Car Forum / Honda Cars / June 2006
190k Any reason to switch to SYNTHETIC now???
|
|
Thread rating:  |
FunkyKev - 25 Jun 2006 10:34 GMT 1998 Accord V6. 190k. Always used Castrol 5-30 regular or high mileage. No leaks, no smoke, no nuthin'...ever. Any reason to switch to Full Synthetic at any point...especially now? Thanks.
kevin
Elmo P. Shagnasty - 25 Jun 2006 13:20 GMT > 1998 Accord V6. 190k. Always used Castrol 5-30 regular or high > mileage. No leaks, no smoke, no nuthin'...ever. Any reason to switch > to Full Synthetic at any point...especially now? Dino oil works great. You obviously know how to take care of your car; synthetic would be a waste of time and money.
jim beam - 25 Jun 2006 13:57 GMT > 1998 Accord V6. 190k. Always used Castrol 5-30 regular or high > mileage. No leaks, no smoke, no nuthin'...ever. Any reason to switch > to Full Synthetic at any point...especially now? Thanks. > > kevin 1. there's not many true synthetics out there, regardless of what it says on the bottle. mobil is the only main stream one. 2. i was running mobil 1 on my 89 civic earlier this year. i was interested to note that not only did the car perform better, but fuel economy picked up a little too. in the range of 3% - 5%. that may not sound like a lot, but if you do the math, you only need just under 3% for the much greater cost of the oil to pay back in fuel savings. i'm also pleased to report that there were no issues with oil leaks. i'm not running it right now because i've recently changed the head gasket and am still in "flush" mode, but i intend to return to it shortly. 3. castrol is great conventional oil. i've used it for decades with great results. i occasionally try other oils just for the sake of experiment, and with the exception of mobil 1, have always been disappointed.
'Curly Q. Links' - 25 Jun 2006 14:34 GMT > 1998 Accord V6. 190k. Always used Castrol 5-30 regular or high > mileage. No leaks, no smoke, no nuthin'...ever. Any reason to switch > to Full Synthetic at any point...especially now? Thanks. > > kevin ----------------------------------
If you happen to live near the Arctic Circle, that would be a GREAT REASON. I don't live too close, but close enough.
'Curly'
Elle - 25 Jun 2006 16:03 GMT One can google on the prudence of switching high mileage vehicles to synthetic. A lot comes up. It seems there are a tiny number of such vehicles that experience leaks after such a switch. Most seem to do fine or even better on the synthetic, though.
> 1998 Accord V6. 190k. Always used Castrol 5-30 regular > or high > mileage. No leaks, no smoke, no nuthin'...ever. Any > reason to switch > to Full Synthetic at any point...especially now? Thanks. Michael Doyle - 26 Jun 2006 18:42 GMT > One can google on the prudence of switching high mileage > vehicles to synthetic. A lot comes up. It seems there are a > tiny number of such vehicles that experience leaks after > such a switch. Most seem to do fine or even better on the > synthetic, though. Include me in the group with no troubles. 94 VX started on Mobil1 at 190,000. Now at 205,000 with no leaks or trouble.
Elle - 26 Jun 2006 21:53 GMT > Elle wrote: >> One can google on the prudence of switching high mileage [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > on Mobil1 at 190,000. Now at 205,000 with no leaks or > trouble. Always good to have another data point. :-)
Seth - 26 Jun 2006 22:15 GMT >> Elle wrote: >>> One can google on the prudence of switching high mileage vehicles to [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Always good to have another data point. :-) My data is as follows...
'01 EX-V6 Accord. Bought new in 6-01. Use the cheap dino oil they carry at CarQuest. Change oil at approx 7,000 miles. Vehicle now has 161,000 miles and still running strong!
Thinking I might trade it in when the new Civic GE comes to N.Y.
Greg Campbell - 27 Jun 2006 15:32 GMT >>Include me in the group with no troubles. 94 VX started >>on Mobil1 at 190,000. Now at 205,000 with no leaks or >>trouble.
> Always good to have another data point. :-) Poink!
92 Accord wagon. When purchased early this year, the car had 141K and a belly full of fresh dino oil. Changed at 144, switching to M1 syn. At nearly 150K, no leaks or other issues whatsoever. Burns/leaks < 1/2 qt per 5K miles. Oil is finally starting to darken and will be changed sometime in the next week or two. (Running syn ~6k seems a reasonable balance, IMO.)
-Greg
ACAR - 25 Jun 2006 18:00 GMT > 1998 Accord V6. 190k. Always used Castrol 5-30 regular or high > mileage. No leaks, no smoke, no nuthin'...ever. Any reason to switch > to Full Synthetic at any point...especially now? Thanks. > > kevin Only reason I can think of would be to reduce the number of oil changes you do every year. Synthetic *may* increase your mpg by a little bit, adding economic value.
