Just a minor correction.... the 2005 does not have a fix a flat can in the
trunk. It has a small compressor, a jack, and a patch kit. Why they didn't
put a mini spare there is beyond me.
As for the EPA, they are not due to change mileage tests for several years.
Why would the figures change?
> Just a minor correction.... the 2005 does not have a fix a flat can in the
> trunk. It has a small compressor, a jack, and a patch kit. Why they
> didn't put a mini spare there is beyond me.
Woops, but it was all for weight savings. The mini-spare and the sun roof
add about 80 pounds. That was enough to push the car into anouther EPA
class.
> As for the EPA, they are not due to change mileage tests for several
> years. Why would the figures change?
True, but there are weight/size classes now and each class has a different
mix of tests. The 2005 Accord Hybrid fit in one class and the addition of
80 pounds or so pushed the 2006 into a higher class with a different set of
criteria.
The new tests, if they are ever instituted, are supposed to be more
realistic. The current tests have all sorts of fudge factors. In the real
world, I doubt that there's much difference between the 2005 and the 2006.
Being Hondas, after about 5,000 miles to break them in and proper
maintenance, they'll probably beat the current EPA estimates.

Signature
Kent Finnell
From the Music City USA
High Tech Misfit - 09 Feb 2006 00:28 GMT
> The new tests, if they are ever instituted, are supposed to be more
> realistic. The current tests have all sorts of fudge factors. In the real
> world, I doubt that there's much difference between the 2005 and the 2006.
> Being Hondas, after about 5,000 miles to break them in and proper
> maintenance, they'll probably beat the current EPA estimates.
Yes, and my '93 Accord automatic is proof of that. EPA estimated 28mpg on
the highway, and yet I consistently get 32-34mpg.