Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Honda Cars / April 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

91 Honda Civic Valve Cover Bolt Broke...

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
sipherx@gmail.com - 19 Apr 2006 15:51 GMT
Well I just had the fun task of changing out my waterpump on my civic,
got the thing all back in time putting everything together and the last
step was to put the valve cover on. When I was putting it on I didnt
know I wasnt supposed to put much strength into it, and it snapped the
two front bolts on my valve cover.

There are a total of 4 bolts in all that hold this valve cover down. I
was just wondering if someone knew how to replace the bad bolts and if
you have any other suggestions instead of replacing the bolts. Could I
instead take out the rubber washer and replace it with some type of
sealant and then use a nut to tighten it down.. I dont know I am kinda
lost on this one, hopefully you guys can help me out.
Elle - 19 Apr 2006 16:07 GMT
Hey, saw your post yesterday IIRC and thought I'd offer two
cents, based on my own 91 Civic and the drawings at places
Majestic Honda.

Is there anything at all left of the stud, such that you can
attach a vise grip and try to free it? Dunno if you noticed
it yet, but from
http://www.hondaautomotiveparts.com/auto/jsp/mws/prddisplay.jsp?inputstate=5&cat
cgry1=Civic&catcgry2=1991&catcgry3=4DR+LX&catcgry4=KA5MT&catcgry5=CYLINDER+HEAD+
COVER


and some drawings in my Chilton manual, these studs appear
to be threaded at both ends. Dunno why the drawing specifies
only two of these bolts. I could be missing something.

Apply PB Blaster (taking care not to let it get into the
cylinder head area), and try to free them with a vise grip
or tiny pipe wrench. If that fails, I think drilling (with
the correct size bit), and then applying the correct size
EZ-Out may work.

Hopefully you have other wheels to get you to parts stores
to troubleshoot this.

Only 7 ft-lbs of torque is needed to tighten the nuts on
these bolts. A low range torque wrench, available at places
like Harbor Freight, is a good investment for $30 or less,
typically.

> Well I just had the fun task of changing out my waterpump
> on my civic,
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> know I am kinda
> lost on this one, hopefully you guys can help me out.
sipherx@gmail.com - 19 Apr 2006 16:16 GMT
Thanks for your help, as your were probably typing this I was outside
taking my valve cover off again, and I took a 3/4 size deepwell socket
to the bolt and removed it along with the stud. It is threaded on both
sides with a nut in the middle sort of. Kinda hard to explain. But I
have a buddy with the same 91 civic as mine and his motor is crap so I
am gonna try and get someone to run me by his house to take off his
bolts, and hopefully that will solve this problem.

One more question though without having to buy another tool (i am
pretty broke right now) About how tight should I make the bolt, no more
then just one hand tight with a ratchet?

And should I replace the rubber gasket or anything?
sipherx@gmail.com - 19 Apr 2006 16:20 GMT
Heh thats the part I need right there. So just incase anyone else runs
into this problem and doesnt have a friend with a parts car, this is
the part you will most likely need.

Its on the website that the guy posted earlier, much appreciated.

83198      010      2      BOLT B, CYL HD CVR
Elle - 19 Apr 2006 16:34 GMT
> Heh thats the part I need right there. So just incase
> anyone else runs
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> 83198  010  2  BOLT B, CYL HD CVR

For the archives, the aforementioned Majestic Honda parts
site doesn't give actual Honda part numbers. One can go to
www.slhonda.com , get the same drawings and part listings,
and also get the actual Honda part numbers.

Salvage yards are also an option for getting replacement
studs.

Gal "Elle"
Elle - 19 Apr 2006 16:31 GMT
> Thanks for your help, as your were probably typing this I
> was outside
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> sides with a nut in the middle sort of. Kinda hard to
> explain.

That's consistent with the drawings at the parts site I gave
earlier. I also just googled this group's archives, and
others seem to have had plenty of success using your
approach or drilling and "EZ-outing." People also say these
studs are notorious for breaking (or, um, people are
notorious for overtorquing them beyond the required 7
ft-lbs.)

> But I
> have a buddy with the same 91 civic as mine and his motor
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> bolt, no more
> then just one hand tight with a ratchet?