I use Mobil 1 synthetic in all my cars because of the local temperature range and number of cars I look after. I use 5W-30 in all of them and can report the same results as you, no leaks, no smoke, no oil-related issues of any kind. Usually get better than EPA mpg ratings. Been using Mobil 1 since 1987.
YMMV
johnin - 25 Jun 2006 21:29 GMT 1998 Accord V6. 190k. Always used Castrol 5-30 regular or hig mileage. No leaks, no smoke, no nuthin'...ever. Any reason to switc to Full Synthetic at any point...especially now? Thanks
kevi Kevin if you made it this far with mineral dinosoure oil 190k why switch and stop there yes synthetic oil is better but thats a hole topic for a other day to discuss my point is think about whats worked for you up to now. and consider the cost of switching over the benifits your mileag
basically put your vehicle has 190.000km how much longer do you think it will go for? yes its a well engineered honda but even well engineered vehicles don last forever in every day use my opinion with that kind of mileage i would use the castrol high mileage or for the same price use castrol semi/synthetic
-- johnin
SoCalMike - 26 Jun 2006 05:16 GMT > 1998 Accord V6. 190k. Always used Castrol 5-30 regular or high > mileage. No leaks, no smoke, no nuthin'...ever. Any reason to switch > to Full Synthetic at any point...especially now? Thanks. > > kevin not really, no. maybe if you want to extend your change interval a bit, but other than that? nah.
jmattis@attglobal.net - 26 Jun 2006 05:38 GMT I switched the wife's 04 MDX to synth a few months ago. Computer did not show any increase in mileage whatsoever.
I use synth in my lawnmower. High stress, non-pressurized, gets real hot in summer (especially if the air fins get blocked by grass trimmings at times). $2 worth of oil in a $200 lawnmower once a year. That's extravagant, but probably more useful than synth in a car engine.
ACAR - 27 Jun 2006 01:04 GMT > I switched the wife's 04 MDX to synth a few months ago. Computer did > not show any increase in mileage whatsoever. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > That's extravagant, but probably more useful than synth in a car > engine Funny you should mention a lawn mower engine. Against the express instruction not to use synthetic oil in my lawn mower engine, I've been running synthetic in it for about 15 years now. Engine's the only part of the mower still operating good as new. I can't recall when I last changed the spark plug; starts with one pull. (Since I use syn. in my cars, I'm able to squeeze a bit more oil from every quart by draining "empty" bottles overnight. I recover almost a quart every year and get to fill my lawn mower engine for "free.")
Earle Horton - 26 Jun 2006 18:14 GMT > > 1998 Accord V6. 190k. Always used Castrol 5-30 regular or high > > mileage. No leaks, no smoke, no nuthin'...ever. Any reason to switch [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > not really, no. maybe if you want to extend your change interval a bit, > but other than that? nah. Most of the stuff I have read indicates that you don't really get to extend your change interval using synthetic. One reason to change oil is contamination: from fuel, combustion by-products, and water. Synthetic doesn't change how fast that happens. Another reason is gelling of the oil, which together with contamination creates sludge, which is Real Bad Stuff to have in your oil pan. Responsible oil change intervals and practices, such as draining the oil when hot or at least warm, prevent gel formation with dino oil.
You can't leave synthetic in there forever, so you have to come up with another reason to use it.
Earle
 Signature Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
ACAR - 28 Jun 2006 04:23 GMT > Most of the stuff I have read indicates that you don't really get to extend > your change interval using synthetic. bobistheoilguy's web site contains lots of oil analysis reports that say just the opposite.
One reason to change oil is
> contamination: from fuel, combustion by-products, and water. Synthetic > doesn't change how fast that happens. Synthetic oil handles these impurities differently than natural oil.
Another reason is gelling of the oil,
> which together with contamination creates sludge, which is Real Bad Stuff to > have in your oil pan. Synthetic oil does not break down and wear out like natural oil and it is nearly impossible to make it gell in an autombile AFAIK.
Responsible oil change intervals and practices, such
> as draining the oil when hot or at least warm, prevent gel formation with > dino oil. Changing dino oil prevents gellling, nothing to do with changing warm/cold although changing warm/hot oil is a better practice.
> You can't leave synthetic in there forever, so you have to come up with > another reason to use it. Synthetic oil is typically good for at least twice the duration compared with dino oil under the same operating conditions according to the oil analysis reports I've seen.
In very cold climates, synthetic oil is the only stuff that flows. In very hot climates, synthetic oil does not suffer heat related break-down and lubrication failure like dino oil. (All race engines run synthetic oil partly because of its stability in high temperatures.)
The current crop of natural oils is very good but they are not the equal of synthetic oil. However, as the OP demonstrates, dino oil can produce excellent results.
|
|
|