Used is always more economical.  Just make sure you inspect the car carefully.
---------------
Alex
noreplysoccer@hotmail.com - 01 Feb 2006 16:01 GMT
I appreciate the opinions.  I was referred here from
misc.financial.planning

I'd like to see the numbers more than just read opinions.

I have priced the civic hybrid at $25,000
what does a gas civic cost new?

is their a mileage comparison based on experience?

if car is going to be used for lots of traveling, why would I want a
Lexus or other car which depreciates quickly?

we do plan to drive car for YEARS.  preferably 10-15.
Elmo P. Shagnasty - 01 Feb 2006 16:10 GMT
> I have priced the civic hybrid at $25,000
> what does a gas civic cost new?

Which model?

> if car is going to be used for lots of traveling, why would I want a
> Lexus or other car which depreciates quickly?

If the car is going to be used for traveling, you don't want to pay the
premium to get a hybrid.  Hybrids do their thing in stop and go city
driving.  Highway traveling, the hybrid offers nothing.

If you're buying new, you're right--don't get a Lexus that depreciates
quickly.

On the other hand, a 2 to 5 year old Lexus is a far, far better value
than a new Honda or Toyota.  Someone else has already taken that huge
depreciation hit, but the car is still a superior piece of work than
even its Toyota cousin.

If you plan to keep the car for 10 to 15 years, depreciation isn't an
issue.  You want build quality, period.  Lexus is it--but not far behind
are the Toyotas and even the Hondas.

My nephew is driving my 92 Civic Si.  It now has 140K on the clock, it's
on its original clutch, and it drives great.  Looks great, too.

On the other hand, you might look very closely at the Hyundai.  10 year
warranty and, frankly, they're the new Honda.  They've done over the
past 15 years what Honda did over the previous 15 years--came from
nowhere, got a lot of snickers, and now are pushing the big boys around
a bit with respectable cars.

GM and Ford snickered at Honda once, and look at them.  Honda and Toyota
had better not snicker at Hyundai, lest they be forced to eat crow.
Timothy J. Lee - 01 Feb 2006 22:52 GMT
>On the other hand, a 2 to 5 year old Lexus is a far, far better value
>than a new Honda or Toyota.  Someone else has already taken that huge
>depreciation hit,

Be careful about "new car depreciation".  Much of the "new car
depreciation" is the difference between dealer retail and trade-in
values, so the amount you save by buying used is less than the amount
you lose by buying new and then trading in.

>but the car is still a superior piece of work than
>even its Toyota cousin.

Why would it be superior in any way other than added luxury features?

Signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Timothy J. Lee
Unsolicited bulk or commercial email is not welcome.
No warranty of any kind is provided with this message.

Elmo P. Shagnasty - 01 Feb 2006 23:21 GMT
> >but the car is still a superior piece of work than
> >even its Toyota cousin.
>
> Why would it be superior in any way other than added luxury features?

Different plant and different parts being managed differently with
different acceptable failure rates.

The supplier can't afford to peddle prone-to-fail components to the
Lexus side of the house.
Timothy J. Lee - 01 Feb 2006 22:46 GMT
>I have priced the civic hybrid at $25,000
>what does a gas civic cost new?

Try carsdirect.com and edmunds.com if you are in the US.

>if car is going to be used for lots of traveling, why would I want a
>Lexus or other car which depreciates quickly?

If you are buying a used car, fast depreciating cars tend to be
cheaper than slow depreciating cars.  Though Lexus models might
not be that economical fuel wise, which may be a concern if you
drive a lot.

Signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Timothy J. Lee
Unsolicited bulk or commercial email is not welcome.
No warranty of any kind is provided with this message.

Elle - 02 Feb 2006 05:20 GMT
I echo Timothy Lee's comment: Use www.edmunds.com , for one, especially to
appraise used cars based on mileage, condition, and features. It will also
at least generate relative price differences between new models and IIRC
cost per mile of operation.

Hybrids are so new that their longevity isn't established. There is chatter
on the net about the battery packs and how much they'll cost to replace. I'd
wager at best hybrids last as long as strictly gasoline engine Hondas, but
possibly at a higher maintenance cost, because of the battery packs. Sorry;
I don't see much concrete info beyond this right now.

I still think the April "car buying" issue of Consumer Reports is very much
a worthwhile read, to build confidence in what you're buying. Understand
that it reviews several years of /each/ model of car for reliability in
specific areas and presents it in easy-to-read format. I believe it also
gives new car prices. Lastly, it may have some good info on the Hybrids'
reliability, at least for young hybrids.

>I appreciate the opinions.  I was referred here from
> misc.financial.planning
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> we do plan to drive car for YEARS.  preferably 10-15.
SoCalMike - 03 Feb 2006 02:36 GMT
> Hybrids are so new that their longevity isn't established. There is chatter
> on the net about the battery packs and how much they'll cost to replace. I'd
> wager at best hybrids last as long as strictly gasoline engine Hondas, but
> possibly at a higher maintenance cost, because of the battery packs. Sorry;
> I don't see much concrete info beyond this right now.

i like em, but i like 4 door hatches, and the prius has all the gizmos.
only way it would be worthwhile would be IF it was "carpool lane exempt".
pars - 02 Feb 2006 01:59 GMT
> my wife has a new job, will drive upwards of 600 miles/week local
> travel.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> if we financed car, it would be for 3 years (or less).  The hybrid we
> saw yesterday was around $25000k in cincinnati.

Another car that goes for about 25K is the A3. If I were doing a lot of
highway,
I'd go for the turbo engine instead of the Hybrid.

Pars
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.