Good report. In the past here there has been some
controversy about whether to use genuine Honda MTF for these
older Hondas or the ordinary motor oil mentioned in the
original owner's manuals.
Some or all of the more recent owner's and service manuals
comment that using the Honda MTF will result in better
shifting.
I have seen enough to be persuaded to put the Honda MTF in
my 91 Civic for the first time at the next change.
> Good report. In the past here there has been some
> controversy about whether to use genuine Honda MTF for these
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> I have seen enough to be persuaded to put the Honda MTF in
> my 91 Civic for the first time at the next change.
Ditto what Dail said.
I recently bought a 92 Accord that was, I suspect, running either
straight motor oil, or a generic gear lube. The Honda MTF has a notably
different texture and feel than what came out; thinner, with a slighty
'slimy' feel. Very slick. (The old oil was like-new clean.)
Running MTF, the shifter is MUCH smoother and easier to
move/shift/engage. The difference was surprising. If the transmission
is running as smoothly as it feels, the $13 (for 2 quarts) I left at the
dealer was worth the price.
-Greg
Matt Ion - 09 Apr 2006 21:54 GMT
>> Good report. In the past here there has been some controversy about
>> whether to use genuine Honda MTF for these older Hondas or the
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> is running as smoothly as it feels, the $13 (for 2 quarts) I left at the
> dealer was worth the price.
Wonder if I'd see a benefit from that in my '87? The manual just states
API Service Grade: SE or SF
SAE30, 10W-30, 10W-40 or 20W-40 grade oil
---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 0615-0, 04/08/2006
Tested on: 4/9/2006 1:54:38 PM
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2005 ALWIL Software.
http://www.avast.com