 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Car Forum / Honda Cars / September 2006accord wheel alignment readout
just got a wheel alignment done on my 99 accord (64K miles) at midas... looking at the readout i don't see a whole lot of adjustments made (for eg caster L/R, sai, curve toein etc).. some of the numbers seem worse than before (camber L/R front/rear). i guess only toe looks to be improved.. my questions to the folks in-the-know- 1. what do you make of the read outs.. 2. does it indicate the best possible adjustments.. 3. finally are the alignment results objective or subjective.. if i took the same car to a different shop would i get similar results.. 4. now that the car is aligned, if i were to take it to another shop would they come back saying nothing needs to be done? too many questions, hope someone can shed some light on this.. thanks! front measured database adjusted caster left 2.82 1.80/2.80/3.80 2.86 right 2.11 1.80/2.80/3.80 2.13 sai left 7.96 n/a 7.96 right 6.44 n/a 6.44 curve left 0.3 n/a 0.3 toein right 0.5 n/a 0.5 camber left -0.1 -1.00/0.00/1.00 -0.25 angle right 0.84 -1.00/0.00/1.00 0.92 partial left -0.09 n/a 0.01 toe right 0.01 n/a 0.00 total toe -0.08 -0.04/0.00/0.04 0.01 set-back -0.11 n/a -0.09 rear camber left -1.22 -1.50/0.50/1.50 -1.35 angle right 0.33 -1.50/0.50/1.50 0.39 partial left -0.06 n/a 0.01 toe right -0.23 n/a 0.00 totaltoe -0.29 -0.00/0.01/0.03 0.01 thrust angle 0.29 n/a 0.01 set-back -0.12 n/a -0.15 Where are you going with these questions, they got it almost perfect, some specs are not adjustable. > just got a wheel alignment done on my 99 accord (64K miles) at midas... > looking at the readout i don't see a whole lot of adjustments made [quoted text clipped - 34 lines] > thrust angle 0.29 n/a 0.01 > set-back -0.12 n/a -0.15 I am trying to understand what was done? I don't enough to say if they got it right or not.. Just comparing the before and after readings with the database, I can't see improvements except for the Toe.. Front: Caster: worse than before (not close to the mid-point before or after) SAI:no change (no reference) Curve toein: no change (no reference) Camber: worse than before (the right reading is even closer to the top of the range after than before) Toe: improved Setback: ?? Rear: Caster: worse than before (left reading closer to the top of the range after than before) Toe: improved Thrust angle & setback: ?? So in summary only the toe has been improved.. I had wear on the outside of one tire, and the inside of another.. Does this explain it? I am trying to understand what was improved and how? > Where are you going with these questions, they got it almost perfect, some > specs are not adjustable. > > front > > measured database adjusted [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > > thrust angle 0.29 n/a 0.01 > > set-back -0.12 n/a -0.15 The n/a's are just specs, not adjustable, only the toe was way out. the difference between the lt and rt camber, ft and rear is a little too high. could cause a pull. >I am trying to understand what was done? > I don't enough to say if they got it right or not.. [quoted text clipped - 44 lines] >> > thrust angle 0.29 n/a 0.01 >> > set-back -0.12 n/a -0.15 > Where are you going with these questions, they got it almost perfect, > some specs are not adjustable. The only adjustment on the '99 Accord is toe. If you want to adjust anything else, you need to install aftermarket suspension parts. Also, as the bushings begin to sag from age, camber tends to increase.  SignatureTeGGeR® >> Where are you going with these questions, they got it almost perfect, >> some specs are not adjustable. > >The only adjustment on the '99 Accord is toe. If you want to adjust >anything else, you need to install aftermarket suspension parts. Or replace bent parts or bend something. In terms of tire wear toe is everything. Caster and camber will not do much to tire wear at all unless wildly off. Caster balance will have an effect on pull. If wildly wrong on both sides caster will change handling characteristics. Camber hardly makes a rat's a.s with radial tires even if wildly wrong -- although this varies with tire profile etc. Wear on one side of the tire only that is blamed on camber usually proves to be toe wear. Most cases of pull blamed on alignment prove to be tire issues. The alignment shop I sublet to routinely reports that the car pulled when they finished their alignment and road-tested it. They then move the tires around to prove that the pull moves with the tires and is not alignment-induced. Don www.donsautomotive.com Don www.donsautomotive.com >Also, as the bushings begin to sag from age, camber tends to increase. Toe does cause excessive wear, and is usually accompanied by feathering of the tread in the affected area. But don't discount the effect of negative camber, especially on a