In article
<mcmurtri-3ACC17.09590320042006@sn-radius.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net>, Kevin
McMurtrie <mcmurtri@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> > Whats up peoples,
> >
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Yes, it damages up your car.
If a car has lots of power (eg Porsche 911 Turbo S cabriolet --cost $147,435)
you would not need to use the hand brake to burn rubber. While in high
school, I took a ride with a friend that had a 8 cyld. Ford that had a 4
barrel carb.
He was able to burn rubber without making use of the hand brake.
Jason

Signature
NEWSGROUP SUBSCRIBERS MOTTO
We respect those subscribers that ask for advice or provide advice.
We do NOT respect the subscribers that enjoy criticizing people.
TeGGeR® - 21 Apr 2006 02:54 GMT
> In article
> <mcmurtri-3ACC17.09590320042006@sn-radius.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net>,
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> If a car has lots of power (eg Porsche 911 Turbo S cabriolet --cost
> $147,435)
I'm supposed to be impressed because the car is overpriced. Bald, pot-
bellied white men with hairy chests and gold chains buy that kind of car.
> you would not need to use the hand brake to burn rubber.
And you know this...how? You've driven the vehicle in question?
You don't need to use the handbrake to burn rubber in ANY car. I used to be
able to burn rubber in my '75 Corolla with seventy-five horsepower. But
then I was 19 and stupid. Sneering disregard for the mechanical integrity
of your car is all that's necessary.
> While in high school,
You're not far out of high school, are you?
> I took a ride with a friend that had a 8 cyld.
> Ford that had a 4 barrel carb.
I learned to drive in a 1970 Ford with a 4bbl carb. Couldn't burn rubber in
that without doing a brake stand. But then it had bias-ply tires and an
automatic tranny. And I was 16 and stupid. Good thing my mother never found
out.

Signature
TeGGeR®
The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/