I really don't even want to say anything like it's half a
turn  after you feel resistance.  I do try to keep some kind
of tabs on what force I'm applying at X distance from the
bolt centerline when I'm using an actual torque wrench. But
this is tricky. You could easily end up overtorquing or
undertorquing by 50%.

Here's a really cheap route: Go to Wal-Mart and buy one of
those fish scales that go up to maybe 20 lbs. I saw some for
around $5 not long ago. Rig something up to attach the scale
to the end of the appropriate wrench. Say the wrench is six
inches long. Then apply 14 lbs. of force, measuring with the
scale. That gives about 7 ft-lbs. of torque.

You could try to calibrate other springs you have lying on.
Use water to calibrate it. A pint of water weighs about a
pound.

> And should I replace the rubber gasket or anything?

The four rubber washers beneath the four cap nuts that go on
the studs do harden from heat and age and do eventually
leak. I'd replace them about every 100k  miles. My own 91
Civic's started leaking I think around 150k miles, 13 years.
They are $2 each online. Try www.cheapesthondaparts.com for
the best shipping prices.

I urge not going with non-OEM rubber parts for Hondas. From
my and others' experience, these do not last. You pay a
little more for the OEM rubber parts, but you really do get
more life out of them, too.

P.S. It was some guy with an Accord having busted stud
problems similar to yours who posted the other day.
notbob - 19 Apr 2006 21:18 GMT
> Here's a really cheap route: Go to Wal-Mart and buy one of
> those fish scales that go up to maybe 20 lbs. I saw some for
> around $5 not long ago. Rig something up to attach the scale
> to the end of the appropriate wrench. Say the wrench is six
> inches long. Then apply 14 lbs. of force, measuring with the
> scale. That gives about 7 ft-lbs. of torque.

Bad idea.  Spring fish scales are notoriously inaccurate.  A $5 one is
likely close to useless.  Add the likelyhood of the pull vector not
being exactly 90 deg and the pull point not being exactly 6 inches and
we're probably real close to getting back to that 50% error you were
speaking of.  The OP is saving big bucks by doing himself.  Use the
savings to get a good torque wrench.  

> You could try to calibrate other springs you have lying on.
> Use water to calibrate it. A pint of water weighs about a
> pound.

"About" adds another 4% inaccuracy.  Get a torque wrench.  

nb
TeGGeR® - 20 Apr 2006 01:00 GMT
> "About" adds another 4% inaccuracy.  Get a torque wrench.  

A cheap beam type is about $20, will work just fine and is sold in any
hardware store. It's all I use for light stuff like valve cover nuts. It's
even good for setting preload on tapered wheel bearings, as that's often a
pound or less.

What also helps is to learn what it feels like when a bolt is near its
correct torque. Feels like a sudden ramp-up in effort needed to turn the
bolt. Knowing that sensation will help prevent overtorquing when you are
unable to use a proper torque wrench on your fastener.

Signature

TeGGeR®

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/

Elle - 20 Apr 2006 02:59 GMT
>> "About" adds another 4% inaccuracy.  Get a torque wrench.

You apparently are unaware of how inaccurate the tension
applied to a bolt via torquing it is even when using a
calibrated torque wrench.

Getting a click at 7 ft-lbs. with a calibrated torque wrench
only assures one is in the ball park for proper fastening.
Chopface - 20 Apr 2006 03:22 GMT
>>>"About" adds another 4% inaccuracy.  Get a torque wrench.
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Getting a click at 7 ft-lbs. with a calibrated torque wrench
> only assures one is in the ball park for proper fastening.

Elle,

I'm not very good with the science of statistics, but I think you are
definitely wrong. Sure, if I took my 1/2", drive decent quality
(Craftsman) beam torque wrench and tried to accurately hit 7lbs. I'd
fail. The reason is, relative to the range or scale that wrench is
designed for or calibrated for, 7 ft.*lbs. isn't much. I *think* my 1/2"
wrench goes up to 150 ft.*lbs. |7|/150 is less than 5%.  I'm sure there
are torque wrenches out there(1/4" drive) that could measure that torque
accurately. Also, I think the torque measurment will not be applicable
if the fastener is deformed significantly and dirty(which I think you
were including in what you were trying to say).

