> On 12/25/06 7:42 AM, in article Xns98A4583BD8FA4tegger@207.14.116.130,
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> fuse. Look for a 7.5 amp fuse marked backup or backup radio and pull
> it for > 10 seconds.
That's true. And in some markets the fuse is Backup/Hazard.
But I discourage fuse-pulling because it erases the evidence without
recording it. The old MIL-flash code is only a rough approximation of the
actual error. It has neither the precision nor definition of the OBD-II
readout.

Signature
Tegger
The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/
E Meyer - 27 Dec 2006 18:06 GMT
On 12/26/06 4:53 PM, in article Xns98A5B59E01283tegger@207.14.116.130,
>> On 12/25/06 7:42 AM, in article Xns98A4583BD8FA4tegger@207.14.116.130,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> actual error. It has neither the precision nor definition of the OBD-II
> readout.
True, there are additional codes to be gotten with the scanner, but
diagnostic procedures once you have the code are pretty much the same. At
the worst, you sometimes have to check a couple additional things if you go
by the blinking light.
Though there are more codes, the codes themselves are still not the be-all &
end-all of diagnosis. You still have to actually find the problem either
way & you still need the FSM and sometimes an actual mechanic with
specialized tools to do it.
It's becoming moot (MIL light decoding) with the Honda's of the past 6 or 7
years, because the pins you have to short to get them out are pretty well
buried in the scanner interface anyway. Nissan seems to be doing more to
keep the blinkin' light technique alive. It seems pretty clear Honda has
moved on.