strut/lower-BJ system. I've seen plenty of non- lowered Hondas only 0.5 degrees out of spec with bald inner tread and 6/32's of outer tread. J >>> Where are you going with these questions, they got it almost perfect, >>> some specs are not adjustable. [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > >>Also, as the bushings begin to sag from age, camber tends to increase. >>> Where are you going with these questions, they got it almost perfect, >>> some specs are not adjustable. [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > alignment and road-tested it. They then move the tires around to > prove that the pull moves with the tires and is not alignment-induced. it's true about tires affecting pull - i've had that experience recently. bought a cheap set of tires a while back and am now regretting it for exactly those reasons. otoh, it's also [unfortunately] true that many alignment shops are not very good at their job. one place i used to live near, i'd routinely have to go back 2 or 3 times to make sure rear alignment on a civic was done right. "it's because you've got a bent wheel" doesn't cut it on a rim that's straight to within 0.2mm. finally, when it becomes clear that the customer won't accept b.s., they'll have the old dog do the job and magically, it gets done right... > Don > www.donsautomotive.com [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > >> Also, as the bushings begin to sag from age, camber tends to increase. if the camber on the left wheel is -ve and on the right wheel is +ve (and close to the top of the range) then the left wheel is leaning on its outer edge as is the right wheel.. how can this not be a cause of the tire wearing off unevenly? in my case both the front and rear left and right tires has this.. as regards caster, it went 2.82->2.86 on the left and 2.11->2.13 on the right.. maybe it helps but its not a big adjustment considering the range 1.80/2.80/3.80... btw, the reason i went to the alignment shop is i got new tires installed. the tire shop looked at my old tires and saw wear on the outside of the front/rear left.. only the rear right looked ok.. i wish i had some snaps of those, but oh well... bottomline: i would like to go back to midas and ask them to look at the caster.. but looks like u r saying that only the toe is adjustable.. of the three parameters the 99 accord has only the toe adjustable. that sounds woefully inadequate.. > >> Where are you going with these questions, they got it almost perfect, > >> some specs are not adjustable. [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > Don <snip> > but looks like u r saying that only the toe is > adjustable.. of the three parameters the 99 accord has only the > toe adjustable. that sounds woefully inadequate.. really? what other cars have adjustable caster and camber from factory? and why would they need it? > <snip> >> but looks like u r saying that only the toe is [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > really? what other cars have adjustable caster and camber from factory? > and why would they need it? Is this a loaded question? ;) Some older Honda's did have a ft caster adjustment. Subaru's have ft camber (along with many other cars) Mazda Miata's and some Chryslers (as well as others) have rear camber with the toe. The Chryslers cam be a challenge, for you have to move a toe bolt and camber bolt and caress both numbers into specs. I enjoyed the challenge. SignatureStephen W. Hansen ASE Certified Master Automobile Technician ASE Automobile Advanced Engine Performance ASE Undercar Specialist http://autorepair.about.com/cs/troubleshooting/l/bl_obd_main.htm http://www.troublecodes.net/technical/ http://www.familycar.com/Alignment.htm >> <snip> >>> but looks like u r saying that only the toe is [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > you have to move a toe bolt and camber bolt and caress both numbers into > specs. I enjoyed the challenge. ok, but that's not in the same way that toe is adjustable. and maybe i should have said "what other MODERN cars... ". things like camber are designed to be set at the factory and not monkeyed with again. the logic is that any post-factory misalignment is an impact damage issue and if it's not bent suspension componentry, it's the frame which needs to be re-set to bring it back into spec. from an engineering perspective, and assuming access to modern frame alignment gear, that's a much more "correct" way of doing it, and one that manufacturers capable of building decent and consistently well-aligned frames are entitled to take advantage of. > ok, but that's not in the same way that toe is adjustable. and maybe i > should have said "what other MODERN cars... ". things like camber are [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > decent and consistently well-aligned frames are entitled to take advantage > of. Agreed! A alignment is a fine tune of the final components; seen many new cars come with alignment out from the factory. (Mazda's come to mind) Some cars you can get a few degrees out of a non adjustable point, And I'll try it if necessary. Most people barely want an alignment looked at; they sure don't want to take it to a frame/body shop. We had an Eagle come into the Firestone I worked at from a local dealership; at trade-in. This car had barely 60k on it but it was drove hard and put away wet. So much wrong with it. I told them (after getting the numbers on a alignment check) it needed to go to a body shop. They insisted we "just get it to drive straight." We put adjustable cams on both ft tires; moved one side in, the other out; still couldn't get it to drive correctly. They eventually gave it to the "old timer" who knew (somewhat) what to move to get it to drive decent. We should have never touched it and the dealer is now out of business. Steve its interesting that you reference the http://www.familycar.com/Alignment.htm URL in your signature.. this was one of the sites i read to understand about alignment.. and i expected camber to be the reason why the outside of one tire and inside of another were worn out.. now if the camber is not adjustable in many front wheel drive cars then what is one to do? in my case the camber on the front and rear is worse after the alignment.. so they changed the camber.. how i dont know.. but it has changed for the worse.. my concern is how to make it better.. coz it cud be my imagination but i am seeing a ring appear on the outside of my brand new tires already.. ps: i am new to this whole aligmnent thing.. i wouldnt know which other cars have this parameter adjustable and which dont.. why some have it and why some dont.. but if you have the wheel tilted inside or the outside hence favoring one edge or the other as opposed to being vertical to the ground, my layman mind would think that you would want that to be adjustable.. > > <snip> > >> but looks like u r saying that only the toe is [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > http://www.troublecodes.net/technical/ > http://www.familycar.com/Alignment.htm What kind of car do you have, and do you have the alignment printout? SignatureStephen W. Hansen ASE Certified Master Automobile Technician ASE Automobile Advanced Engine Performance ASE Undercar Specialist http://autorepair.about.com/cs/troubleshooting/l/bl_obd_main.htm http://www.troublecodes.net/technical/ http://www.familycar.com/Alignment.htm > its interesting that you reference the > http://www.familycar.com/Alignment.htm URL in your signature.. [quoted text clipped - 43 lines] >> http://www.troublecodes.net/technical/ >> http://www.familycar.com/Alignment.htm its a 99 honda accord LX 4-cyl. i have the printout.. will try to scan it tommorow... in the meanwhile the alignment readings are posted at the beginning of the thread. thanks. > What kind of car do you have, and do you have the alignment printout? > [quoted text clipped - 55 lines] > >> http://www.troublecodes.net/technical/ > >> http://www.familycar.com/Alignment.htm printout @ http://www.mediamax.com/qzmp8/Hosted/midaswhlalign.PDF thanks. > its a 99 honda accord LX 4-cyl. > i have the printout.. will try to scan it tommorow... [quoted text clipped - 61 lines] > > >> http://www.troublecodes.net/technical/ > > >> http://www.familycar.com/Alignment.htm Sorry, I didn't note you are the original poster! Anyway, What I see is a cross camber problem in both front and rear, as if the car took a slide sideways. Optimum camber for front is 0 degrees, with a + or - of one degree, the rear a -.5 with a plus or minus of 1 degree also. LF is: OK RF is: .84, within limits but extreme LR is: 1.22, within limits but extreme RR is: OK Now, unless something is worn, there is no real way they moved it, unless it was sloppy work. Sometimes the numbers do bounce around a bit, but I wouldn't hold the shop responsible, although I am surprised they didn't bring it to your attention that there is a adjustment problem. Now the best fix is to see what is bent or worn; A cheaper route is to put an adjustable camber kit on the RF and LR. You may think about putting it on all 4 corners Here are two examples of the parts needed; I'd check with a Napa http://www.spcperformance.com/PerfPartSect/PerfPart_67125_165.html (a front camber ball joint Adj) http://www.spcperformance.com/PerfPartSect/PerfPart_67090.html (a rear camber control arm Adj) I hope this helps Stephen W. Hansen ASE Certified Master Automobile Technician ASE Automobile Advanced Engine Performance ASE Undercar Specialist >> >> http://autorepair.about.com/cs/troubleshooting/l/bl_obd_main.htm >> >> http://www.troublecodes.net/technical/ >> >> http://www.familycar.com/Alignment.htm |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.