Mark

P.S. When I started fixing my first Honda ('91 DX Sedan), I broke one of
the studs for the valve cover like the OP. That's when I started to
figure out that It'd be worthwhile for me to get a torque wrench. I
think you can get wrenches for bicycles that are measured in in.*lbs.
TeGGeR® - 20 Apr 2006 04:16 GMT
<snip>

> Sure, if I took my 1/2", drive decent quality
> (Craftsman) beam torque wrench and tried to accurately hit 7lbs. I'd
> fail. The reason is, relative to the range or scale that wrench is
> designed for or calibrated for, 7 ft.*lbs. isn't much.

If you broke off a valve cover stud, you didn't torque the nut to 9 or 10
lbs instead of 7, you reefed the hell out of it and squashed the rubber
donut.

In a light-duty application like this, accuracy isn't critical. What IS
critical is that you have the sense to know not to keep yanking on the
wrench because you want it just a bit tighter...maybe a little more...just
a touch more...SNAP! It's also a bad idea to try and solve a leak by
screwing the nut down more to do it. Same result.

I see similar things with idiots who think they need to jump on the tire
iron when the put their wheels back on. Wheel studs don't snap because they
were torqued to 100 instead of 80, they snap because somebody torqued them
to 300 lbs!

Signature

TeGGeR®

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/

SoCalMike - 22 Apr 2006 18:25 GMT
> I see similar things with idiots who think they need to jump on the tire
> iron when the put their wheels back on. Wheel studs don't snap because they
> were torqued to 100 instead of 80, they snap because somebody torqued them
> to 300 lbs!

and the only time ive heard of people losing lugnuts is when they arent
tightened *at all*. no torque wrench? 2 hands, push down on the tire
wrench. cant push down no mo? its done.

for the valve cover, id use a 1/4" drive, one hand, twist, done.
TeGGeR® - 24 Apr 2006 12:44 GMT
>> I see similar things with idiots who think they need to jump on the
>> tire iron when the put their wheels back on. Wheel studs don't snap
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> arent tightened *at all*. no torque wrench? 2 hands, push down on the
> tire wrench. cant push down no mo? its done.

I mean the stud BROKEN, something I see frequently. That is a bouncy-bouncy  
overtorque job.

Signature

TeGGeR®

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/

Elle - 20 Apr 2006 05:04 GMT
> Elle wrote:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> drive decent quality (Craftsman) beam torque wrench and
> tried to accurately hit 7lbs.

No, I meant even a torque wrench for which 7 ft-lbs. was
mid-range would fail to achieve with much precision the
precisely recommended tension (sic) in the bolt.

> I'd fail. The reason is, relative to the range or scale
> that wrench is designed for or calibrated for, 7 ft.*lbs.
> isn't much. I *think* my 1/2" wrench goes up to 150
> ft.*lbs. |7|/150 is less than 5%.  I'm sure there are
> torque wrenches out there(1/4" drive) that could measure
> that torque accurately.

What you're missing is that the problem is not getting the
right amount of torque. The problem is the assumption that X
ft-lbs. of torque correlates to exactly Y lbs. of tension in
the bolt.

> Also, I think the torque measurment will not be applicable
> if the fastener is deformed significantly and dirty(which
> I think you were including in what you were trying to
> say).

Correct. The surface variability adds a huge uncertainty to
achieving the recommended tension in a bolt via the
application of torque.

> P.S. When I started fixing my first Honda ('91 DX Sedan),
> I broke one of the studs for the valve cover like the OP.
> That's when I started to figure out that It'd be
> worthwhile for me to get a torque wrench. I think you can
> get wrenches for bicycles that are measured in in.*lbs.

My low range torque wrench is calibrated in inch-lbs.

For the OP: A fish weighing scale, with a hook on the end
easily attached to a wrench may be had at Wal-Mart for $3.
Mid-range is IIRC exactly 14 lbs.
notbob - 20 Apr 2006 05:32 GMT
> You apparently are unaware of how inaccurate the tension
> applied to a bolt via torquing it is even when using a
> calibrated torque wrench.

It's a helluva lot more accurate than a $3 made-in-China fish scale.

nb
SoCalMike - 22 Apr 2006 18:16 GMT
> "About" adds another 4% inaccuracy.  Get a torque wrench.

harbor freight sells em, cheap. even a beam-type would be ok.

speaking of, i oughta toss some old tools on ebay. make a few bucks!
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.